BSAC vs RF vs TFC Stock Comparison

Banco Santander Chile, Regions Financial and Truist Financial Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (KEY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BSAC Banco Santander Chile
$31.82 -7.4% 1M +12.3% 1Y
Market cap
$14.99B
P/E
0.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
4.65%
Regional Banks Financial Services
4 wins
RF Regions Financial Corp
$28.51 +3.2% 1M +17.6% 1Y
Market cap
$24.29B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
3.88%
Regional Banks Financial Services
3 wins
TFC Truist Financial Corp
$48.56 +1.9% 1M +8.8% 1Y
Market cap
$59.32B
P/E
12.2x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
4.28%
Regional Banks Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Banco Santander Chile leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Banco Santander Chile 4, Regions Financial 3, Truist Financial 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBSACRFTFCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.99B $24.29B $59.32B TFC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.0x 11.3x 12.2x BSAC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.2x 10.2x 11.3x RF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +4.4% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 28.2% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 14.6% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.0x 1.6x — BSAC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 4.65% 3.88% 4.28% BSAC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +12.3% +17.6% +8.8% RF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.9%/yr +3.7%/yr -5.3%/yr BSAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.9% 23.3% 23.4% RF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 39/100 61/100 TFC

Percentile Scorecard

BSACRFTFC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBSACRFTFC
Valuation 11 #319 of 360 24 #275 of 360 87 #49 of 360
Growth 21 #152 of 191 10 #173 of 191 8 #176 of 191
Profitability – 49 #87 of 168 –
Financial Health 8 #161 of 175 49 #90 of 175 –
Shareholder Returns 93 #25 of 341 64 #123 of 341 89 #39 of 341
Overall 33 39 61
  • BSAC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • RF ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • TFC ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBSACRFTFCSPY
1 month -7.4%+3.2%+1.9% -0.2%
3 months -6.2%-8.8%-8.4% +3.9%
6 months -3.8%+0.6%-5.1% +8.2%
Year to date +2.3%+5.2%-1.3% +12.9%
1 year +12.3%+17.6%+8.8% +12.3%
3 years +82.0%+103.5%+75.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year +22.1%+26.7%+20.7% +23.3%
5 years +75.4%+20.1%-24.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +11.9%+3.7%-5.3% +10.9%
10 years +44.2%+163.0%+23.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year +3.7%+10.2%+2.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBSACRFTFCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.9%23.3%23.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.5%25.6%26.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.090.660.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.430.750.38 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.5%-44.9%-61.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.1%-12.0%-13.0% -1.2%
52-week high $37.46$32.40$55.81 $779.14
52-week low $28.22$24.07$43.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBSACRFTFC
P/E now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 12.1x 11.3xmedian 12.1x 12.2xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 3.4x 3.2xmedian 3.4x 2.7xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 5.0x 6.5xmedian 5.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -486.3xmedian 10.9x 14.6xmedian 10.9x 9.8xmedian 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.2x 1.3xmedian 1.2x 1.0xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 1.34 5.19median 1.34 -34.11median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBSACRFTFC
Revenue – $7.62B –
Operating income $278.26B – –
Net income -$1.70T $2.23B $5.19B
Free cash flow – $1.67B –
EPS (diluted) $1,126.89 $2.51 $3.93
Cash & equivalents $2.20B – –
Total debt $47.85B $7.63B –
Shares (diluted) 471.12M 857.00M 1.24B
Enterprise value -$10.86T $24.36B $59.32B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBSACRFTFC
P/E 0.0x 11.3x 12.2x
P/FCF -486.3x 14.6x 9.8x
P/Operating cash flow – 13.7x –
P/S 2.8x 3.2x 2.7x
P/B 2.4x 1.3x 1.0x
P/Tangible book -0.2x 1.4x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 0.0x 6.5x –
EV/EBIT 0.2x 6.7x –
EV/Revenue – 4.2x –
EV/FCF – 19.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 18.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 5.19 -34.11

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBSACRFTFC
Revenue growth (1Y) – 4.4% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -0.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -85.8% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 44.6% – –
Net income growth (1Y) -229.4% 7.5% -0.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -114.2% -1.1% -3.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -18.5% 15.6% 4.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 48.4% 2.2% -0.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -33.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -6.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -30.0% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -6.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBSACRFTFC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 64.2% –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – 37.4% –
Net margin – 28.2% –
FCF margin – 21.9% –
Operating cash flow margin – 23.3% –
Return on equity – 11.8% 8.3%
Return on assets 2,022% 1.4% 0.9%
Return on invested capital – 14.6% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.8x –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBSACRFTFC
Debt / assets 63.2% 4.7% –
Debt / equity 7.7x 0.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.0x 1.6x –
Debt / FCF – 4.6x –
Liabilities / assets 91.8% 88.3% 88.9%
Equity / assets 8.2% 11.7% 11.1%
Interest coverage – 2.5x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio 0.1x – –
Cash ratio 0.1x – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBSACRFTFC
Dividend yield 4.7% 3.9% 4.3%
Net buyback yield – 4.7% –
Shareholder yield 4.7% 8.6% 4.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 41.1% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 55.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 1.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 8.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBSACRFTFC
Forward P/E 11.2xFY2026 10.2xFY2026 11.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.84FY2026 $2.80FY2026 $4.28FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +9.7%FY2026 +20.2%FY2026 +12.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +2.5% -4.3% +18.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.07BFY2026 $7.33BFY2026 $19.70BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -7.8%FY2026 -3.3%FY2026 -4.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.1% +16.2% +1.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBSACRFTFC
Held by institutions 4.7% 84.8% 76.7%
Institutions holding 157 1,104 1,687
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.7% +2.9% +0.8%
Institutions buying 82 558 798
Institutions selling 51 347 657
Buyers to sellers 1.61 1.61 1.21

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BSACRFTFC
BSAC 1.00 0.31 0.32
RF 0.31 1.00 0.87
TFC 0.32 0.87 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BSAC, RF and TFC?

Truist Financial (TFC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) $14.99B, Regions Financial (RF) $24.29B, Truist Financial (TFC) $59.32B.

Which stock is cheaper, BSAC, RF and TFC?

Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 0.0x, Regions Financial (RF) 11.3x, Truist Financial (TFC) 12.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Regions Financial (RF) is cheapest (Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 11.2x, Regions Financial (RF) 10.2x, Truist Financial (TFC) 11.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Regions Financial (RF) returned the most: Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +12.3%, Regions Financial (RF) +17.6%, Truist Financial (TFC) +8.8%. Over five years, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) compounded fastest (Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +11.9%/yr, Regions Financial (RF) +3.7%/yr, Truist Financial (TFC) -5.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) has the highest dividend yield: Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 4.65%, Regions Financial (RF) 3.88%, Truist Financial (TFC) 4.28%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Regions Financial (RF) has been the steadiest (Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 28.9%, Regions Financial (RF) 23.3%, Truist Financial (TFC) 23.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BSAC, RF and TFC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.