BSAC vs ERIE vs NP Stock Comparison

Banco Santander Chile, Erie Indemnity and Neptune Insurance Holdings Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (KEY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BSAC Banco Santander Chile
$32.31 +0.6% 1M +12.3% 1Y
Market cap
$15.23B
P/E
0.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Regional Banks Financial Services
6 wins
ERIE Erie Indemnity Co
$285.63 +28.0% 1M -0.9% 1Y
Market cap
$12.72B
P/E
22.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.12B
Div. yield
0.02%
Insurance Brokers Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Banco Santander Chile leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Banco Santander Chile 6, Neptune Insurance Holdings 2, Erie Indemnity 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBSACERIENPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.23B $12.72B $3.83B BSAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.0x 22.1x 85.7x BSAC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.4x 23.6x 48.1x BSAC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +2.0% +33.8% NP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 14.0% 22.7% NP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 512.4% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.0x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +12.3% -0.9% +9.0% BSAC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.6%/yr +5.0%/yr — BSAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.5% 38.4% 60.5% BSAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 47/100 39/100 ERIE

Percentile Scorecard

BSACERIENP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBSACERIENP
Valuation 11 #319 of 360 14 #103 of 119 4 #114 of 119
Growth 19 #280 of 344 30 #82 of 117 82 #22 of 117
Profitability – 79 #25 of 117 99 #2 of 117
Financial Health 10 #306 of 339 84 #20 of 118 7 #110 of 118
Shareholder Returns 93 #26 of 352 30 #76 of 108 4 #104 of 108
Overall 33 47 39
  • BSAC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • ERIE ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • NP ranked among 126 companies in Insurance

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBSACERIENPSPY
1 month +0.6%+28.0%+2.7% -5.9%
3 months -9.6%+12.4%-14.9% -4.6%
6 months +5.8%+31.8%-8.4% +0.2%
Year to date +3.9%-0.4%-4.3% +7.5%
1 year +12.3%-0.9%+9.0% +8.2%
3 years +75.5%+1.9%— +68.3%
3 years, per year +20.6%+0.6%— +19.0%
5 years +72.9%+27.3%— +56.5%
5 years, per year +11.6%+5.0%— +9.4%
10 years +43.6%+182.5%— +251.5%
10 years, per year +3.7%+10.9%— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureBSACERIENPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.5%38.4%60.5% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.8%39.2%55.8% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.06-0.480.17 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.42-0.020.15 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.5%-62.0%-43.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.7%-4.7%-20.4% -5.9%
52-week high $37.46$299.78$35.05 $779.14
52-week low $28.76$207.24$17.14 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBSACERIENP
P/E now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 12.3x 22.9xmedian 10.9x 85.7xmedian 10.9x
P/S now vs peer median 76.7xmedian 3.4x 3.2xmedian 1.4x 19.4xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 5.0x —median 7.1x —median 7.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -13,168xmedian 10.6x 23.8xmedian 8.3x 46.7xmedian 8.3x
P/B now vs peer median 65.0xmedian 1.2x 5.2xmedian 1.5x -18.1xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 1.29 1.78median 0.62 —median 0.62

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBSACERIENP
Revenue – $4.12B $197.00M
Operating income $278.26B $736.01M $81.30M
Net income -$1.70T $576.14M $44.74M
Free cash flow – $554.04M $82.04M
EPS (diluted) $1,126.89 $226,647.13 $0.31
Cash & equivalents $2.20B $362.69M $17.43M
Total debt $47.85B – $215.00M
Shares (diluted) 471.12M 2.54K 146.39M
Enterprise value -$7.62T $11.24B $3.78B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBSACERIENP
P/E 0.0x 22.9x 85.7x
P/FCF -13,168x 23.8x 46.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 19.1x 46.7x
P/S 76.7x 3.2x 19.4x
P/B 65.0x 5.2x -18.1x
P/Tangible book -4.8x 5.2x -18.1x
EV/EBITDA 0.2x – –
EV/EBIT 1.6x 17.3x 49.6x
EV/Revenue – 3.1x 20.5x
EV/FCF – 23.0x 49.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – 18.5x 49.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 1.78 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBSACERIENP
Revenue growth (1Y) – 2.0% 33.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 9.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -85.8% 1.3% 7.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 44.6% 15.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) -229.4% -11.1% 0.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -114.2% 12.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) -18.5% -11.1% 197.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 48.4% 12.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -2.4% 53.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 24.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -4.0% 53.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 26.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBSACERIENP
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – 17.9% 41.3%
Pretax margin – 17.8% 34.1%
Net margin – 14.0% 22.7%
FCF margin – 13.4% 41.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 16.8% 41.6%
Return on equity – 23.0% –
Return on assets 2,022% 16.0% 43.4%
Return on invested capital – – 512.4%
Return on capital employed – 28.3% 3,191%
Asset turnover – 1.1x 1.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.2x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue – – 16.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBSACERIENP
Debt / assets 63.2% – 206.9%
Debt / equity 7.7x – -1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.0x – –
Debt / FCF – – 2.6x
Liabilities / assets 91.8% 30.3% 303.6%
Equity / assets 8.2% 69.7% -203.6%
Interest coverage – – 5.4x
Current ratio – 1.3x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.1x 1.2x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.4x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 10.46 5.27

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBSACERIENP
Dividend yield 4.6% 2.0% –
Net buyback yield – – 0.0%
Shareholder yield 4.6% 2.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 46.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 48.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 7.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 7.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBSACERIENP
Forward P/E 11.4xFY2026 23.6xFY2026 48.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.84FY2026 $12.09FY2026 $0.58FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +9.7%FY2026 +13.1%FY2026 +41.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +2.5% +15.6% +25.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.07BFY2026 $4.05BFY2026 $195.40MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -7.8%FY2026 -0.6%FY2026 +22.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.1% -1.2% +18.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBSACERIENP
Held by institutions 0.2% 45.2% 71.7%
Institutions holding 157 438 136
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.7% +4.5% +3.3%
Institutions buying 82 272 105
Institutions selling 51 112 24
Buyers to sellers 1.61 2.43 4.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BSACERIENP
BSAC 1.00 -0.08 0.04
ERIE -0.08 1.00 0.26
NP 0.04 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BSAC, ERIE and NP?

Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) $15.23B, Erie Indemnity (ERIE) $12.72B, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) $3.83B.

Which stock is cheaper, BSAC, ERIE and NP?

Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 0.0x, Erie Indemnity (ERIE) 22.1x, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 85.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) is cheapest (Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 11.4x, Erie Indemnity (ERIE) 23.6x, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 48.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Erie Indemnity (ERIE) +2.0%, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) +33.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) has the highest net margin (Erie Indemnity (ERIE) 14.0%, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 22.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) returned the most: Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +12.3%, Erie Indemnity (ERIE) -0.9%, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) +9.0%. Over five years, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) compounded fastest (Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +11.6%/yr, Erie Indemnity (ERIE) +5.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 0.00%, Erie Indemnity (ERIE) 0.02%, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 0.00%. Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) and Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) has been the steadiest (Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 29.5%, Erie Indemnity (ERIE) 38.4%, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 60.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BSAC, ERIE and NP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.