BR vs GLOO vs ITMSF Stock Comparison

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Gloo Holdings and Intermap Technologies Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SSNC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GLOO Gloo Holdings, Inc.
$2.98 -33.3% 1M
Market cap
$242.59M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$154.29M
Div. yield
–
Business Process Automation Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Broadridge Financial Solutions leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Broadridge Financial Solutions 8, Gloo Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBRGLOOITMSFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $20.31B $242.59M $39.84M BR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.4x -1.9x -3.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.3x — 27.5x BR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.5% +275.5% -66.2% GLOO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.0% -81.3% -147.8% BR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 16.7% -54.6% — BR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 0.0x 1.8x GLOO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.25% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -19.0% — -72.6% BR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years 0.0%/yr — -2.7%/yr BR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.3% 88.8% 84.4% BR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 35/100 26/100 BR

Percentile Scorecard

BRGLOOITMSF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBRGLOOITMSF
Valuation 66 #35 of 101 20 #81 of 101 19 #101 of 124
Growth 39 #60 of 97 83 #17 of 97 1 #112 of 113
Profitability 83 #17 of 93 12 #82 of 93 20 #87 of 109
Financial Health 45 #60 of 108 58 #46 of 108 64 #47 of 127
Shareholder Returns 47 #34 of 63 3 #61 of 63 –
Overall 56 35 26
  • BR ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • GLOO ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • ITMSF ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBRGLOOITMSFSPY
1 month +10.7%-33.3%-16.7% +0.7%
3 months +15.1%-5.4%-22.5% +3.7%
6 months +15.7%-53.1%-60.7% +7.1%
Year to date -20.2%-47.6%-59.6% +12.8%
1 year -19.0%—-72.6% +11.9%
3 years +5.1%—+37.5% +85.2%
3 years, per year +1.7%—+11.2% +22.8%
5 years -0.2%—-12.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year 0.0%—-2.7% +10.9%
10 years +178.0%—-21.4% +262.0%
10 years, per year +10.8%—-2.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBRGLOOITMSFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.3%88.8%84.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.3%83.7%99.3% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.030.870.86 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.63—-0.86 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.3%-69.4%-78.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -23.2%-68.6%-72.6% -1.2%
52-week high $232.02$9.50$2.01 $779.14
52-week low $135.44$2.91$0.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBRGLOOITMSF
P/E now vs peer median 18.4xmedian 28.0x -1.9xmedian 28.0x -3.5xmedian 39.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 2.8x 1.6xmedian 2.8x 6.0xmedian 4.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.4xmedian 16.9x -2.8xmedian 16.9x -2.8xmedian 32.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.9xmedian 15.9x -3.7xmedian 15.9x -4.6xmedian 27.4x
P/B now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 3.2x 1.6xmedian 3.2x 2.3xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.84median 0.89 —median 0.89 —median 1.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBRGLOOITMSF
Revenue $7.48B $154.29M $6.65M
Gross profit $2.38B $45.81M –
Operating income $1.30B -$100.96M -$9.75M
Net income $1.12B -$125.92M -$9.82M
Free cash flow $1.28B -$66.32M -$8.57M
R&D – $24.02M –
EPS (diluted) $9.60 $-1.54 $-0.16
Cash & equivalents $402.90M $39.30M $16.18M
Total debt $3.25B $37.42M $1.65M
Shares (diluted) 117.10M 81.41M 61.80M
Enterprise value $18.94B $116.51M -$43.93M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBRGLOOITMSF
P/E 18.4x -1.9x -3.5x
P/FCF 15.9x -3.7x -4.6x
P/Operating cash flow 15.1x -3.8x -5.6x
P/S 2.7x 1.6x 6.0x
P/B 7.1x 1.6x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 12.4x 2.1x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA 14.4x -2.8x -2.8x
EV/EBIT 17.8x -2.4x -2.5x
EV/Revenue 3.1x 1.6x 3.6x
EV/FCF 18.1x -3.6x -2.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.2x -3.7x -3.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.84 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBRGLOOITMSF
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.5% 275.5% -66.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.2% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.2% 368.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.0% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.4% 1.8% -1,317%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 11.6% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 33.9% 2.7% -1,584%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 21.3% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 35.3% 91.1% -1,313%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 21.9% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.9% – -365.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.8% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.4% – -216.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.7% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBRGLOOITMSF
Gross margin 31.8% 29.7% –
EBITDA margin 21.5% -55.4% -128.3%
Operating margin 17.4% -65.4% -146.6%
Pretax margin 19.3% -83.9% -152.3%
Net margin 15.0% -81.3% -147.8%
FCF margin 17.1% -43.0% -129.0%
Operating cash flow margin 18.0% -41.7% -107.7%
Return on equity 39.7% -84.9% -51.9%
Return on assets 12.7% -49.4% -36.5%
Return on invested capital 16.7% -54.6% –
Return on capital employed 17.5% -50.5% -45.5%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.6x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 0.5x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 12.3% 9.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBRGLOOITMSF
Debt / assets 36.4% 13.8% 1.6%
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.2x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 0.0x 1.8x
Debt / FCF 2.5x -0.6x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 68.2% 42.5% 32.0%
Equity / assets 31.8% 57.5% 68.0%
Interest coverage – -9.9x -180.5x
Current ratio 1.2x 1.2x 3.3x
Quick ratio 1.1x 1.1x 3.2x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.7x 2.9x
Altman Z-score 4.07 0.25 -11.00

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBRGLOOITMSF
Dividend yield 2.2% – –
Net buyback yield 2.9% -36.9% –
Shareholder yield 5.1% -36.9% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBRGLOOITMSF
Forward P/E 17.3xFY2027 – 27.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.32FY2027 $-0.60FY2026 $0.02FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +7.5%FY2027 – –
EPS growth, the year after +5.0% – +350.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.42BFY2027 $188.99MFY2026 $32.39MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.9%FY2027 +99.7%FY2026 +205.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.8% +56.5% +29.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBRGLOOITMSF
Held by institutions 92.3% – –
Institutions holding 1,015 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.2% – –
Institutions buying 487 – –
Institutions selling 399 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.22 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BRGLOOITMSF
BR 1.00 0.01 0.06
GLOO 0.01 1.00 0.06
ITMSF 0.06 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BR, GLOO and ITMSF?

Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) $20.31B, Gloo Holdings (GLOO) $242.59M, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) $39.84M.

Which company is growing faster?

Gloo Holdings (GLOO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) +8.5%, Gloo Holdings (GLOO) +275.5%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -66.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) has the highest net margin (Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) 15.0%, Gloo Holdings (GLOO) -81.3%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -147.8%). On return on invested capital, Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) leads (Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) 16.7%, Gloo Holdings (GLOO) -54.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) returned the most: Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) -19.0%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -72.6%. Over five years, Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) compounded fastest (Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) 0.0%/yr, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -2.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) 2.25%. Gloo Holdings (GLOO) and Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) has been the steadiest (Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) 30.3%, Gloo Holdings (GLOO) 88.8%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) 84.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BR, GLOO and ITMSF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.