BOC vs CCO vs LAMR Stock Comparison

Boston Omaha, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings and Lamar Advertising Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BOC BOSTON OMAHA Corp
$12.58 -5.8% 1M -8.4% 1Y
Market cap
$383.94M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$102.32M
Div. yield
–
Billboard REITs Real Estate
LAMR Lamar Advertising Co/New
$155.02 +7.5% 1M +29.1% 1Y
Market cap
$15.94B
P/E
28.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.33B
Div. yield
0.04%
Billboard REITs Real Estate
6 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Lamar Advertising leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Lamar Advertising 6, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBOCCCOLAMRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $383.94M $1.23B $15.94B LAMR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -28.7x -11.6x 28.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 24.6x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -2.6% +9.1% +4.4% CCO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -13.1% -6.3% 23.9% LAMR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -0.6% 17.7% 16.1% CCO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 10.0x 3.2x LAMR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -8.4% +77.9% +29.1% CCO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -18.6%/yr -2.1%/yr +6.0%/yr LAMR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.5% 35.7% 20.8% LAMR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 35/100 42/100 55/100 LAMR

Percentile Scorecard

BOCCCOLAMR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBOCCCOLAMR
Valuation 40 #7 of 11 80 #3 of 11 70 #4 of 11
Growth 11 #9 of 10 56 #5 of 10 44 #6 of 10
Profitability 0 #10 of 10 22 #8 of 10 44 #6 of 10
Financial Health 90 #2 of 11 10 #10 of 11 60 #5 of 11
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 35 42 55
  • BOC ranked among 11 companies in Infrastructure REITs
  • CCO ranked among 11 companies in Infrastructure REITs
  • LAMR ranked among 11 companies in Infrastructure REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBOCCCOLAMRSPY
1 month -5.8%+1.7%+7.5% -1.0%
3 months -11.8%+0.4%-2.8% +2.9%
6 months +2.1%+1.3%+15.4% +6.4%
Year to date +1.7%+9.5%+22.5% +11.4%
1 year -8.4%+77.9%+29.1% +13.1%
3 years -13.8%+120.0%+86.7% +79.4%
3 years, per year -4.8%+30.1%+23.2% +21.5%
5 years -64.3%-10.0%+33.8% +67.7%
5 years, per year -18.6%-2.1%+6.0% +10.9%
10 years —-57.9%+138.7% +255.2%
10 years, per year —-8.3%+9.1% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureBOCCCOLAMRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.5%35.7%20.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.7%30.1%20.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.140.560.31 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.262.181.40 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -69.5%-78.8%-35.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -16.6%-0.8%-5.7% -2.5%
52-week high $15.09$2.44$164.33 $779.14
52-week low $11.06$1.36$116.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBOCCCOLAMR
P/E now vs peer median -28.6xmedian 24.1x -11.6xmedian 24.1x 28.3xmedian 24.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 6.3x 0.7xmedian 6.3x 5.8xmedian 6.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 16.7x 12.5xmedian 16.7x 15.7xmedian 16.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 18.0x 14.6xmedian 18.0x 18.8xmedian 18.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.3x -0.4xmedian 2.3x 13.6xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.36median 0.71 0.12median 0.71 2.81median 0.71

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBOCCCOLAMR
Revenue $102.32M $1.68B $2.33B
Gross profit $69.69M $908.81M $1.57B
Operating income -$3.43M $316.73M $739.17M
Net income -$18.04M -$104.29M $565.31M
Free cash flow – $84.25M $718.05M
EPS (diluted) $-0.44 $-0.21 $5.47
Cash & equivalents $15.10M $192.14M $67.95M
Total debt $47.58M $5.11B $13.78B
Shares (diluted) 30.42M 508.99M 101.59M
Enterprise value $179.45M $518.82M $15.74B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBOCCCOLAMR
P/E -28.6x -11.6x 28.3x
P/FCF – 14.6x 18.8x
P/Operating cash flow – 7.7x 14.9x
P/S 3.7x 0.7x 5.8x
P/B 0.7x -0.4x 13.6x
P/Tangible book 0.8x -0.3x -108.8x
EV/EBITDA – 12.5x 15.7x
EV/EBIT -116.4x 19.4x 22.9x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 3.7x 7.3x
EV/FCF – 73.0x 23.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 38.3x 18.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.36 0.12 2.81

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBOCCCOLAMR
Revenue growth (1Y) -2.6% 9.1% 4.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.0% -0.9% 3.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -3.8% 10.0% 5.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.4% -0.2% 4.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -3.1% 9.5% 20.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 20.0% 9.7% 8.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,201% -544.8% 28.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -110.3% -100.0% 10.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -1,914% -580.3% 26.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -79.3% -96.3% 10.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 86.4% 4.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 34.2% 5.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 280.8% -0.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 40.1% 6.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBOCCCOLAMR
Gross margin 68.1% 54.1% 67.4%
EBITDA margin – 29.4% 46.5%
Operating margin -3.3% 18.9% 31.8%
Pretax margin -18.2% -7.4% 24.8%
Net margin -13.1% -6.3% 23.9%
FCF margin – 5.0% 30.9%
Operating cash flow margin – 9.6% 39.0%
Return on equity -3.4% – 57.2%
Return on assets -2.6% -2.7% 8.1%
Return on invested capital -0.6% 17.7% 16.1%
Return on capital employed -0.5% 10.1% 12.0%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.4x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -1.5x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.6% 1.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBOCCCOLAMR
Debt / assets 7.0% 135.7% 50.3%
Debt / equity 0.1x -1.5x 3.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – 10.0x 3.2x
Debt / FCF – 60.6x 4.9x
Liabilities / assets 24.6% 191.9% 85.8%
Equity / assets 75.4% -91.9% 14.2%
Interest coverage -1.4x 0.8x 4.5x
Current ratio 2.0x 1.3x 0.6x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.9x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.3x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 1.57 -1.73 1.75

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBOCCCOLAMR
Dividend yield – – 4.3%
Net buyback yield – – -0.1%
Shareholder yield – 0.0% 4.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 117.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 92.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 5.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 7.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBOCCCOLAMR
Forward P/E – – 24.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.08FY2026 $-0.06FY2026 $6.30FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -250.0%FY2026 +9.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +3.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $116.04MFY2026 $1.78BFY2026 $2.48BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1.5%FY2026 +11.5%FY2026 +9.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.2% -5.2% +2.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBOCCCOLAMR
Held by institutions 64.3% 80.6% 98.1%
Institutions holding 137 196 775
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.0% +6.6% 0.0%
Institutions buying 81 101 426
Institutions selling 24 46 232
Buyers to sellers 3.38 2.20 1.84

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BOCCCOLAMR
BOC 1.00 0.04 0.11
CCO 0.04 1.00 0.14
LAMR 0.11 0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry
BOC · Billboard REITs

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BOC, CCO and LAMR?

Lamar Advertising (LAMR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Boston Omaha (BOC) $383.94M, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) $1.23B, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) $15.94B.

Which company is growing faster?

Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Boston Omaha (BOC) -2.6%, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) +9.1%, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) +4.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lamar Advertising (LAMR) has the highest net margin (Boston Omaha (BOC) -13.1%, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) -6.3%, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) 23.9%). On return on invested capital, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) leads (Boston Omaha (BOC) -0.6%, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) 17.7%, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) 16.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) returned the most: Boston Omaha (BOC) -8.4%, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) +77.9%, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) +29.1%. Over five years, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) compounded fastest (Boston Omaha (BOC) -18.6%/yr, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) -2.1%/yr, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) +6.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Boston Omaha (BOC) 0.00%, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) 0.00%, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) 0.04%. Boston Omaha (BOC) and Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) has been the steadiest (Boston Omaha (BOC) 32.5%, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO) 35.7%, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) 20.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BOC, CCO and LAMR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.