BMHL vs BWMN Stock Comparison

Bluemount Holdings and Bowman Consulting Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Bowman Consulting leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Bowman Consulting 3, Bluemount Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBMHLBWMNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $76.50M $705.00M BWMN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 31.9x 102.4x BMHL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 20.7x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +14.2% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 1.3% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 3.8% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 4.4x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -5.3% -2.7% BWMN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +23.5%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 71.0% 63.2% BWMN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 43/100 –

Percentile Scorecard

BMHLBWMN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBMHLBWMN
Valuation 7 #104 of 112 27 #82 of 112
Growth – 81 #19 of 96
Profitability – 39 #56 of 91
Financial Health 47 #67 of 125 23 #97 of 125
Shareholder Returns – 44 #38 of 67
Overall – 43
  • BMHL ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • BWMN ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBMHLBWMNSPY
1 month -43.0%+0.6% -0.8%
3 months -45.7%+63.3% +3.5%
6 months -13.8%+37.8% +7.0%
Year to date -8.1%+29.7% +12.2%
1 year -5.3%-2.7% +13.0%
3 years —+62.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+17.6% +23.1%
5 years —+186.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+23.5% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureBMHLBWMNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 71.0%63.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 80.4%53.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.271.51 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.07-0.04 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.3%-56.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -50.3%-3.6% -1.8%
52-week high $6.16$44.43 $779.14
52-week low $3.06$25.31 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBMHLBWMN
P/E now vs peer median 31.9xmedian 21.9x 102.3xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 9,615xmedian 0.9x 1.4xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.2x 19.3xmedian 12.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -15,921xmedian 14.3x 58.8xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 6,936xmedian 2.3x 2.9xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.02 5.88median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBMHLBWMN
Revenue – $527.60M
Gross profit – $281.51M
Operating income – $17.72M
Net income – $7.38M
Free cash flow – $12.56M
EPS (diluted) – $0.41
Cash & equivalents $939.29 $10.49M
Total debt – $759.87M
Shares (diluted) 25.09M 16.60M
Enterprise value $65.99M $655.18M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBMHLBWMN
P/E 31.9x 102.3x
P/FCF -15,921x 58.8x
P/Operating cash flow – 31.8x
P/S 9,615x 1.4x
P/B 6,936x 2.9x
P/Tangible book 6,936x 4.3x
EV/EBITDA – 19.3x
EV/EBIT – 53.8x
EV/Revenue – 1.8x
EV/FCF – 75.9x
EV/Operating cash flow – 41.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 5.88

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBMHLBWMN
Revenue growth (1Y) – 14.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 19.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 15.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 21.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 47.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 76.6%
Net income growth (1Y) – -32.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 25.1%
EPS growth (1Y) – -33.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 17.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -33.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 49.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -62.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 29.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBMHLBWMN
Gross margin – 53.4%
EBITDA margin – 9.3%
Operating margin – 3.4%
Pretax margin – 0.7%
Net margin – 1.3%
FCF margin – 2.4%
Operating cash flow margin – 4.4%
Return on equity – 2.9%
Return on assets – 1.2%
Return on invested capital – 3.8%
Return on capital employed – 5.2%
Asset turnover – 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 3.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 3.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBMHLBWMN
Debt / assets 7,223% 36.4%
Debt / equity 82.8x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – 4.4x
Debt / FCF – 18.0x
Liabilities / assets 12.7% 58.6%
Equity / assets 87.3% 41.4%
Interest coverage – –
Current ratio – 0.9x
Quick ratio – 0.8x
Cash ratio – 0.0x
Altman Z-score – 2.09

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBMHLBWMN
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield – 3.2%
Shareholder yield – 3.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBMHLBWMN
Forward P/E – 20.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $2.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +23.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +16.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $555.17MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +27.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +10.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBMHLBWMN
Held by institutions – 63.8%
Institutions holding – 136
Change in shares held, QoQ – +3.1%
Institutions buying – 78
Institutions selling – 36
Buyers to sellers – 2.17

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BMHLBWMN
BMHL 1.00 0.06
BWMN 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BMHL and BWMN?

Bowman Consulting (BWMN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) $76.50M, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) $705.00M.

Which stock is cheaper, BMHL and BWMN?

Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) 31.9x, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 102.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bowman Consulting (BWMN) returned the most: Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) -5.3%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) -2.7%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) has been the steadiest (Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) 71.0%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 63.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do BMHL and BWMN move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.06, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, BMHL and BWMN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.