BMHL vs ACN Stock Comparison

Bluemount Holdings and Accenture Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ACN Accenture plc
$249.43 +35.8% 1M -0.2% 1Y
Market cap
$151.42B
P/E
19.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$73.10B
Div. yield
0.03%
Consulting Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Accenture leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Accenture 3, Bluemount Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBMHLACNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $45.73M $151.42B ACN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.0x 19.4x ACN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 16.2x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +6.7% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 10.7% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 20.9% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.4x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +4.5% -0.2% BMHL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -6.8%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 70.0% 50.0% ACN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 64/100 –

Percentile Scorecard

BMHLACN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBMHLACN
Valuation 7 #104 of 112 51 #55 of 112
Growth – 48 #50 of 96
Profitability – 88 #12 of 93
Financial Health 47 #67 of 126 80 #26 of 126
Shareholder Returns – 53 #32 of 67
Overall – 64
  • BMHL ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • ACN ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBMHLACNSPY
1 month -37.6%+35.8% -1.0%
3 months -38.7%+69.7% +2.9%
6 months -3.6%+39.8% +6.4%
Year to date +3.6%-7.0% +11.4%
1 year +4.5%-0.2% +13.1%
3 years —-15.8% +79.4%
3 years, per year —-5.6% +21.5%
5 years —-29.5% +67.7%
5 years, per year —-6.8% +10.9%
10 years —+115.8% +255.2%
10 years, per year —+8.0% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureBMHLACNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 70.0%50.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 78.1%51.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.340.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.060.00 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -48.1%-70.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.0%-13.6% -2.5%
52-week high $6.16$288.54 $779.14
52-week low $3.07$124.44 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBMHLACN
P/E now vs peer median 36.0xmedian 21.0x 19.6xmedian 21.0x
P/S now vs peer median 10,841xmedian 0.9x 2.3xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.3x 12.3xmedian 12.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -17,950xmedian 15.1x 13.2xmedian 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median 7,820xmedian 2.4x 5.0xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.02 4.78median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBMHLACN
Revenue – $73.10B
Gross profit – $23.40B
Operating income – $10.59B
Net income – $7.79B
Free cash flow – $12.58B
EPS (diluted) – $12.65
Cash & equivalents $939.29 $10.17B
Total debt – $5.14B
Shares (diluted) 25.09M 615.59M
Enterprise value $35.21M $110.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBMHLACN
P/E 36.0x 19.6x
P/FCF -17,950x 13.2x
P/Operating cash flow – 12.6x
P/S 10,841x 2.3x
P/B 7,820x 5.0x
P/Tangible book 7,820x 5.5x
EV/EBITDA – 12.3x
EV/EBIT – 15.2x
EV/Revenue – 2.2x
EV/FCF – 12.8x
EV/Operating cash flow – 12.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 4.78

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBMHLACN
Revenue growth (1Y) – 6.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 4.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 6.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 4.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 0.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 4.9%
Net income growth (1Y) – -2.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 2.8%
EPS growth (1Y) – 0.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 4.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 20.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 10.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 22.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 10.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBMHLACN
Gross margin – 32.0%
EBITDA margin – 17.9%
Operating margin – 14.5%
Pretax margin – 14.6%
Net margin – 10.7%
FCF margin – 17.2%
Operating cash flow margin – 18.0%
Return on equity – 24.3%
Return on assets – 11.7%
Return on invested capital – 20.9%
Return on capital employed – 22.9%
Asset turnover – 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBMHLACN
Debt / assets 7,223% 7.5%
Debt / equity 82.8x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.4x
Debt / FCF – 0.4x
Liabilities / assets 12.7% 52.0%
Equity / assets 87.3% 48.0%
Interest coverage – 39.8x
Current ratio – 1.3x
Quick ratio – 1.3x
Cash ratio – 0.5x
Altman Z-score – 4.98

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBMHLACN
Dividend yield – 2.6%
Net buyback yield – 2.6%
Shareholder yield – 5.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 50.5%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 31.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 9.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 12.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBMHLACN
Forward P/E – 16.2xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year – $15.40FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – +10.2%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after – -2.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $72.33BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY – -2.5%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after – +18.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBMHLACN
Held by institutions – 73.0%
Institutions holding – 1,898
Change in shares held, QoQ – -1.6%
Institutions buying – 957
Institutions selling – 776
Buyers to sellers – 1.23

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BMHLACN
BMHL 1.00 0.02
ACN 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BMHL and ACN?

Accenture (ACN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) $45.73M, Accenture (ACN) $151.42B.

Which stock is cheaper, BMHL and ACN?

Accenture (ACN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) 36.0x, Accenture (ACN) 19.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) returned the most: Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) +4.5%, Accenture (ACN) -0.2%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) 0.00%, Accenture (ACN) 0.03%. Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Accenture (ACN) has been the steadiest (Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) 70.0%, Accenture (ACN) 50.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do BMHL and ACN move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.02, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, BMHL and ACN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Accenture (ACN) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.