BLNE vs CWGL Stock Comparison

Beeline Holdings and Crimson Wine Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BLNE Beeline Holdings, Inc.
$0.67 -24.7% 1M -79.9% 1Y
Market cap
$22.08M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$10.02M
Div. yield
–
Spirits and Wine Consumer Staples
2 wins
CWGL Crimson Wine Group, Ltd
$4.15 -6.1% 1M -21.0% 1Y
Market cap
$83.79M
P/E
119.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$72.36M
Div. yield
–
Spirits and Wine Consumer Staples
5 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Crimson Wine leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Crimson Wine 5, Beeline Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBLNECWGLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $22.08M $83.79M CWGL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.0x 119.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +269.9% +1.5% BLNE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -231.1% 1.0% CWGL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -0.7% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.5x 4.6x BLNE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -79.9% -21.0% CWGL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -13.9%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 105.2% 30.6% CWGL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 16/100 46/100 CWGL

Percentile Scorecard

BLNECWGL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBLNECWGL
Valuation 11 #34 of 38 65 #14 of 38
Growth 16 #28 of 33 25 #25 of 33
Profitability 10 #28 of 31 50 #16 of 31
Financial Health 43 #22 of 38 76 #10 of 38
Shareholder Returns 0 #23 of 23 14 #20 of 23
Overall 16 46
  • BLNE ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • CWGL ranked among 41 companies in Beverages

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBLNECWGLSPY
1 month -24.7%-6.1% -0.8%
3 months -33.0%+3.8% +3.5%
6 months -64.4%-3.9% +7.0%
Year to date -61.0%-15.3% +12.2%
1 year -79.9%-21.0% +13.0%
3 years —-24.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year —-9.0% +23.1%
5 years —-52.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-13.9% +11.0%
10 years —-55.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year —-7.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBLNECWGLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 105.2%30.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 115.8%34.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.610.11 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.76-0.69 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.5%-56.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -81.3%-21.0% -1.8%
52-week high $3.59$5.25 $779.14
52-week low $0.63$3.90 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBLNECWGL
P/E now vs peer median -0.9xmedian 26.6x 121.4xmedian 26.6x
P/S now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 1.5x 1.2xmedian 1.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.8xmedian 14.2x 20.3xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.2xmedian 18.3x -2.7xmedian 18.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 2.6x 0.5xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median -0.01median 2.09 -25.03median 2.09

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBLNECWGL
Revenue $10.02M $72.36M
Gross profit – $32.85M
Operating income -$20.55M -$2.29M
Net income -$21.63M $704.00K
Free cash flow -$18.00M -$31.77M
EPS (diluted) $-0.74 $0.03
Cash & equivalents $1.41M $11.84M
Total debt $10.41M $36.85M
Shares (diluted) 31.41M 20.59M
Enterprise value $14.41M $13.45M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBLNECWGL
P/E -0.9x 121.4x
P/FCF -1.2x -2.7x
P/Operating cash flow -1.2x 9.1x
P/S 2.2x 1.2x
P/B 0.4x 0.5x
P/Tangible book 0.5x 0.5x
EV/EBITDA -1.8x 20.3x
EV/EBIT -1.5x -48.3x
EV/Revenue 3.1x 1.5x
EV/FCF -1.7x -3.5x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.7x 11.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.01 -25.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBLNECWGL
Revenue growth (1Y) 269.9% 1.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.2% 0.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -0.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 0.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -56.6% -199.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -46.5% -59.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -1.2% 143.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -11.5% -6.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 72.6% 143.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 84.3% -4.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -101.3% 292.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -115.9% 45.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -101.3% -1,125%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -112.1% -71.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBLNECWGL
Gross margin – 45.4%
EBITDA margin -172.1% 7.5%
Operating margin -205.0% -3.2%
Pretax margin -212.2% 1.5%
Net margin -231.1% 1.0%
FCF margin -179.5% -43.9%
Operating cash flow margin -179.5% 13.0%
Return on equity -42.7% 0.4%
Return on assets -32.5% 0.3%
Return on invested capital – -0.7%
Return on capital employed -37.9% -1.0%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 13.4x
Stock comp / revenue 20.2% 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBLNECWGL
Debt / assets 16.5% 15.6%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.5x 4.6x
Debt / FCF -0.6x -1.2x
Liabilities / assets 19.8% 21.2%
Equity / assets 80.2% 78.8%
Interest coverage -70.9x -1.6x
Current ratio 1.1x 10.5x
Quick ratio 0.1x 2.1x
Cash ratio 0.1x 1.0x
Altman Z-score -2.85 1.31

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBLNECWGL
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield -16.3% 0.0%
Shareholder yield -16.3% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBLNECWGL
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.01FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year $27.10MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +225.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +143.7% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBLNECWGL
Held by institutions 12.8% 17.4%
Institutions holding 38 5
Change in shares held, QoQ -9.2% +1.4%
Institutions buying 20 2
Institutions selling 7 2
Buyers to sellers 2.86 1.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BLNECWGL
BLNE 1.00 0.03
CWGL 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BLNE and CWGL?

Crimson Wine (CWGL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Beeline Holdings (BLNE) $22.08M, Crimson Wine (CWGL) $83.79M.

Which company is growing faster?

Beeline Holdings (BLNE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Beeline Holdings (BLNE) +269.9%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) +1.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Crimson Wine (CWGL) has the highest net margin (Beeline Holdings (BLNE) -231.1%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) 1.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Crimson Wine (CWGL) returned the most: Beeline Holdings (BLNE) -79.9%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) -21.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Crimson Wine (CWGL) has been the steadiest (Beeline Holdings (BLNE) 105.2%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) 30.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do BLNE and CWGL move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.03, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, BLNE and CWGL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Crimson Wine (CWGL) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.