BLNE vs CWGL vs MGPI Stock Comparison

Beeline Holdings, Crimson Wine and Mgp Ingredients Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BLNE Beeline Holdings, Inc.
$0.71 -20.2% 1M -79.3% 1Y
Market cap
$22.30M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$10.02M
Div. yield
–
Spirits and Wine Consumer Staples
1 win
CWGL Crimson Wine Group, Ltd
$4.01 -9.3% 1M -23.6% 1Y
Market cap
$82.14M
P/E
116.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$72.36M
Div. yield
–
Spirits and Wine Consumer Staples
6 wins
MGPI Mgp Ingredients Inc
$15.32 +19.5% 1M -35.0% 1Y
Market cap
$352.79M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$500.01M
Div. yield
–
Spirits and Wine Consumer Staples
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Crimson Wine leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Crimson Wine 6, Mgp Ingredients 2, Beeline Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBLNECWGLMGPILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $22.30M $82.14M $352.79M MGPI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.0x 116.7x -1.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 9.1x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +269.9% +1.5% -18.0% BLNE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -231.1% 1.0% -48.2% CWGL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -0.7% -26.5% CWGL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.5x 4.6x -1.4x MGPI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -79.3% -23.6% -35.0% CWGL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -14.5%/yr -24.8%/yr CWGL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 105.2% 30.7% 46.1% CWGL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 16/100 45/100 36/100 CWGL

Percentile Scorecard

BLNECWGLMGPI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBLNECWGLMGPI
Valuation 11 #34 of 38 65 #14 of 38 46 #21 of 38
Growth 13 #29 of 33 22 #26 of 33 0 #33 of 33
Profitability 13 #27 of 31 50 #16 of 31 23 #24 of 31
Financial Health 42 #22 of 37 75 #10 of 37 50 #19 of 37
Shareholder Returns 0 #23 of 23 14 #20 of 23 59 #10 of 23
Overall 16 45 36
  • BLNE ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • CWGL ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • MGPI ranked among 41 companies in Beverages

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBLNECWGLMGPISPY
1 month -20.2%-9.3%+19.5% -0.2%
3 months -26.8%+0.2%-18.1% +3.9%
6 months -61.0%-7.4%-24.2% +8.2%
Year to date -58.7%-18.2%-37.0% +12.9%
1 year -79.3%-23.6%-35.0% +12.3%
3 years —-27.1%-83.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year —-10.0%-45.4% +23.3%
5 years —-54.2%-75.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-14.5%-24.8% +10.9%
10 years —-57.8%-56.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year —-8.3%-8.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBLNECWGLMGPISPY
Volatility, 1Y 105.2%30.7%46.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 115.8%35.0%50.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.630.10-0.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.75-0.77-0.76 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.5%-56.9%-89.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -80.2%-23.6%-42.0% -1.2%
52-week high $3.59$5.25$26.40 $779.14
52-week low $0.63$3.90$12.74 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBLNECWGLMGPI
P/E now vs peer median -1.0xmedian 26.1x 117.3xmedian 26.1x -1.4xmedian 26.1x
P/S now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 1.6x 1.1xmedian 1.6x 0.7xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.9xmedian 14.0x 19.7xmedian 14.0x -2.8xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.3xmedian 18.1x -2.6xmedian 18.1x 369.4xmedian 18.1x
P/B now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 2.6x 0.4xmedian 2.6x 0.6xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median -0.01median 2.07 -24.18median 2.07 0.02median 2.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBLNECWGLMGPI
Revenue $10.02M $72.36M $500.01M
Gross profit – $32.85M $177.75M
Operating income -$20.55M -$2.29M -$269.74M
Net income -$21.63M $704.00K -$242.03M
Free cash flow -$18.00M -$31.77M $888.00K
EPS (diluted) $-0.74 $0.03 $-11.23
Cash & equivalents $1.41M $11.84M $17.79M
Total debt $10.41M $36.85M $369.60M
Shares (diluted) 31.41M 20.59M 21.43M
Enterprise value $14.63M $11.80M $292.73M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBLNECWGLMGPI
P/E -1.0x 117.3x -1.4x
P/FCF -1.3x -2.6x 369.4x
P/Operating cash flow -1.3x 8.8x 13.4x
P/S 2.3x 1.1x 0.7x
P/B 0.5x 0.4x 0.6x
P/Tangible book 0.5x 0.4x 0.9x
EV/EBITDA -1.9x 19.7x -2.8x
EV/EBIT -1.6x -47.0x -2.5x
EV/Revenue 3.2x 1.5x 1.4x
EV/FCF -1.8x -3.4x 765.6x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.8x 11.4x 27.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.01 -24.18 0.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBLNECWGLMGPI
Revenue growth (1Y) 269.9% 1.5% -18.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.2% 0.9% -14.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -0.3% -26.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 0.0% -12.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -56.6% -199.9% -1,343%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -46.5% -59.1% -56.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -1.2% 143.6% -3,519%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -11.5% -6.1% -61.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 72.6% 143.6% -3,543%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 84.3% -4.8% -62.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -101.3% 292.2% -81.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -115.9% 45.4% -28.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -101.3% -1,125% -98.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -112.1% -71.7% -53.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBLNECWGLMGPI
Gross margin – 45.4% 35.5%
EBITDA margin -172.1% 7.5% -48.9%
Operating margin -205.0% -3.2% -53.9%
Pretax margin -212.2% 1.5% -55.3%
Net margin -231.1% 1.0% -48.2%
FCF margin -179.5% -43.9% 0.2%
Operating cash flow margin -179.5% 13.0% 4.9%
Return on equity -42.7% 0.4% -41.4%
Return on assets -32.5% 0.3% -23.2%
Return on invested capital – -0.7% -26.5%
Return on capital employed -37.9% -1.0% -27.9%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.3x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 13.4x -0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 20.2% 0.1% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBLNECWGLMGPI
Debt / assets 16.5% 15.6% 34.9%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.2x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.5x 4.6x -1.4x
Debt / FCF -0.6x -1.2x 416.2x
Liabilities / assets 19.8% 21.2% 44.1%
Equity / assets 80.2% 78.8% 55.9%
Interest coverage -70.9x -1.6x –
Current ratio 1.1x 10.5x 7.0x
Quick ratio 0.1x 2.1x 1.6x
Cash ratio 0.1x 1.0x 0.2x
Altman Z-score -2.79 1.27 0.99

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBLNECWGLMGPI
Dividend yield – – 3.1%
Net buyback yield -15.4% 0.0% 0.3%
Shareholder yield -15.4% 0.0% 3.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBLNECWGLMGPI
Forward P/E – – 9.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.01FY2026 – $1.69FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -40.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +21.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $27.10MFY2026 – $463.37MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +225.4%FY2026 – -13.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +143.7% – +2.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBLNECWGLMGPI
Held by institutions 12.8% 17.4% 72.3%
Institutions holding 38 5 149
Change in shares held, QoQ -9.2% +1.4% +0.2%
Institutions buying 20 2 80
Institutions selling 7 2 51
Buyers to sellers 2.86 1.00 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BLNECWGLMGPI
BLNE 1.00 0.02 0.02
CWGL 0.02 1.00 0.00
MGPI 0.02 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BLNE, CWGL and MGPI?

Mgp Ingredients (MGPI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Beeline Holdings (BLNE) $22.30M, Crimson Wine (CWGL) $82.14M, Mgp Ingredients (MGPI) $352.79M.

Which company is growing faster?

Beeline Holdings (BLNE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Beeline Holdings (BLNE) +269.9%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) +1.5%, Mgp Ingredients (MGPI) -18.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Crimson Wine (CWGL) has the highest net margin (Beeline Holdings (BLNE) -231.1%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) 1.0%, Mgp Ingredients (MGPI) -48.2%). On return on invested capital, Crimson Wine (CWGL) leads (Crimson Wine (CWGL) -0.7%, Mgp Ingredients (MGPI) -26.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Crimson Wine (CWGL) returned the most: Beeline Holdings (BLNE) -79.3%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) -23.6%, Mgp Ingredients (MGPI) -35.0%. Over five years, Crimson Wine (CWGL) compounded fastest (Crimson Wine (CWGL) -14.5%/yr, Mgp Ingredients (MGPI) -24.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Crimson Wine (CWGL) has been the steadiest (Beeline Holdings (BLNE) 105.2%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) 30.7%, Mgp Ingredients (MGPI) 46.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BLNE, CWGL and MGPI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Crimson Wine (CWGL) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.