BLNC vs SCHW vs AON Stock Comparison

Balance Labs, Schwab Charles and Aon Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BMO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BLNC Balance Labs, Inc.
$1.55 0.0% 1M -29.5% 1Y
Market cap
$72.62M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
-$10.17K
Div. yield
–
Financial Advisory Financial Services
1 win
SCHW Schwab Charles Corp
$89.46 -9.7% 1M -5.4% 1Y
Market cap
$153.26B
P/E
14.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$27.06B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
6 wins
AON Aon plc
$321.66 +16.6% 1M -1.4% 1Y
Market cap
$68.98B
P/E
17.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.68B
Div. yield
0.01%
Insurance Brokers Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Schwab Charles leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Schwab Charles 6, Aon 1, Balance Labs 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBLNCSCHWAONLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $72.62M $153.26B $68.98B SCHW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.3x 14.9x 17.5x SCHW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 13.4x 17.7x SCHW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +18.1% +3.8% SCHW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 22.2% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 11.6% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.3x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -29.5% -5.4% -1.4% AON
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.2%/yr +1.8%/yr +0.1%/yr BLNC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 54.3% 25.8% 29.5% SCHW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 7/100 43/100 38/100 SCHW

Percentile Scorecard

BLNCSCHWAON

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBLNCSCHWAON
Valuation 11 #162 of 181 14 #309 of 361 10 #107 of 119
Growth 1 #109 of 110 98 #4 of 153 42 #67 of 114
Profitability – – 74 #28 of 106
Financial Health 9 #148 of 162 – 18 #86 of 104
Shareholder Returns – 15 #284 of 335 45 #58 of 105
Overall 7 43 38
  • BLNC ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • SCHW ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • AON ranked among 126 companies in Insurance

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBLNCSCHWAONSPY
1 month 0.0%-9.7%+16.6% +0.7%
3 months 0.0%-14.3%-12.2% +3.7%
6 months 0.0%-2.4%+3.2% +7.1%
Year to date 0.0%-10.5%-8.8% +12.8%
1 year -29.5%-5.4%-1.4% +11.9%
3 years +573.9%+76.3%+4.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year +89.0%+20.8%+1.4% +22.8%
5 years +55.0%+9.1%+0.5% +67.6%
5 years, per year +9.2%+1.8%+0.1% +10.9%
10 years -22.5%+180.5%+189.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year -2.5%+10.9%+11.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBLNCSCHWAONSPY
Volatility, 1Y 54.3%25.8%29.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —29.1%31.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.170.41-0.30 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.54-0.21-0.05 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -85.0%-50.4%-34.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -29.5%-21.3%-15.6% -1.2%
52-week high $2.20$113.68$381.11 $779.14
52-week low $1.11$85.35$269.45 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBLNCSCHWAON
P/E now vs peer median -2.3xmedian 33.5x 15.1xmedian 12.2x 17.4xmedian 10.7x
P/S now vs peer median -7,138xmedian 4.9x 5.7xmedian 3.4x 3.9xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.0x —median 5.3x 14.7xmedian 7.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -164.7xmedian 14.3x 15.9xmedian 10.8x 20.9xmedian 8.5x
P/B now vs peer median -26.2xmedian 1.8x —median 1.2x 6.7xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 0.97 0.58median 1.34 1.51median 0.60

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBLNCSCHWAON
Revenue -$10.17K $27.06B $17.68B
Operating income -$13.94M – $4.65B
Net income -$31.67M – $4.01B
Free cash flow -$440.96K – $3.27B
EPS (diluted) $-0.68 $5.90 $18.46
Cash & equivalents $117.47K – $2.02B
Total debt $1.91M – $28.04B
Shares (diluted) 46.85M 1.74B 213.00M
Enterprise value $71.82M $153.26B $48.18B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBLNCSCHWAON
P/E -2.3x 15.1x 17.4x
P/FCF -164.7x 15.9x 20.9x
P/Operating cash flow -164.7x – 19.1x
P/S -7,138x 5.7x 3.9x
P/B -26.2x – 6.7x
P/Tangible book -26.2x – 14.5x
EV/EBITDA – – 14.7x
EV/EBIT -5.2x – 17.4x
EV/Revenue -7,128x 5.7x 4.6x
EV/FCF -164.5x – 24.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -164.5x – 22.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 0.58 1.51

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBLNCSCHWAON
Revenue growth (1Y) – 18.1% 3.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -140.7% 10.8% 10.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -4,457% – 9.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -533.9% – 5.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -6,739% – 44.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -292.7% – 12.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -3,064% 175.0% 47.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -203.7% 25.9% 11.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -202.7% – 8.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -113.4% – 3.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -202.7% – 7.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -113.4% – 3.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBLNCSCHWAON
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – 31.2%
Operating margin – – 26.3%
Pretax margin – – 28.8%
Net margin – – 22.2%
FCF margin – – 18.5%
Operating cash flow margin 4,334% – 20.2%
Return on equity – – 40.3%
Return on assets -16,393% – 6.8%
Return on invested capital – – 11.6%
Return on capital employed – – 13.6%
Asset turnover -0.1x – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x – 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue -131,374% – 2.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBLNCSCHWAON
Debt / assets 19.7% – 43.0%
Debt / equity 0.0x – 2.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.3x
Debt / FCF -0.1x – 8.6x
Liabilities / assets 2,288% – 84.3%
Equity / assets -2,188% – 15.7%
Interest coverage -119.8x – 6.2x
Current ratio 0.0x – 1.6x
Quick ratio 0.0x – 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.0x – 0.6x
Altman Z-score -790.54 – 1.53

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBLNCSCHWAON
Dividend yield – 1.4% 1.0%
Net buyback yield – – 1.9%
Shareholder yield – 1.4% 2.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 16.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 20.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 9.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 11.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBLNCSCHWAON
Forward P/E – 13.4xFY2026 17.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $6.66FY2026 $18.15FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +36.8%FY2026 +6.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +13.1% +8.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $30.04BFY2026 $19.12BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +25.6%FY2026 +11.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +3.1% +8.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBLNCSCHWAON
Held by institutions – 83.0% 90.5%
Institutions holding – 2,316 1,255
Change in shares held, QoQ – +2.1% +3.1%
Institutions buying – 1,080 604
Institutions selling – 951 448
Buyers to sellers – 1.14 1.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BLNCSCHWAON
BLNC 1.00 -0.02 0.06
SCHW -0.02 1.00 0.18
AON 0.06 0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BLNC, SCHW and AON?

Schwab Charles (SCHW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Balance Labs (BLNC) $72.62M, Schwab Charles (SCHW) $153.26B, Aon (AON) $68.98B.

Which stock is cheaper, BLNC, SCHW and AON?

Schwab Charles (SCHW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Balance Labs (BLNC) -2.3x, Schwab Charles (SCHW) 14.9x, Aon (AON) 17.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Schwab Charles (SCHW) is cheapest (Schwab Charles (SCHW) 13.4x, Aon (AON) 17.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Schwab Charles (SCHW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Schwab Charles (SCHW) +18.1%, Aon (AON) +3.8%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Aon (AON) returned the most: Balance Labs (BLNC) -29.5%, Schwab Charles (SCHW) -5.4%, Aon (AON) -1.4%. Over five years, Balance Labs (BLNC) compounded fastest (Balance Labs (BLNC) +9.2%/yr, Schwab Charles (SCHW) +1.8%/yr, Aon (AON) +0.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Schwab Charles (SCHW) 0.00%, Aon (AON) 0.01%. Balance Labs (BLNC) and Schwab Charles (SCHW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Schwab Charles (SCHW) has been the steadiest (Balance Labs (BLNC) 54.3%, Schwab Charles (SCHW) 25.8%, Aon (AON) 29.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BLNC, SCHW and AON?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Schwab Charles (SCHW) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.