BLMN vs TXRH vs PC Stock Comparison

Bloomin' Brands, Texas Roadhouse and Premium Catering (Holdings) Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BJRI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BLMN Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
$9.08 +15.2% 1M +17.9% 1Y
Market cap
$777.38M
P/E
28.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.98B
Div. yield
–
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
TXRH Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
$166.71 +4.4% 1M -4.4% 1Y
Market cap
$10.93B
P/E
26.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.23B
Div. yield
1.76%
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
8 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Texas Roadhouse leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Texas Roadhouse 8, Bloomin' Brands 2, Premium Catering (Holdings) 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBLMNTXRHPCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $777.38M $10.93B $274.48M TXRH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.1x 26.5x — TXRH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.9x 24.8x — BLMN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.2% +9.9% — TXRH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.7% 6.6% — TXRH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.2% 26.0% — TXRH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.5x -0.2x — TXRH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 1.76% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +17.9% -4.4% 0.0% BLMN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -15.7%/yr +13.2%/yr — TXRH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.6% 31.0% 0.0% PC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 60/100 — TXRH

Percentile Scorecard

BLMNTXRHPC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBLMNTXRHPC
Valuation 86 #8 of 50 35 #33 of 50 –
Growth 33 #32 of 47 54 #22 of 47 –
Profitability 44 #26 of 46 78 #11 of 46 –
Financial Health 18 #42 of 51 72 #15 of 51 94 #4 of 51
Shareholder Returns 28 #24 of 33 59 #14 of 33 –
Overall 42 60 –
  • BLMN ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • TXRH ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • PC ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBLMNTXRHPCSPY
1 month +15.2%+4.4%0.0% -0.2%
3 months +5.6%-18.6%0.0% +3.9%
6 months +50.6%+5.3%0.0% +8.2%
Year to date +47.2%+0.4%0.0% +12.9%
1 year +17.9%-4.4%0.0% +12.3%
3 years -60.9%+70.6%— +87.4%
3 years, per year -26.9%+19.5%— +23.3%
5 years -57.5%+85.5%— +67.9%
5 years, per year -15.7%+13.2%— +10.9%
10 years -46.3%+324.7%— +261.1%
10 years, per year -6.0%+15.6%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBLMNTXRHPCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.6%31.0%0.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.3%27.9%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.190.200.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.24-0.14— 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.3%-27.3%-87.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -23.4%-22.2%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $11.85$214.28$9.40 $779.14
52-week low $5.26$155.88$9.40 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBLMNTXRHPC
P/E now vs peer median 28.1xmedian 20.6x 26.5xmedian 20.6x —median 20.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 1.2x 1.8xmedian 1.2x —median 1.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.6xmedian 13.3x 15.3xmedian 13.3x —median 13.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 17.3x 26.9xmedian 17.3x —median 17.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 3.1x 6.9xmedian 3.1x 28.0xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median -0.56median 1.07 2.02median 1.07 —median 1.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBLMNTXRHPC
Revenue $3.98B $6.23B –
Gross profit $2.79B – –
Operating income $47.65M $482.80M –
Net income $32.19M $422.09M –
Free cash flow $155.17M $406.39M –
EPS (diluted) $0.32 $6.27 –
Cash & equivalents $66.61M $202.43M $971.86K
Total debt $702.79M $50.00M –
Shares (diluted) 86.22M 65.92M 29.20M
Enterprise value $516.76M $10.30B $270.03M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBLMNTXRHPC
P/E 28.1x 26.5x –
P/FCF 5.0x 26.9x –
P/Operating cash flow 2.4x 13.6x –
P/S 0.2x 1.8x –
P/B 1.8x 6.9x 28.0x
P/Tangible book 66.4x 7.0x 28.0x
EV/EBITDA 5.6x 15.3x –
EV/EBIT 29.7x 22.3x –
EV/Revenue 0.4x 1.7x –
EV/FCF 9.1x 26.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow 4.4x 13.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.56 2.02 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBLMNTXRHPC
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.2% 9.9% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.7% 12.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.2% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.7% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -57.4% -7.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -45.7% 12.3% –
Net income growth (1Y) 2,049% -5.8% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -49.9% 12.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) 648.7% -4.7% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -50.0% 13.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 36.1% 8.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -11.4% 17.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 305.4% 8.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.3% 24.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBLMNTXRHPC
Gross margin 70.1% – –
EBITDA margin 6.3% 11.3% –
Operating margin 1.2% 7.7% –
Pretax margin 0.0% 7.8% –
Net margin 0.7% 6.6% –
FCF margin 3.9% 6.5% –
Operating cash flow margin 8.0% 12.9% –
Return on equity 7.9% 27.1% –
Return on assets 1.1% 11.6% –
Return on invested capital 4.2% 26.0% –
Return on capital employed 2.1% 17.0% –
Asset turnover 1.3x 1.7x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 9.9x 1.9x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% 0.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBLMNTXRHPC
Debt / assets 22.5% 1.4% –
Debt / equity 1.6x 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.5x -0.2x –
Debt / FCF 4.5x 0.1x –
Liabilities / assets 86.0% 57.0% 13.7%
Equity / assets 14.0% 43.0% 86.3%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.3x 0.5x 9.6x
Quick ratio 0.1x 0.3x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.3x 0.9x
Altman Z-score 0.89 5.72 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBLMNTXRHPC
Dividend yield 0.0% 1.8% –
Net buyback yield – 1.5% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 3.2% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 39.6% 44.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 8.2% 46.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) -80.7% 9.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -42.4% 11.7% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBLMNTXRHPC
Forward P/E 9.9xFY2026 24.8xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.92FY2026 $6.71FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -18.6%FY2026 +10.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +16.3% +10.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.75BFY2026 $6.74BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY -5.4%FY2026 +14.7%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +3.2% +8.4% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBLMNTXRHPC
Held by institutions 100.0% 99.0% –
Institutions holding 234 646 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.7% -1.0% –
Institutions buying 123 311 –
Institutions selling 76 249 –
Buyers to sellers 1.62 1.25 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BLMNTXRHPC
BLMN 1.00 0.48 –
TXRH 0.48 1.00 –
PC – – –

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BLMN, TXRH and PC?

Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) $777.38M, Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) $10.93B, Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) $274.48M.

Which stock is cheaper, BLMN, TXRH and PC?

Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 28.1x, Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) 26.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) is cheapest (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 9.9x, Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) 24.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) +1.2%, Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) +9.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) has the highest net margin (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 0.7%, Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) 6.6%). On return on invested capital, Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) leads (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 4.2%, Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) 26.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) returned the most: Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) +17.9%, Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) -4.4%, Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) 0.0%. Over five years, Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) compounded fastest (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) -15.7%/yr, Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) +13.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 0.00%, Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) 1.76%, Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) 0.00%. Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) and Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) has been the steadiest (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 74.6%, Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) 31.0%, Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) 0.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BLMN, TXRH and PC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.