BLMN vs PC vs WW Stock Comparison

Bloomin' Brands, Premium Catering (Holdings) and Ww International Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DRI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BLMN Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
$9.99 +26.3% 1M +33.0% 1Y
Market cap
$855.29M
P/E
30.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.98B
Div. yield
–
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
WW Ww International, Inc.
$14.39 -4.3% 1M -58.5% 1Y
Market cap
$143.85M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Personal Services Consumer Discretionary

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

Bloomin' Brands leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Bloomin' Brands 2, Premium Catering (Holdings) 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBLMNPCWWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $855.29M $274.48M $143.85M BLMN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.9x — — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.9x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.2% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.7% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.2% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.5x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +33.0% 0.0% -58.5% BLMN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.3%/yr — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 75.1% 0.0% 94.9% PC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 41/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

BLMNPCWW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBLMNPCWW
Valuation 84 #9 of 50 – –
Growth 33 #32 of 47 – –
Profitability 44 #26 of 46 – –
Financial Health 16 #43 of 51 94 #4 of 51 39 #23 of 37
Shareholder Returns 29 #23 of 32 – –
Overall 41 – –
  • BLMN ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • PC ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • WW ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBLMNPCWWSPY
1 month +26.3%0.0%-4.3% +0.9%
3 months +13.4%0.0%+10.7% +5.9%
6 months +66.2%0.0%+42.1% +8.5%
Year to date +61.9%0.0%-50.8% +13.3%
1 year +33.0%0.0%-58.5% +12.4%
3 years -57.0%—— +88.1%
3 years, per year -24.5%—— +23.5%
5 years -53.8%—— +68.2%
5 years, per year -14.3%—— +11.0%
10 years -42.2%—— +263.4%
10 years, per year -5.3%—— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureBLMNPCWWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 75.1%0.0%94.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.5%—98.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.220.002.60 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.44—-0.62 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.3%-87.3%-79.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.7%0.0%-58.8% -0.9%
52-week high $11.85$9.40$34.92 $779.14
52-week low $5.26$9.40$9.12 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBLMNPCWW
P/E now vs peer median 30.9xmedian 20.8x —median 20.8x —median 14.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 1.1x —median 1.1x —median 1.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.0xmedian 13.0x —median 13.0x —median 9.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 17.6x —median 17.6x —median 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 3.2x 28.0xmedian 3.2x 0.5xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median -0.62median 1.08 —median 1.08 —median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBLMNPCWW
Revenue $3.98B – –
Gross profit $2.79B – –
Operating income $47.65M – –
Net income $32.19M – –
Free cash flow $155.17M – –
EPS (diluted) $0.32 – –
Cash & equivalents $66.61M $971.86K $160.28M
Total debt $702.79M – $465.47M
Shares (diluted) 86.22M 29.20M 9.99M
Enterprise value $594.67M $270.03M -$563.51M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBLMNPCWW
P/E 30.9x – –
P/FCF 5.5x – –
P/Operating cash flow 2.7x – –
P/S 0.2x – –
P/B 2.0x 28.0x 0.5x
P/Tangible book 73.0x 28.0x -0.8x
EV/EBITDA 6.0x – –
EV/EBIT 31.3x – –
EV/Revenue 0.4x – –
EV/FCF 9.6x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 4.7x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.62 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBLMNPCWW
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.2% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.7% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.2% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.7% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -57.4% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -45.7% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 2,049% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -49.9% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 648.7% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -50.0% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 36.1% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -11.4% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 305.4% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.3% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBLMNPCWW
Gross margin 70.1% – –
EBITDA margin 6.3% – –
Operating margin 1.2% – –
Pretax margin 0.0% – –
Net margin 0.7% – –
FCF margin 3.9% – –
Operating cash flow margin 8.0% – –
Return on equity 7.9% – –
Return on assets 1.1% – –
Return on invested capital 4.2% – –
Return on capital employed 2.1% – –
Asset turnover 1.3x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 9.9x – –
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBLMNPCWW
Debt / assets 22.5% – 49.2%
Debt / equity 1.6x – 1.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.5x – –
Debt / FCF 4.5x – –
Liabilities / assets 86.0% 13.7% 66.4%
Equity / assets 14.0% 86.3% 33.6%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.3x 9.6x 1.7x
Quick ratio 0.1x 1.0x 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.9x 1.3x
Altman Z-score 0.91 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBLMNPCWW
Dividend yield 0.0% – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 39.6% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 8.2% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -80.7% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -42.4% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBLMNPCWW
Forward P/E 10.9xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.92FY2026 – $-3.38FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -18.6%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +16.3% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.75BFY2026 – $656.64MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.4%FY2026 – -7.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.2% – -9.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBLMNPCWW
Held by institutions 100.0% – 77.9%
Institutions holding 234 – 78
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.7% – +8.1%
Institutions buying 123 – 35
Institutions selling 76 – 17
Buyers to sellers 1.62 – 2.06

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BLMNPCWW
BLMN 1.00 – 0.08
PC – – –
WW 0.08 – 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BLMN, PC and WW?

Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) $855.29M, Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) $274.48M, Ww International (WW) $143.85M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) returned the most: Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) +33.0%, Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) 0.0%, Ww International (WW) -58.5%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) has been the steadiest (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 75.1%, Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) 0.0%, Ww International (WW) 94.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BLMN, PC and WW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.