BLLN vs CCEL vs GH Stock Comparison

BillionToOne, Cryo Cell International and Guardant Health Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TEM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BLLN BillionToOne, Inc.
$114.07 -7.3% 1M
Market cap
$5.37B
P/E
178.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$397.41M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Labs Healthcare
4 wins
GH Guardant Health, Inc.
$178.06 +0.5% 1M +151.3% 1Y
Market cap
$24.63B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.18B
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Labs Healthcare
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Guardant Health leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Guardant Health 4, BillionToOne 4, Cryo Cell International 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBLLNCCELGHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.37B $39.99M $24.63B GH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 178.7x -20.6x -54.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 150.1x 45.0x — CCEL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +90.1% -2.0% +42.7% BLLN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.6% -6.2% -38.3% BLLN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.0% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -9.1x 4.1x — BLLN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — +8.3% +151.3% GH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -17.1%/yr +8.5%/yr GH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 94.5% 72.2% 57.4% GH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 45/100 28/100 BLLN

Percentile Scorecard

BLLNCCELGH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBLLNCCELGH
Valuation 20 #74 of 92 82 #17 of 92 18 #76 of 92
Growth 100 #1 of 87 5 #83 of 87 49 #45 of 87
Profitability 60 #35 of 86 54 #40 of 86 7 #80 of 86
Financial Health 97 #4 of 97 24 #74 of 97 52 #47 of 97
Shareholder Returns 7 #52 of 56 60 #23 of 56 15 #48 of 56
Overall 57 45 28
  • BLLN ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • CCEL ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • GH ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBLLNCCELGHSPY
1 month -7.3%+22.8%+0.5% -0.2%
3 months -14.6%+44.7%+24.0% +3.9%
6 months +45.8%+42.7%+114.3% +8.2%
Year to date +39.4%+43.9%+74.3% +12.9%
1 year —+8.3%+151.3% +12.3%
3 years —+3.3%+613.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+1.1%+92.6% +23.3%
5 years —-60.7%+50.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-17.1%+8.5% +10.9%
10 years —+20.7%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+1.9%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBLLNCCELGHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 94.5%72.2%57.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 107.8%76.7%48.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.660.551.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —0.122.64 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.8%-79.2%-86.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -23.9%-1.2%-4.9% -1.2%
52-week high $149.97$5.01$187.22 $779.14
52-week low $64.03$2.89$69.58 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBLLNCCELGH
P/E now vs peer median 176.1xmedian 24.6x -20.5xmedian 24.6x -52.2xmedian 24.6x
P/S now vs peer median 13.4xmedian 1.6x 1.3xmedian 1.6x 20.1xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 97.2xmedian 14.6x 37.9xmedian 14.6x -52.7xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 161.0xmedian 21.6x 8.6xmedian 21.6x -98.8xmedian 21.6x
P/B now vs peer median 10.0xmedian 3.2x -2.4xmedian 3.2x -106.8xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.66 0.50median 0.66 -5.25median 0.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBLLNCCELGH
Revenue $397.41M $31.13M $1.18B
Gross profit $283.22M $24.45M $769.16M
Operating income $43.30M $189.42K -$470.26M
Net income $37.71M -$1.95M -$453.44M
Free cash flow $33.18M $4.65M -$240.72M
R&D $59.21M $303.95K $375.79M
EPS (diluted) $0.55 $-0.24 $-3.41
Cash & equivalents $548.63M $1.43M $1.05B
Total debt $91.03M $40.59M –
Shares (diluted) 54.46M 8.07M 132.87M
Enterprise value $3.59B $26.40M $20.69B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBLLNCCELGH
P/E 176.1x -20.5x -52.2x
P/FCF 161.0x 8.6x -98.8x
P/Operating cash flow 117.8x 8.1x -128.5x
P/S 13.4x 1.3x 20.1x
P/B 10.0x -2.4x -106.8x
P/Tangible book 10.0x -2.3x -95.9x
EV/EBITDA 97.2x 37.9x -52.7x
EV/EBIT 112.8x 236.5x -48.4x
EV/Revenue 12.3x 1.4x 19.2x
EV/FCF 147.2x 9.6x -94.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 107.7x 9.1x -122.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.50 -5.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBLLNCCELGH
Revenue growth (1Y) 90.1% -2.0% 42.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -0.1% 32.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 122.4% -0.1% 47.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 2.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 253.2% -95.6% -2.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -64.6% 4.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 223.2% -310.8% -9.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -40.5% 3.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 118.7% -311.2% -2.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -41.0% 9.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -22.6% 22.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -15.0% 18.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -24.8% 11.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 17.0% 14.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBLLNCCELGH
Gross margin 71.3% 78.5% 65.0%
EBITDA margin 12.6% 3.8% -36.5%
Operating margin 10.9% 0.6% -39.7%
Pretax margin 9.5% -6.1% -38.4%
Net margin 7.6% -6.2% -38.3%
FCF margin 8.3% 14.9% -20.3%
Operating cash flow margin 11.4% 15.8% -15.7%
Return on equity 7.2% – –
Return on assets 5.3% -3.2% -23.7%
Return on invested capital 7.0% – –
Return on capital employed 6.6% 0.4% -29.9%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.5x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x -2.5x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue 6.4% 1.2% 16.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBLLNCCELGH
Debt / assets 12.5% 14.6% –
Debt / equity 0.2x -0.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA -9.1x 4.1x –
Debt / FCF 2.7x 2.0x –
Liabilities / assets 26.4% 126.3% 111.7%
Equity / assets 73.6% -26.3% -11.7%
Interest coverage 1,056x 0.1x -97.6x
Current ratio 11.7x 0.9x 4.0x
Quick ratio 11.2x 0.8x 3.5x
Cash ratio 9.8x 0.3x 3.1x
Altman Z-score 17.86 -0.05 4.77

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBLLNCCELGH
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -5.7% 0.4% -1.7%
Shareholder yield -5.7% 0.4% -1.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBLLNCCELGH
Forward P/E 150.1xFY2026 45.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.76FY2026 $0.11FY2026 $-3.33FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +442.9%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +22.4% -81.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $481.76MFY2026 $29.11MFY2026 $1.42BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +57.9%FY2026 -7.9%FY2026 +44.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +27.1% +1.1% +27.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBLLNCCELGH
Held by institutions 32.6% 6.9% 100.0%
Institutions holding 155 12 594
Change in shares held, QoQ +34.7% +4.2% -2.6%
Institutions buying 127 6 353
Institutions selling 13 2 180
Buyers to sellers 9.77 3.00 1.96

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BLLNCCELGH
BLLN 1.00 0.04 0.30
CCEL 0.04 1.00 0.10
GH 0.30 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BLLN, CCEL and GH?

Guardant Health (GH) is the largest by market capitalisation: BillionToOne (BLLN) $5.37B, Cryo Cell International (CCEL) $39.99M, Guardant Health (GH) $24.63B.

Which company is growing faster?

BillionToOne (BLLN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: BillionToOne (BLLN) +90.1%, Cryo Cell International (CCEL) -2.0%, Guardant Health (GH) +42.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

BillionToOne (BLLN) has the highest net margin (BillionToOne (BLLN) 7.6%, Cryo Cell International (CCEL) -6.2%, Guardant Health (GH) -38.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Guardant Health (GH) returned the most: Cryo Cell International (CCEL) +8.3%, Guardant Health (GH) +151.3%. Over five years, Guardant Health (GH) compounded fastest (Cryo Cell International (CCEL) -17.1%/yr, Guardant Health (GH) +8.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Guardant Health (GH) has been the steadiest (BillionToOne (BLLN) 94.5%, Cryo Cell International (CCEL) 72.2%, Guardant Health (GH) 57.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BLLN, CCEL and GH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Guardant Health (GH) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.