BLK vs GS vs MUFG Stock Comparison

BlackRock, Goldman Sachs and Mitsubishi Ufj Financial Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SLV) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BLK BlackRock, Inc.
$1,161.10 +9.6% 1M +8.6% 1Y
Market cap
$189.76B
P/E
28.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$27.30B
Div. yield
0.02%
Asset Management Financial Services
2 wins
GS Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$895.85 -0.8% 1M +14.0% 1Y
Market cap
$274.53B
P/E
12.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$69.70B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Goldman Sachs leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Goldman Sachs 5, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial 4, BlackRock 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBLKGSMUFGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $189.76B $274.53B $250.56B GS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.3x 12.9x 16.6x GS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.8x 11.9x 12.4x GS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.5% +18.7% -12.0% BLK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 24.6% 30.6% 47.7% MUFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.9% 13.9% 3.7% GS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.1x -5.6x — GS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +8.6% +14.0% +40.1% MUFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.0%/yr +17.0%/yr +30.5%/yr MUFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.6% 32.1% 26.4% MUFG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 36/100 36/100 BLK

Percentile Scorecard

BLKGSMUFG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBLKGSMUFG
Valuation 67 #67 of 200 15 #305 of 360 27 #262 of 360
Growth 59 #48 of 116 50 #172 of 344 74 #89 of 344
Profitability 70 #44 of 143 17 #288 of 345 62 #131 of 345
Financial Health 64 #60 of 166 12 #298 of 339 4 #326 of 339
Shareholder Returns 29 #57 of 80 87 #47 of 352 11 #314 of 352
Overall 58 36 36
  • BLK ranked among 210 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • GS ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • MUFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBLKGSMUFGSPY
1 month +9.6%-0.8%-6.8% -2.0%
3 months +2.7%-15.0%-2.5% -2.2%
6 months +10.7%-2.5%+19.7% +4.2%
Year to date +8.5%+1.9%+34.0% +10.6%
1 year +8.6%+14.0%+40.1% +10.4%
3 years +76.5%+173.4%+141.9% +73.6%
3 years, per year +20.9%+39.9%+34.3% +20.2%
5 years +21.7%+119.5%+278.3% +61.6%
5 years, per year +4.0%+17.0%+30.5% +10.1%
10 years +240.4%+408.4%+320.2% +261.3%
10 years, per year +13.0%+17.7%+15.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBLKGSMUFGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.6%32.1%26.4% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 27.6%32.8%26.5% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.221.660.93 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.310.441.52 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -45.3%-31.5%-35.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.9%-22.2%-11.9% -3.2%
52-week high $1,183.85$1,152.07$24.14 $779.14
52-week low $922.90$773.70$14.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBLKGSMUFG
P/E now vs peer median 26.9xmedian 33.9x 12.4xmedian 12.4x 16.1xmedian 12.4x
P/S now vs peer median 6.6xmedian 4.7x 3.7xmedian 3.5x 8.0xmedian 3.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.2xmedian 12.0x -3.0xmedian 4.9x —median 4.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 51.2xmedian 14.4x -6.5xmedian 11.0x —median 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 1.8x 2.1xmedian 1.2x 2.3xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.88 0.25median 1.33 0.27median 1.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBLKGSMUFG
Revenue $27.30B $69.70B $31.62B
Gross profit – – $29.85B
Operating income $8.89B – $18.02B
Net income $7.13B $22.17B $13.97B
Free cash flow $3.52B -$39.98B –
EPS (diluted) $40.71 $70.77 $1.32
Cash & equivalents $10.49B $176.77B –
Total debt $12.74B $444.82B $112.96B
Shares (diluted) 164.65M 301.10M 11.40B
Enterprise value $135.89B -$3.47T -$90.83B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBLKGSMUFG
P/E 26.9x 12.4x 16.1x
P/FCF 51.2x -6.5x –
P/Operating cash flow 45.7x -6.8x –
P/S 6.6x 3.7x 8.0x
P/B 3.1x 2.1x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 5.9x 2.1x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA 17.2x -3.0x –
EV/EBIT 20.1x -3.1x 4.6x
EV/Revenue 6.6x -4.4x 2.6x
EV/FCF 50.9x 7.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow 45.4x 8.1x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.25 0.27

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBLKGSMUFG
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.5% 18.7% -12.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 15.3% -2.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 38.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 7.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 18.4% – 24.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 12.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 9.2% 33.0% 62.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 41.4% 32.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -0.6% 40.7% 104.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 49.9% 59.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -7.0% -311.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -29.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -9.5% -353.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -26.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBLKGSMUFG
Gross margin – – 94.4%
EBITDA margin 38.0% 144.7% –
Operating margin 32.6% – 57.0%
Pretax margin 33.6% 40.0% 59.6%
Net margin 24.6% 30.6% 47.7%
FCF margin 12.9% -57.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 14.4% -54.3% –
Return on equity 12.4% 17.9% 11.7%
Return on assets 4.1% 1.0% 0.5%
Return on invested capital 9.9% 13.9% 3.7%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x -1.7x –
Stock comp / revenue 5.4% 5.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBLKGSMUFG
Debt / assets 7.2% 20.4% 4.2%
Debt / equity 0.2x 3.6x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.1x -5.6x –
Debt / FCF 3.6x -11.1x –
Liabilities / assets 67.1% 94.3% 96.0%
Equity / assets 32.9% 5.7% 4.0%
Interest coverage 16.4x 1.4x 0.6x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBLKGSMUFG
Dividend yield 1.9% 2.0% 1.5%
Net buyback yield -0.1% 5.9% –
Shareholder yield 1.8% 8.0% 1.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) 50.6% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 102.6% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBLKGSMUFG
Forward P/E 18.8xFY2026 11.9xFY2026 12.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $61.68FY2026 $75.07FY2026 $1.71FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +28.3%FY2026 +46.3%FY2026 +27.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -1.8% -6.8% +0.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $28.40BFY2026 $68.80BFY2026 $44.38BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +17.3%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026 +18.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +17.3% +4.5% +4.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBLKGSMUFG
Held by institutions 77.6% 72.1% 3.0%
Institutions holding 2,315 3,153 576
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.5% +1.1% -0.1%
Institutions buying 1,090 1,555 325
Institutions selling 887 1,125 161
Buyers to sellers 1.23 1.38 2.02

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BLKGSMUFG
BLK 1.00 0.55 0.35
GS 0.55 1.00 0.47
MUFG 0.35 0.47 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BLK, GS and MUFG?

Goldman Sachs (GS) is the largest by market capitalisation: BlackRock (BLK) $189.76B, Goldman Sachs (GS) $274.53B, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) $250.56B.

Which stock is cheaper, BLK, GS and MUFG?

Goldman Sachs (GS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (BlackRock (BLK) 28.3x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.9x, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 16.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Goldman Sachs (GS) is cheapest (BlackRock (BLK) 18.8x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 11.9x, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 12.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

BlackRock (BLK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: BlackRock (BLK) +26.5%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +18.7%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) -12.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has the highest net margin (BlackRock (BLK) 24.6%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 30.6%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 47.7%). On return on invested capital, Goldman Sachs (GS) leads (BlackRock (BLK) 9.9%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 13.9%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 3.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) returned the most: BlackRock (BLK) +8.6%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +14.0%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +40.1%. Over five years, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) compounded fastest (BlackRock (BLK) +4.0%/yr, Goldman Sachs (GS) +17.0%/yr, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +30.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: BlackRock (BLK) 0.02%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 0.00%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 0.00%. Goldman Sachs (GS) and Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has been the steadiest (BlackRock (BLK) 27.6%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 32.1%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 26.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BLK, GS and MUFG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Goldman Sachs (GS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.