BHC vs ELTP vs GRML Stock Comparison

Bausch Health Companies, Elite Pharmaceuticals and Greenland Mines Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TEVA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GRML Greenland Mines Ltd
$5.14 -50.5% 1M +895.7% 1Y
Market cap
$11.45M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Elite Pharmaceuticals leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Elite Pharmaceuticals 3, Bausch Health Companies 1, Greenland Mines 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBHCELTPGRMLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.09B $247.66M $11.45M BHC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -3.7x 4.4x -0.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 1.8x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +33.7% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 40.2% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 29.2% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -1.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +50.7% -61.7% +895.7% GRML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -20.6%/yr +41.9%/yr — ELTP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 60.6% 57.5% 444.8% ELTP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 89/100 33/100 ELTP

Percentile Scorecard

BHCELTPGRML

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBHCELTPGRML
Valuation 97 #19 of 624 99 #10 of 624 13 #546 of 624
Growth 34 #399 of 601 92 #52 of 601 2 #587 of 601
Profitability – 91 #48 of 541 69 #171 of 541
Financial Health – 76 #157 of 647 77 #147 of 647
Shareholder Returns – 86 #53 of 359 5 #342 of 359
Overall – 89 33
  • BHC ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • ELTP ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • GRML ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBHCELTPGRMLSPY
1 month +53.3%0.0%-50.5% +0.7%
3 months +47.4%-37.8%+2,470.0% +3.7%
6 months +55.4%-32.4%+967.5% +7.1%
Year to date +27.9%-53.1%+1,678.5% +12.8%
1 year +50.7%-61.7%+895.7% +11.9%
3 years +32.9%+91.7%-51.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +9.9%+24.2%-21.7% +22.8%
5 years -68.3%+475.0%— +67.6%
5 years, per year -20.6%+41.9%— +10.9%
10 years -56.3%+35.3%— +262.0%
10 years, per year -7.9%+3.1%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBHCELTPGRMLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 60.6%57.5%444.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.7%72.3%158.6% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.830.712.77 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.84-1.072.01 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -84.9%-71.4%-99.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-66.2%-65.5% -1.2%
52-week high $8.89$0.68$14.89 $779.14
52-week low $4.43$0.22$0.17 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBHCELTPGRML
P/E now vs peer median -4.0xmedian 17.8x 4.4xmedian 17.8x -0.6xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 9.1x 1.8xmedian 9.1x —median 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 15.0x 5.8xmedian 15.0x —median 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 21.7x 14.1xmedian 21.7x -0.9xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median —median 2.2x 2.4xmedian 2.2x 0.2xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.72median 0.35 0.04median 0.35 0.01median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBHCELTPGRML
Revenue – $141.01M –
Gross profit – $61.31M –
Operating income $1.25B $34.94M -$18.67M
Net income – $56.67M -$21.77M
Free cash flow – $17.53M -$14.22M
R&D $638.00M $6.10M $1.28M
EPS (diluted) $-2.22 $0.05 $-8.60
Cash & equivalents – $39.42M $9.34M
Total debt – $9.58M $2.07M
Shares (diluted) 378.10M 1.13B 2.53M
Enterprise value $3.09B $129.33M -$22.42M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBHCELTPGRML
P/E -4.0x 4.4x -0.6x
P/FCF 1.5x 14.1x -0.9x
P/Operating cash flow – 13.0x -0.9x
P/S 0.2x 1.8x –
P/B – 2.4x 0.2x
P/Tangible book – 2.5x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA – 5.8x –
EV/EBIT – 6.0x -0.2x
EV/Revenue – 1.5x –
EV/FCF – 12.0x -0.3x
EV/Operating cash flow – 11.1x -0.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.72 0.04 0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBHCELTPGRML
Revenue growth (1Y) – 33.7% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 58.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 4.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 53.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -34.3% -6.7% -127.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 50.6% 101.7% -166.2%
Net income growth (1Y) – 624.0% -91.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 134.4% -125.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -330.7% 596.0% 48.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 5.5% 118.3% -48.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -0.2% -158.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 152.2% -236.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -2.8% -158.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 81.0% -236.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBHCELTPGRML
Gross margin – 43.5% –
EBITDA margin – 25.9% –
Operating margin – 24.8% –
Pretax margin – 46.2% –
Net margin – 40.2% –
FCF margin – 12.4% –
Operating cash flow margin – 13.5% –
Return on equity – 55.6% -39.8%
Return on assets – 40.8% -34.9%
Return on invested capital – 29.2% –
Return on capital employed – 32.2% -30.5%
Asset turnover – 1.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.3x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBHCELTPGRML
Debt / assets – 1.7% 0.5%
Debt / equity – 0.0x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -1.0x –
Debt / FCF – 0.1x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets – 24.9% 10.9%
Equity / assets – 75.1% 89.1%
Interest coverage – 69.4x -2,872x
Current ratio – 3.8x 10.1x
Quick ratio – 3.0x 7.7x
Cash ratio – 1.3x 7.7x
Altman Z-score – 6.12 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBHCELTPGRML
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -0.1% -55.8%
Shareholder yield 0.0% -0.1% -55.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBHCELTPGRML
Forward P/E 1.8xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $4.86FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY +26.9%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after -13.4% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.45BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +11.9%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after -0.5% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBHCELTPGRML
Held by institutions 63.3% 0.0% 12.0%
Institutions holding 221 1 47
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.9% – +96.3%
Institutions buying 99 1 34
Institutions selling 63 0 2
Buyers to sellers 1.57 – 17.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BHCELTPGRML
BHC 1.00 -0.02 0.07
ELTP -0.02 1.00 -0.04
GRML 0.07 -0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BHC, ELTP and GRML?

Bausch Health Companies (BHC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bausch Health Companies (BHC) $3.09B, Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) $247.66M, Greenland Mines (GRML) $11.45M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Greenland Mines (GRML) returned the most: Bausch Health Companies (BHC) +50.7%, Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) -61.7%, Greenland Mines (GRML) +895.7%. Over five years, Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) compounded fastest (Bausch Health Companies (BHC) -20.6%/yr, Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) +41.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) has been the steadiest (Bausch Health Companies (BHC) 60.6%, Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) 57.5%, Greenland Mines (GRML) 444.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BHC, ELTP and GRML?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.