BGICF vs BMHL vs FOSL Stock Comparison

Birks, Bluemount Holdings and Fossil Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CODI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BGICF Birks Group Inc.
$0.26 -3.7% 1M -77.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.53M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Jewelry Consumer Discretionary
FOSL Fossil Group, Inc.
$6.69 -1.6% 1M +224.8% 1Y
Market cap
$445.13M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$985.17M
Div. yield
–
Jewelry Consumer Discretionary
3 wins

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Fossil leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Fossil 3, Bluemount Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBGICFBMHLFOSLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.53M $78.25M $445.13M FOSL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.1x 32.6x -6.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — -9.1% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — -7.1% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -2.0% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 21.2x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -77.0% -8.5% +224.8% FOSL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -39.5%/yr — -13.3%/yr FOSL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 141.9% 64.9% 73.0% BMHL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — — 21/100 –

Percentile Scorecard

BGICFBMHLFOSL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBGICFBMHLFOSL
Valuation 33 #32 of 47 8 #105 of 114 20 #38 of 47
Growth – – 18 #37 of 45
Profitability – – 21 #35 of 44
Financial Health 6 #49 of 52 46 #68 of 126 26 #39 of 52
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall – – 21
  • BGICF ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • BMHL ranked among 131 companies in Business Services
  • FOSL ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBGICFBMHLFOSLSPY
1 month -3.7%-27.2%-1.6% -2.0%
3 months -48.0%-44.0%+9.9% -2.2%
6 months -62.3%-11.3%+55.2% +4.2%
Year to date -71.1%-6.0%+77.9% +10.6%
1 year -77.0%-8.5%+224.8% +10.4%
3 years -93.0%—+271.7% +73.6%
3 years, per year -58.8%—+54.9% +20.2%
5 years -91.8%—-51.1% +61.6%
5 years, per year -39.5%—-13.3% +10.1%
10 years -79.0%—-72.9% +261.3%
10 years, per year -14.5%—-12.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBGICFBMHLFOSLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 141.9%64.9%73.0% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 141.1%74.1%64.9% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.380.352.08 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.54-0.133.08 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.5%-51.1%-95.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -77.2%-49.2%-7.3% -3.2%
52-week high $1.14$6.16$7.22 $779.14
52-week low $0.15$3.01$1.79 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBGICFBMHLFOSL
P/E now vs peer median -2.1xmedian 16.3x 32.6xmedian 20.8x -5.7xmedian 16.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 0.8x 9,835xmedian 0.9x 0.4xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.2x —median 11.9x 88.7xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -3.3xmedian 11.3x -16,285xmedian 15.0x -9.6xmedian 11.3x
P/B now vs peer median -0.3xmedian 2.3x 7,095xmedian 2.4x 4.4xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.55 —median 1.08 -1.23median 0.55

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBGICFBMHLFOSL
Revenue – – $985.17M
Gross profit – – $558.92M
Operating income – – -$5.57M
Net income – – -$69.16M
Free cash flow – – -$41.21M
EPS (diluted) – – $-1.18
Cash & equivalents $1.06M $939.29 $78.95M
Total debt $79.55M $912.75K $203.02M
Shares (diluted) 19.60M 25.09M 59.04M
Enterprise value -$1.93M $67.74M $109.74M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBGICFBMHLFOSL
P/E -2.1x 32.6x -5.7x
P/FCF -3.3x -16,285x -9.6x
P/Operating cash flow – – -10.4x
P/S 0.0x 9,835x 0.4x
P/B -0.3x 7,095x 4.4x
P/Tangible book -0.3x 7,095x 15.3x
EV/EBITDA – – 88.7x
EV/EBIT – – -93.2x
EV/Revenue – – 0.5x
EV/FCF – – -12.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – – -13.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – -1.23

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBGICFBMHLFOSL
Revenue growth (1Y) – – -9.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -14.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – -6.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -10.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 85.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 51.5%
Net income growth (1Y) – – -9.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 0.7%
EPS growth (1Y) – – -6.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 4.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 12.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -10.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 13.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 0.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBGICFBMHLFOSL
Gross margin – – 56.7%
EBITDA margin – – 0.6%
Operating margin – – -0.6%
Pretax margin – – -4.2%
Net margin – – -7.1%
FCF margin – – -4.2%
Operating cash flow margin – – -3.8%
Return on equity – – -79.9%
Return on assets – – -10.6%
Return on invested capital – – -2.0%
Return on capital employed – – -1.4%
Asset turnover – – 1.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBGICFBMHLFOSL
Debt / assets 51.4% 7,223% 31.1%
Debt / equity -5.2x 82.8x 2.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 21.2x
Debt / FCF – – -4.9x
Liabilities / assets 110.0% 12.7% 86.2%
Equity / assets -10.0% 87.3% 13.8%
Interest coverage – – -0.2x
Current ratio 0.9x – 1.8x
Quick ratio 0.1x – 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.0x – 0.3x
Altman Z-score – – 1.88

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBGICFBMHLFOSL
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBGICFBMHLFOSL
EPS, next fiscal year – – $-0.04FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $993.58MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – -0.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – -7.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBGICFBMHLFOSL
Held by institutions – – 65.2%
Institutions holding – – 114
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +15.8%
Institutions buying – – 75
Institutions selling – – 24
Buyers to sellers – – 3.13

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BGICFBMHLFOSL
BGICF 1.00 -0.02 -0.01
BMHL -0.02 1.00 0.10
FOSL -0.01 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BGICF, BMHL and FOSL?

Fossil (FOSL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Birks (BGICF) $3.53M, Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) $78.25M, Fossil (FOSL) $445.13M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fossil (FOSL) returned the most: Birks (BGICF) -77.0%, Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) -8.5%, Fossil (FOSL) +224.8%. Over five years, Fossil (FOSL) compounded fastest (Birks (BGICF) -39.5%/yr, Fossil (FOSL) -13.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) has been the steadiest (Birks (BGICF) 141.9%, Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) 64.9%, Fossil (FOSL) 73.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BGICF, BMHL and FOSL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fossil (FOSL) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.