BG vs COOT vs ANDE Stock Comparison

Bunge Global, Australian Oilseeds Holdings and Andersons Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BG Bunge Global SA
$101.36 -7.0% 1M +5.1% 1Y
Market cap
$19.47B
P/E
19.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$91.82B
Div. yield
2.80%
Agricultural Products Consumer Staples
5 wins
ANDE Andersons, Inc.
$64.00 -4.4% 1M +36.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.17B
P/E
12.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.94B
Div. yield
1.25%
Agricultural Products Consumer Staples
7 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Andersons leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Andersons 7, Bunge Global 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBGCOOTANDELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $19.47B $10.04M $2.17B BG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.5x — 12.3x ANDE
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.3x — 12.3x BG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +80.5% — -5.2% BG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.1% — 1.6% ANDE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.3% — 7.4% ANDE
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.7x — 2.4x ANDE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.80% — 1.25% BG
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +5.1% -78.9% +36.8% ANDE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.8%/yr -48.8%/yr +13.6%/yr ANDE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.3% 91.8% 35.3% BG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 — 58/100 ANDE

Percentile Scorecard

BGCOOTANDE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBGCOOTANDE
Valuation 42 #20 of 34 – 70 #11 of 34
Growth 80 #7 of 31 – 53 #15 of 31
Profitability 43 #17 of 29 – 64 #11 of 29
Financial Health 26 #27 of 36 6 #34 of 36 46 #20 of 36
Shareholder Returns 75 #7 of 25 – 58 #11 of 25
Overall 53 – 58
  • BG ranked among 38 companies in Agribusiness
  • COOT ranked among 38 companies in Agribusiness
  • ANDE ranked among 38 companies in Agribusiness

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBGCOOTANDESPY
1 month -7.0%-25.0%-4.4% -0.2%
3 months -13.7%-2.7%-12.6% +3.9%
6 months -19.8%-41.9%-16.4% +8.2%
Year to date +13.8%-30.1%+20.4% +12.9%
1 year +5.1%-78.9%+36.8% +12.3%
3 years -3.9%-96.9%+29.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year -1.3%-68.5%+9.1% +23.3%
5 years +9.1%-96.5%+89.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +1.8%-48.8%+13.6% +10.9%
10 years +65.4%—+69.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year +5.2%—+5.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBGCOOTANDESPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.3%91.8%35.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.2%95.8%37.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.150.63-0.11 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.17-0.861.04 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -45.5%-97.0%-49.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -22.9%-79.5%-20.9% -1.2%
52-week high $131.41$1.76$80.87 $779.14
52-week low $88.55$0.36$46.31 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBGCOOTANDE
P/E now vs peer median 19.5xmedian 14.8x —median 14.8x 12.3xmedian 14.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 0.5x —median 0.5x 0.2xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.2xmedian 9.1x —median 9.1x 8.6xmedian 9.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -27.4xmedian 15.0x —median 15.0x 38.2xmedian 15.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.1x 3.4xmedian 1.1x 1.6xmedian 1.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.28 —median 1.28 0.45median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBGCOOTANDE
Revenue $91.82B – $10.94B
Gross profit $4.52B – $786.68M
Operating income $2.07B – –
Net income $1.06B – $186.91M
Free cash flow -$711.00M – $56.91M
EPS (diluted) $5.16 – $5.17
Cash & equivalents $593.00M $756.64K $66.55M
Total debt $21.00B $38.38M $900.77M
Shares (diluted) 195.34M 23.64M 34.27M
Enterprise value $16.98B $6.45M $1.89B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBGCOOTANDE
P/E 19.5x – 12.3x
P/FCF -27.4x – 38.2x
P/Operating cash flow 18.1x – 6.8x
P/S 0.2x – 0.2x
P/B 1.1x 3.4x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 8.1x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 13.2x – 8.6x
EV/EBIT 19.3x – 14.0x
EV/Revenue 0.4x – 0.3x
EV/FCF -56.1x – 52.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 37.1x – 9.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 0.45

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBGCOOTANDE
Revenue growth (1Y) 80.5% – -5.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -13.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 41.8% – 12.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 3.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 37.7% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -26.4% – 46.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 23.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -49.3% – 120.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 27.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 5.1% – 49.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -35.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -32.6% – 112.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -62.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBGCOOTANDE
Gross margin 4.9% – 7.2%
EBITDA margin 3.3% – 3.2%
Operating margin 2.3% – –
Pretax margin 1.5% – 2.0%
Net margin 1.1% – 1.6%
FCF margin -0.8% – 0.5%
Operating cash flow margin 1.2% – 2.9%
Return on equity 6.0% – 13.5%
Return on assets 2.2% – 4.9%
Return on invested capital 4.3% – 7.4%
Return on capital employed 6.8% – 9.3%
Asset turnover 1.9x – 3.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x – 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBGCOOTANDE
Debt / assets 44.9% 52.9% 25.9%
Debt / equity 1.2x 3.9x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.7x – 2.4x
Debt / FCF -29.5x – 15.8x
Liabilities / assets 62.9% 86.3% 60.9%
Equity / assets 37.1% 13.7% 39.1%
Interest coverage 2.6x – –
Current ratio 1.6x 0.6x 1.5x
Quick ratio 0.3x 0.3x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 3.15 – 4.66

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBGCOOTANDE
Dividend yield 2.8% – 1.2%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 2.8% – 1.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 51.9% – 14.5%
Payout ratio (FCF) -77.2% – 47.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) 47.6% – 1.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 2.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBGCOOTANDE
Forward P/E 10.3xFY2026 – 12.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $9.88FY2026 – $5.22FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +30.5%FY2026 – +87.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.0% – +25.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $88.99BFY2026 – $12.22BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +26.5%FY2026 – +11.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.3% – +1.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBGCOOTANDE
Held by institutions 94.8% – 89.3%
Institutions holding 744 – 301
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.1% – +0.1%
Institutions buying 416 – 157
Institutions selling 241 – 93
Buyers to sellers 1.73 – 1.69

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BGCOOTANDE
BG 1.00 0.01 0.52
COOT 0.01 1.00 -0.01
ANDE 0.52 -0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BG, COOT and ANDE?

Bunge Global (BG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bunge Global (BG) $19.47B, Australian Oilseeds Holdings (COOT) $10.04M, Andersons (ANDE) $2.17B.

Which stock is cheaper, BG, COOT and ANDE?

Andersons (ANDE) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bunge Global (BG) 19.5x, Andersons (ANDE) 12.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bunge Global (BG) is cheapest (Bunge Global (BG) 10.3x, Andersons (ANDE) 12.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bunge Global (BG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bunge Global (BG) +80.5%, Andersons (ANDE) -5.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Andersons (ANDE) has the highest net margin (Bunge Global (BG) 1.1%, Andersons (ANDE) 1.6%). On return on invested capital, Andersons (ANDE) leads (Bunge Global (BG) 4.3%, Andersons (ANDE) 7.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Andersons (ANDE) returned the most: Bunge Global (BG) +5.1%, Australian Oilseeds Holdings (COOT) -78.9%, Andersons (ANDE) +36.8%. Over five years, Andersons (ANDE) compounded fastest (Bunge Global (BG) +1.8%/yr, Australian Oilseeds Holdings (COOT) -48.8%/yr, Andersons (ANDE) +13.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Bunge Global (BG) has the highest dividend yield: Bunge Global (BG) 2.80%, Andersons (ANDE) 1.25%. Australian Oilseeds Holdings (COOT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bunge Global (BG) has been the steadiest (Bunge Global (BG) 29.3%, Australian Oilseeds Holdings (COOT) 91.8%, Andersons (ANDE) 35.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BG, COOT and ANDE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Andersons (ANDE) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.