BFAM vs MCTA vs PC Stock Comparison

Bright Horizons Family Solutions, Charming Medical and Premium Catering (Holdings) Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (PRDO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MCTA Charming Medical Ltd
$29.35 0.0% 1M +319.3% 1Y
Market cap
$445.47M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Personal Services Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

Bright Horizons Family Solutions leads on 1 of the 12 questions below (Bright Horizons Family Solutions 1, Charming Medical 1, Premium Catering (Holdings) 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBFAMMCTAPCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.67B $445.47M $274.48M BFAM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 21.0x -20,929x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.9x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.5% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.8% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.3% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.8x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -27.0% +319.3% 0.0% MCTA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.4%/yr — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.7% 73.8% 0.0% PC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

BFAMMCTAPC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBFAMMCTAPC
Valuation 31 #23 of 33 0 #33 of 33 –
Growth 52 #15 of 30 – –
Profitability 50 #15 of 29 – –
Financial Health 24 #30 of 39 87 #6 of 39 94 #4 of 51
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 14 – –
Overall 51 – –
  • BFAM ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • MCTA ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • PC ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBFAMMCTAPCSPY
1 month +11.8%0.0%0.0% -0.8%
3 months -5.4%0.0%0.0% +3.5%
6 months -9.4%0.0%0.0% +7.0%
Year to date -27.4%0.0%0.0% +12.2%
1 year -27.0%+319.3%0.0% +13.0%
3 years +2.0%—— +86.3%
3 years, per year +0.7%—— +23.1%
5 years -54.0%—— +68.6%
5 years, per year -14.4%—— +11.0%
10 years +9.9%—— +258.0%
10 years, per year +1.0%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBFAMMCTAPCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.7%73.8%0.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 55.0%—— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.290.260.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.574.32— 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.2%-25.6%-87.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.6%0.0%0.0% -1.8%
52-week high $109.23$29.35$9.40 $779.14
52-week low $59.18$7.00$9.40 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBFAMMCTAPC
P/E now vs peer median 21.7xmedian 15.5x -20,929xmedian 15.5x —median 20.5x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.3x 92.7xmedian 1.3x —median 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 10.1x —median 10.1x —median 13.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.4xmedian 14.7x -286.4xmedian 14.7x —median 17.5x
P/B now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 2.0x 86.0xmedian 2.0x 28.0xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.49median 0.35 —median 0.35 —median 1.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBFAMMCTAPC
Revenue $3.03B – –
Gross profit $711.35M – –
Operating income $311.11M – –
Net income $175.04M – –
Free cash flow $235.93M – –
EPS (diluted) $3.38 – –
Cash & equivalents $163.69M $4.70M $971.86K
Total debt $1.29B – –
Shares (diluted) 51.76M 16.15M 29.20M
Enterprise value $3.12B $439.45M $270.03M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBFAMMCTAPC
P/E 21.7x -20,929x –
P/FCF 15.4x -286.4x –
P/Operating cash flow 10.9x – –
P/S 1.2x 92.7x –
P/B 3.8x 86.0x 28.0x
P/Tangible book 4.8x 86.0x 28.0x
EV/EBITDA 11.7x – –
EV/EBIT 15.3x – –
EV/Revenue 1.6x – –
EV/FCF 20.1x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 14.3x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.49 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBFAMMCTAPC
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.5% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.8% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.7% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 12.6% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 8.8% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 26.2% – –
Net income growth (1Y) -1.0% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 39.1% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 10.4% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 44.4% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 0.3% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 11.1% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -2.8% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.2% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBFAMMCTAPC
Gross margin 23.5% – –
EBITDA margin 13.5% – –
Operating margin 10.3% – –
Pretax margin 8.6% – –
Net margin 5.8% – –
FCF margin 7.8% – –
Operating cash flow margin 11.0% – –
Return on equity 16.8% – –
Return on assets 4.6% – –
Return on invested capital 9.3% – –
Return on capital employed 11.0% – –
Asset turnover 0.8x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x – –
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBFAMMCTAPC
Debt / assets 34.0% 1.9% –
Debt / equity 1.4x 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.8x – –
Debt / FCF 5.5x – –
Liabilities / assets 75.1% 47.5% 13.7%
Equity / assets 24.9% 52.5% 86.3%
Interest coverage 6.2x – –
Current ratio 0.5x 1.9x 9.6x
Quick ratio 0.4x 1.4x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.2x 1.4x 0.9x
Altman Z-score 2.04 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBFAMMCTAPC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 17.5% – –
Shareholder yield 17.5% – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBFAMMCTAPC
Forward P/E 13.9xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $5.31FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY +16.7%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +13.6% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.03BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +3.3%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +2.5% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBFAMMCTAPC
Held by institutions 100.0% – –
Institutions holding 384 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.2% – –
Institutions buying 205 – –
Institutions selling 150 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.37 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BFAMMCTAPC
BFAM 1.00 -0.13 –
MCTA -0.13 1.00 –
PC – – –

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BFAM, MCTA and PC?

Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) $3.67B, Charming Medical (MCTA) $445.47M, Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) $274.48M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Charming Medical (MCTA) returned the most: Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) -27.0%, Charming Medical (MCTA) +319.3%, Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) 0.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) has been the steadiest (Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) 47.7%, Charming Medical (MCTA) 73.8%, Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) 0.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BFAM, MCTA and PC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) leads on 1. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.