BFAM vs LFS vs GOTU Stock Comparison

Bright Horizons Family Solutions, Leifras and Gaotu Techedu Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LFS LEIFRAS Co., Ltd.
$2.11 -1.4% 1M -28.5% 1Y
Market cap
$53.76M
P/E
17.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$78.98M
Div. yield
–
Education Services Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
GOTU Gaotu Techedu Inc.
$2.62 +6.5% 1M -16.0% 1Y
Market cap
$418.40M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$953.86M
Div. yield
–
Education Services Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Leifras leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Leifras 4, Gaotu Techedu 4, Bright Horizons Family Solutions 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBFAMLFSGOTULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.65B $53.76M $418.40M BFAM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 20.8x 17.7x -8.8x LFS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.9x — 262.0x BFAM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.5% +6.9% +25.2% GOTU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.8% 3.8% -5.0% BFAM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.3% 22.6% -26.7% LFS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.8x -2.9x — LFS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -27.0% -28.5% -16.0% GOTU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.4%/yr — -2.7%/yr GOTU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.7% 248.6% 46.5% GOTU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 55/100 43/100 LFS

Percentile Scorecard

BFAMLFSGOTU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBFAMLFSGOTU
Valuation 31 #23 of 33 63 #13 of 33 50 #17 of 33
Growth 52 #15 of 30 38 #19 of 30 66 #11 of 30
Profitability 50 #15 of 29 39 #18 of 29 21 #23 of 29
Financial Health 24 #30 of 39 79 #9 of 39 37 #25 of 39
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 14 – –
Overall 51 55 43
  • BFAM ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • LFS ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • GOTU ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBFAMLFSGOTUSPY
1 month +11.8%-1.4%+6.5% -0.8%
3 months -5.4%-1.4%+65.8% +3.5%
6 months -9.4%+6.0%+38.6% +7.0%
Year to date -27.4%-23.8%+12.9% +12.2%
1 year -27.0%-28.5%-16.0% +13.0%
3 years +2.0%—+8.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +0.7%—+2.7% +23.1%
5 years -54.0%—-12.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year -14.4%—-2.7% +11.0%
10 years +9.9%—— +258.0%
10 years, per year +1.0%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBFAMLFSGOTUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.7%248.6%46.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 55.0%138.7%44.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.291.350.73 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.57-0.11-0.34 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.2%-83.7%-83.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.6%-81.4%-15.2% -1.8%
52-week high $109.23$11.37$3.09 $779.14
52-week low $59.18$1.68$1.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBFAMLFSGOTU
P/E now vs peer median 21.7xmedian 15.5x 17.5xmedian 15.5x -9.0xmedian 15.5x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.3x 0.7xmedian 1.3x 0.4xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 10.1x 7.9xmedian 10.1x —median 10.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.4xmedian 14.7x 21.6xmedian 14.7x —median 14.7x
P/B now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 2.0x 4.7xmedian 2.0x 2.7xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median 0.49median 0.35 —median 0.35 0.15median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBFAMLFSGOTU
Revenue $3.03B $78.98M $953.86M
Gross profit $711.35M $24.53M $644.24M
Operating income $311.11M $4.30M -$62.97M
Net income $175.04M $3.04M -$47.72M
Free cash flow $235.93M $2.56M –
R&D – – $92.39M
EPS (diluted) $3.38 $0.12 $-0.29
Cash & equivalents $163.69M $15.94M $128.60M
Total debt $1.29B $10.41M $165.08M
Shares (diluted) 51.76M 25.19M 163.12M
Enterprise value $3.09B -$10.39M -$1.29B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBFAMLFSGOTU
P/E 21.7x 17.5x -9.0x
P/FCF 15.4x 21.6x –
P/Operating cash flow 10.9x 21.2x –
P/S 1.2x 0.7x 0.4x
P/B 3.8x 4.7x 2.7x
P/Tangible book 4.8x 4.7x 2.9x
EV/EBITDA 11.7x 7.9x –
EV/EBIT 15.3x 9.4x -0.2x
EV/Revenue 1.6x 0.5x 0.0x
EV/FCF 20.1x 15.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow 14.3x 15.5x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.49 – 0.15

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBFAMLFSGOTU
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.5% 6.9% 25.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.8% – 36.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.7% 16.8% 25.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 12.6% – 31.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 8.8% 18.1% 47.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 26.2% – -113.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -1.0% 7.5% 51.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 39.1% – -70.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 10.4% 13.2% 49.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 44.4% – -58.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 0.3% -48.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 11.1% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -2.8% -43.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.2% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBFAMLFSGOTU
Gross margin 23.5% 31.1% 67.5%
EBITDA margin 13.5% 6.5% –
Operating margin 10.3% 5.4% -6.6%
Pretax margin 8.6% 5.6% -5.3%
Net margin 5.8% 3.8% -5.0%
FCF margin 7.8% 3.2% –
Operating cash flow margin 11.0% 3.3% –
Return on equity 16.8% 25.6% -31.0%
Return on assets 4.6% 10.3% -6.0%
Return on invested capital 9.3% 22.6% -26.7%
Return on capital employed 11.0% 26.8% -31.4%
Asset turnover 0.8x 2.6x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 0.9x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% – 0.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBFAMLFSGOTU
Debt / assets 34.0% 3.7% 8.5%
Debt / equity 1.4x 0.1x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.8x -2.9x –
Debt / FCF 5.5x 0.4x –
Liabilities / assets 75.1% 61.0% 83.4%
Equity / assets 24.9% 39.0% 16.6%
Interest coverage 6.2x 52.8x –
Current ratio 0.5x 1.5x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.4x 1.4x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.2x 1.1x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 2.04 5.37 -0.39

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBFAMLFSGOTU
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 17.5% – –
Shareholder yield 17.5% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBFAMLFSGOTU
Forward P/E 13.9xFY2026 – 262.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.31FY2026 – $0.01FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +16.7%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +13.6% – +1,100.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.03BFY2026 – $1.11BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.3%FY2026 – +26.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.5% – +2.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBFAMLFSGOTU
Held by institutions 100.0% – 8.4%
Institutions holding 384 – 52
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.2% – -12.0%
Institutions buying 205 – 21
Institutions selling 150 – 20
Buyers to sellers 1.37 – 1.05

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BFAMLFSGOTU
BFAM 1.00 0.07 0.02
LFS 0.07 1.00 0.00
GOTU 0.02 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BFAM, LFS and GOTU?

Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) $3.65B, Leifras (LFS) $53.76M, Gaotu Techedu (GOTU) $418.40M.

Which stock is cheaper, BFAM, LFS and GOTU?

Leifras (LFS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) 20.8x, Leifras (LFS) 17.7x, Gaotu Techedu (GOTU) -8.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) is cheapest (Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) 13.9x, Gaotu Techedu (GOTU) 262.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Gaotu Techedu (GOTU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) +8.5%, Leifras (LFS) +6.9%, Gaotu Techedu (GOTU) +25.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) has the highest net margin (Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) 5.8%, Leifras (LFS) 3.8%, Gaotu Techedu (GOTU) -5.0%). On return on invested capital, Leifras (LFS) leads (Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) 9.3%, Leifras (LFS) 22.6%, Gaotu Techedu (GOTU) -26.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Gaotu Techedu (GOTU) returned the most: Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) -27.0%, Leifras (LFS) -28.5%, Gaotu Techedu (GOTU) -16.0%. Over five years, Gaotu Techedu (GOTU) compounded fastest (Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) -14.4%/yr, Gaotu Techedu (GOTU) -2.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Gaotu Techedu (GOTU) has been the steadiest (Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM) 47.7%, Leifras (LFS) 248.6%, Gaotu Techedu (GOTU) 46.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BFAM, LFS and GOTU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Leifras (LFS) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.