BEP-PA vs NEWH vs SLB Stock Comparison

Brookfield Renewable Partners, NewHydrogen and Slb Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (WAVE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
NEWH NewHydrogen, Inc.
$0.03 +50.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$24.62M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Hydrogen Energy
SLB Slb Limited/Nv
$52.34 +7.4% 1M +45.1% 1Y
Market cap
$77.26B
P/E
25.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$36.89B
Div. yield
2.22%
Oilfield Services Energy
8 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Slb leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Slb 8, Brookfield Renewable Partners 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBEP-PANEWHSLBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.98B $24.62M $77.26B SLB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -8.2x -6.3x 25.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 20.8x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -4.8% — +4.6% SLB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -14.9% — 8.4% SLB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.2% — 9.3% SLB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.7x — 1.2x SLB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 2.22% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -5.3% 0.0% +45.1% SLB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -8.4%/yr +8.5%/yr +9.7%/yr SLB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 18.5% 273.0% 36.6% BEP-PA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 17/100 58/100 SLB

Percentile Scorecard

BEP-PANEWHSLB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBEP-PANEWHSLB
Valuation 78 #6 of 24 20 #9 of 11 22 #37 of 47
Growth 55 #11 of 23 10 #10 of 11 49 #23 of 44
Profitability 46 #13 of 23 – 78 #10 of 41
Financial Health 22 #19 of 24 20 #9 of 11 56 #21 of 46
Shareholder Returns 32 #14 of 20 – 84 #6 of 32
Overall 46 17 58
  • BEP-PA ranked among 24 companies in Power Generation
  • NEWH ranked among 11 companies in Renewable Fuels
  • SLB ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBEP-PANEWHSLBSPY
1 month +3.4%+50.0%+7.4% -2.3%
3 months +0.3%+200.0%+6.1% -0.7%
6 months -7.2%0.0%-5.9% +4.8%
Year to date -6.3%+50.0%+36.4% +10.3%
1 year -5.3%0.0%+45.1% +10.3%
3 years +0.2%+200.0%-8.0% +73.0%
3 years, per year +0.1%+44.3%-2.7% +20.1%
5 years -35.6%+50.0%+58.7% +61.9%
5 years, per year -8.4%+8.5%+9.7% +10.1%
10 years —-66.7%-32.7% +258.6%
10 years, per year —-10.4%-3.9% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBEP-PANEWHSLBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 18.5%273.0%36.6% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.9%911.1%33.5% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.240.100.73 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.290.001.23 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.3%-83.3%-48.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -9.5%-25.0%-12.9% -3.5%
52-week high $18.89$0.04$60.12 $779.14
52-week low $16.15$0.01$35.19 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBEP-PANEWHSLB
P/E now vs peer median -8.2xmedian 23.9x -6.3xmedian 10.6x 25.0xmedian 24.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 2.6x —median 1.2x 2.1xmedian 1.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.1xmedian 11.6x -6.3xmedian 14.5x 11.6xmedian 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 12.2x -9.7xmedian 14.0x 16.9xmedian 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 2.1x -7.6xmedian 1.2x 2.8xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.60 -0.38median 0.19 -2.40median 0.49

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBEP-PANEWHSLB
Revenue $6.54B – $36.89B
Gross profit $3.53B – $6.02B
Operating income $267.00M -$3.88M $4.64B
Net income -$1.21B -$3.88M $3.16B
Free cash flow $2.56B -$2.54M $4.56B
R&D – $1.30M $678.00M
EPS (diluted) – $0.00 $2.07
Cash & equivalents $1.97B $301.51K $2.62B
Total debt $32.05B – $12.80B
Shares (diluted) – 819.51M 1.50B
Enterprise value $8.22B $21.43M $74.87B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBEP-PANEWHSLB
P/E -8.2x -6.3x 25.0x
P/FCF 3.1x -9.7x 16.9x
P/Operating cash flow 5.3x -9.7x 12.1x
P/S 1.2x – 2.1x
P/B 2.1x -7.6x 2.8x
P/Tangible book 2.1x -7.5x 3.5x
EV/EBITDA 14.1x -6.3x 11.6x
EV/EBIT 123.5x -6.3x 18.6x
EV/Revenue 5.0x – 2.3x
EV/FCF 12.9x -9.6x 19.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 21.7x -9.6x 13.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.38 -2.40

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBEP-PANEWHSLB
Revenue growth (1Y) -4.8% – 4.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 33.1% – 4.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -40.3% – -10.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 22.7% – -1.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 22.5% -89.6% -10.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 189.5% 12.2% -4.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -234.3% -89.7% -16.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -15.3% 12.2% -9.2%
EPS growth (1Y) – -66.6% -15.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 16.5% -10.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.2% -41.4% 8.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.3% -23.4% 6.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 52.9% -41.4% 11.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 23.9% -23.4% 18.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBEP-PANEWHSLB
Gross margin 53.9% – 16.3%
EBITDA margin 35.9% – 20.2%
Operating margin 4.1% – 12.6%
Pretax margin 6.2% – 10.7%
Net margin -14.9% – 8.4%
FCF margin 39.2% – 12.4%
Operating cash flow margin 23.2% – 17.2%
Return on equity -26.5% – 11.6%
Return on assets -1.0% -657.0% 5.6%
Return on invested capital 1.2% – 9.3%
Return on capital employed 0.3% -945.4% 11.3%
Asset turnover 0.1x – 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.3x 0.7x 2.0x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBEP-PANEWHSLB
Debt / assets 33.1% – 22.8%
Debt / equity 8.6x – 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.7x – 1.2x
Debt / FCF 12.5x – 2.8x
Liabilities / assets 96.1% 976.5% 51.6%
Equity / assets 3.9% -876.5% 48.4%
Interest coverage 1.8x – 9.2x
Current ratio 0.8x 2.0x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.7x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.5x 1.7x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – – 3.12

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBEP-PANEWHSLB
Dividend yield 0.0% – 2.2%
Net buyback yield – -3.2% 1.8%
Shareholder yield 0.0% -3.2% 4.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) -91.5% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 43.1% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 7.6% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.3% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBEP-PANEWHSLB
Forward P/E – – 20.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-1.42FY2026 – $2.52FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -14.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +17.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.26BFY2026 – $38.38BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.3%FY2026 – +7.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.7% – +0.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBEP-PANEWHSLB
Held by institutions – – 89.8%
Institutions holding – – 1,701
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +1.6%
Institutions buying – – 785
Institutions selling – – 664
Buyers to sellers – – 1.18

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BEP-PANEWHSLB
BEP-PA 1.00 0.04 0.01
NEWH 0.04 1.00 0.03
SLB 0.01 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BEP-PA, NEWH and SLB?

Slb (SLB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) $7.98B, NewHydrogen (NEWH) $24.62M, Slb (SLB) $77.26B.

Which company is growing faster?

Slb (SLB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) -4.8%, Slb (SLB) +4.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Slb (SLB) has the highest net margin (Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) -14.9%, Slb (SLB) 8.4%). On return on invested capital, Slb (SLB) leads (Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) 1.2%, Slb (SLB) 9.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Slb (SLB) returned the most: Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) -5.3%, NewHydrogen (NEWH) 0.0%, Slb (SLB) +45.1%. Over five years, Slb (SLB) compounded fastest (Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) -8.4%/yr, NewHydrogen (NEWH) +8.5%/yr, Slb (SLB) +9.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) 0.00%, Slb (SLB) 2.22%. Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) and NewHydrogen (NEWH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) has been the steadiest (Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) 18.5%, NewHydrogen (NEWH) 273.0%, Slb (SLB) 36.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BEP-PA, NEWH and SLB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Slb (SLB) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.