BEP-PA vs KMI vs NEWH Stock Comparison

Brookfield Renewable Partners, Kinder Morgan and NewHydrogen Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc.
$33.97 +11.5% 1M +31.2% 1Y
Market cap
$73.68B
P/E
20.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.34B
Div. yield
0.04%
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
8 wins
NEWH NewHydrogen, Inc.
$0.03 +50.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$20.49M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Hydrogen Energy

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Kinder Morgan leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Kinder Morgan 8, Brookfield Renewable Partners 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBEP-PAKMINEWHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.00B $73.68B $20.49M KMI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -8.2x 20.4x -5.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 20.1x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.6% +11.7% — KMI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -14.5% 19.6% — KMI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.9% 6.3% — KMI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 8.5x 4.1x — KMI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.14% 0.04% 0.00% BEP-PA
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -9.2% +31.2% 0.0% KMI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -8.7%/yr +15.2%/yr +8.5%/yr KMI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 18.5% 21.2% 275.5% BEP-PA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 36/100 42/100 17/100 KMI

Percentile Scorecard

BEP-PAKMINEWH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBEP-PAKMINEWH
Valuation 57 #11 of 24 29 #25 of 35 20 #9 of 11
Growth 14 #20 of 23 58 #15 of 34 10 #10 of 11
Profitability 59 #10 of 23 53 #15 of 31 –
Financial Health 22 #19 of 24 47 #18 of 33 20 #9 of 11
Shareholder Returns 28 #14 of 19 23 #24 of 31 –
Overall 36 42 17
  • BEP-PA ranked among 24 companies in Power Generation
  • KMI ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • NEWH ranked among 11 companies in Renewable Fuels

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBEP-PAKMINEWHSPY
1 month +3.8%+11.5%+50.0% +0.7%
3 months -1.1%+7.3%+50.0% +3.7%
6 months -8.8%+3.3%0.0% +7.1%
Year to date -7.9%+23.6%+50.0% +12.8%
1 year -9.2%+31.2%0.0% +11.9%
3 years +8.7%+110.6%+200.0% +85.2%
3 years, per year +2.8%+28.2%+44.3% +22.8%
5 years -36.5%+102.8%+50.0% +67.6%
5 years, per year -8.7%+15.2%+8.5% +10.9%
10 years —+66.3%-62.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year —+5.2%-9.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBEP-PAKMINEWHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 18.5%21.2%275.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 21.1%20.6%882.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.26-0.22-0.16 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.501.470.00 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.3%-20.4%-83.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.0%-1.4%-25.0% -1.2%
52-week high $18.89$34.44$0.04 $779.14
52-week low $16.15$25.84$0.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBEP-PAKMINEWH
P/E now vs peer median -8.3xmedian 24.9x 21.0xmedian 19.6x -6.3xmedian 10.7x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 2.6x 4.1xmedian 2.8x —median 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.1xmedian 11.6x 13.8xmedian 11.1x -6.3xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -6.0xmedian 13.9x 24.6xmedian 16.9x -9.7xmedian 14.4x
P/B now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 2.1x 2.3xmedian 2.4x -7.6xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.62 1.55median 1.68 -0.38median 0.19

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBEP-PAKMINEWH
Revenue $6.54B $18.34B –
Gross profit $3.53B $12.18B –
Operating income $267.00M $5.31B -$3.88M
Net income -$1.21B $3.71B -$3.88M
Free cash flow $2.56B $3.08B -$2.54M
R&D – – $1.30M
EPS (diluted) – $1.62 $0.00
Cash & equivalents $1.97B $918.00M $301.51K
Total debt $32.05B $33.07B –
Shares (diluted) – 2.23B 819.51M
Enterprise value -$17.16B $72.54B $17.30M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBEP-PAKMINEWH
P/E -8.3x 21.0x -6.3x
P/FCF -6.0x 24.6x -9.7x
P/Operating cash flow 5.2x 11.2x -9.7x
P/S 1.2x 4.1x –
P/B 2.1x 2.3x -7.6x
P/Tangible book 2.1x 2.4x -7.5x
EV/EBITDA 11.1x 13.8x -6.3x
EV/EBIT 28.2x 20.3x -6.3x
EV/Revenue 5.0x 5.9x –
EV/FCF -25.1x 35.0x -9.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 21.6x 16.0x -9.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.55 -0.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBEP-PAKMINEWH
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.6% 11.7% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.3% 4.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 2.8% 9.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.8% 5.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -9.9% 18.9% -89.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -8.5% 7.6% 12.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -386.7% 30.8% -89.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -76.2% 13.1% 12.2%
EPS growth (1Y) – 31.9% -66.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 13.5% 16.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.2% 17.4% -41.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.3% 6.5% -23.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -7.7% 11.8% -41.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -40.0% -3.3% -23.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBEP-PAKMINEWH
Gross margin 53.9% 66.4% –
EBITDA margin 45.1% 42.6% –
Operating margin 17.8% 29.0% –
Pretax margin 47.9% 25.8% –
Net margin -14.5% 19.6% –
FCF margin -20.0% 16.8% –
Operating cash flow margin 23.2% 36.7% –
Return on equity 14.3% 11.3% –
Return on assets 0.5% 5.0% -657.0%
Return on invested capital 4.9% 6.3% –
Return on capital employed 1.4% 7.6% -945.4%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.4x 1.8x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBEP-PAKMINEWH
Debt / assets 33.1% 43.9% –
Debt / equity 8.6x 1.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA 8.5x 4.1x –
Debt / FCF -24.5x 10.7x –
Liabilities / assets 96.1% 56.5% 976.5%
Equity / assets 3.9% 43.5% -876.5%
Interest coverage 1.0x – –
Current ratio 0.8x 0.7x 2.0x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.2x 1.7x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.2x 1.7x
Altman Z-score – 1.34 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBEP-PAKMINEWH
Dividend yield 0.0% 3.5% –
Net buyback yield – – -3.2%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 3.5% -3.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) -102.4% 71.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) -84.3% 85.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 7.6% 1.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.3% 1.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBEP-PAKMINEWH
Forward P/E – 20.1xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-1.42FY2026 $1.63FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – +25.4%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – -11.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.26BFY2026 $17.89BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +13.3%FY2026 +5.6%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -2.7% +0.4% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBEP-PAKMINEWH
Held by institutions – 69.3% –
Institutions holding – 1,813 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – +3.3% –
Institutions buying – 899 –
Institutions selling – 648 –
Buyers to sellers – 1.39 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BEP-PAKMINEWH
BEP-PA 1.00 -0.01 0.04
KMI -0.01 1.00 -0.04
NEWH 0.04 -0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BEP-PA, KMI and NEWH?

Kinder Morgan (KMI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) $8.00B, Kinder Morgan (KMI) $73.68B, NewHydrogen (NEWH) $20.49M.

Which company is growing faster?

Kinder Morgan (KMI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) +7.6%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) +11.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kinder Morgan (KMI) has the highest net margin (Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) -14.5%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) 19.6%). On return on invested capital, Kinder Morgan (KMI) leads (Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) 4.9%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) 6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kinder Morgan (KMI) returned the most: Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) -9.2%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) +31.2%, NewHydrogen (NEWH) 0.0%. Over five years, Kinder Morgan (KMI) compounded fastest (Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) -8.7%/yr, Kinder Morgan (KMI) +15.2%/yr, NewHydrogen (NEWH) +8.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) has the highest dividend yield: Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) 0.14%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) 0.04%, NewHydrogen (NEWH) 0.00%. NewHydrogen (NEWH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) has been the steadiest (Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) 18.5%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) 21.2%, NewHydrogen (NEWH) 275.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BEP-PA, KMI and NEWH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kinder Morgan (KMI) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.