BEKE vs COMP vs FTHM Stock Comparison

KE Holdings, Compass and Fathom Holdings Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (OPAD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BEKE KE Holdings Inc.
$17.07 +2.8% 1M -7.3% 1Y
Market cap
$19.47B
P/E
21.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.77B
Div. yield
–
Residential Brokerage Real Estate
6 wins
COMP Compass, Inc.
$9.76 +6.4% 1M +27.2% 1Y
Market cap
$7.33B
P/E
109.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.56B
Div. yield
–
Residential Brokerage Real Estate
4 wins
FTHM Fathom Holdings Inc.
$0.20 -62.3% 1M -87.5% 1Y
Market cap
$6.13M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$406.93M
Div. yield
–
Residential Brokerage Real Estate
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

KE Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (KE Holdings 6, Compass 4, Fathom Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBEKECOMPFTHMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $19.47B $7.33B $6.13M BEKE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 21.1x 109.7x -0.2x BEKE
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.3x 61.0x — BEKE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -10.9% +67.8% +4.3% COMP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.2% 0.6% -6.3% BEKE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.0% -42.0% COMP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 25.9x -1.5x FTHM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.3% +27.2% -87.5% COMP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -7.3%/yr -5.4%/yr -62.1%/yr COMP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.9% 65.0% 120.1% BEKE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 35/100 16/100 BEKE

Percentile Scorecard

BEKECOMPFTHM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBEKECOMPFTHM
Valuation 29 #13 of 18 24 #14 of 18 35 #12 of 18
Growth 33 #11 of 16 80 #4 of 16 20 #13 of 16
Profitability 93 #2 of 16 27 #12 of 16 20 #13 of 16
Financial Health – 31 #12 of 17 6 #16 of 17
Shareholder Returns – 14 #7 of 8 0 #8 of 8
Overall 52 35 16
  • BEKE ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services
  • COMP ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services
  • FTHM ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBEKECOMPFTHMSPY
1 month +2.8%+6.4%-62.3% -1.0%
3 months +7.4%-11.9%-76.5% +2.9%
6 months +5.5%+24.3%-79.6% +6.4%
Year to date +8.3%-7.7%-80.2% +11.4%
1 year -7.3%+27.2%-87.5% +13.1%
3 years +8.6%+349.8%-93.7% +79.4%
3 years, per year +2.8%+65.1%-60.2% +21.5%
5 years -31.7%-24.3%-99.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year -7.3%-5.4%-62.1% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureBEKECOMPFTHMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.9%65.0%120.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 36.8%55.8%108.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.762.351.21 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.200.42-0.73 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.9%-86.3%-99.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.9%-28.1%-88.5% -2.5%
52-week high $19.59$13.58$1.74 $779.14
52-week low $14.26$6.68$0.18 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBEKECOMPFTHM
P/E now vs peer median 20.5xmedian 20.5x 110.8xmedian 20.5x -0.3xmedian 20.5x
P/S now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 0.7x 0.7xmedian 0.7x 0.0xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.9x 103.6xmedian 9.9x -2.0xmedian 9.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 33.5xmedian 12.3x 57.3xmedian 12.3x -0.5xmedian 12.3x
P/B now vs peer median —median 1.8x 2.5xmedian 1.8x 0.3xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 7.48median 0.50 4.03median 0.50 -0.01median 0.50

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBEKECOMPFTHM
Revenue $12.77B $10.56B $406.93M
Gross profit $3.07B – –
Operating income $694.87M -$276.10M -$20.72M
Net income $685.32M $66.90M -$25.50M
Free cash flow $1.15B $128.30M -$13.58M
R&D $345.62M $360.50M $7.90M
EPS (diluted) $0.80 $0.08 $-0.76
Cash & equivalents $1.09B $694.00M $4.50M
Total debt – $3.14B $25.06M
Shares (diluted) 1.16B 842.38M 33.42M
Enterprise value -$7.71B $5.78B -$12.95M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBEKECOMPFTHM
P/E 20.5x 110.8x -0.3x
P/FCF 33.5x 57.3x -0.5x
P/Operating cash flow 33.5x 47.5x -0.5x
P/S 3.0x 0.7x 0.0x
P/B – 2.5x 0.3x
P/Tangible book – 490.1x 0.8x
EV/EBITDA – 103.6x -2.0x
EV/EBIT 45.3x -35.5x -1.3x
EV/Revenue 2.5x 0.9x 0.1x
EV/FCF 27.4x 76.4x -2.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.4x 63.3x -2.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 7.48 4.03 -0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBEKECOMPFTHM
Revenue growth (1Y) -10.9% 67.8% 4.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.6% 27.8% 3.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -3.3% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.6% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 47.4% -368.0% 12.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -5.0% 17.8% 7.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 25.6% 223.2% -8.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -2.3% 28.7% 0.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 2.4% 186.5% 11.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.7% 27.5% 22.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 222.1% -5.6% -9.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -13.1% 42.5% -4.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 89.3% -12.4% -9.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -13.1% 37.8% -4.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBEKECOMPFTHM
Gross margin 24.0% – –
EBITDA margin – 0.9% -3.4%
Operating margin 5.4% -2.6% -5.1%
Pretax margin 7.9% -3.3% -6.3%
Net margin 7.2% 0.6% -6.3%
FCF margin 9.0% 1.2% -3.3%
Operating cash flow margin 9.0% 1.5% -3.3%
Return on equity – 2.3% -95.2%
Return on assets – 0.8% -35.0%
Return on invested capital – 0.0% -42.0%
Return on capital employed – -4.0% -74.2%
Asset turnover – 1.3x 5.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 2.3x 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.5% 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBEKECOMPFTHM
Debt / assets – 37.7% 34.1%
Debt / equity – 1.1x 1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 25.9x -1.5x
Debt / FCF – 24.5x -1.8x
Liabilities / assets – 64.2% 67.5%
Equity / assets – 35.8% 32.5%
Interest coverage – -3.4x –
Current ratio – 1.1x 0.8x
Quick ratio – 0.7x 0.3x
Cash ratio – 0.5x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – 1.55 2.09

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBEKECOMPFTHM
Dividend yield 1.6% – –
Net buyback yield – -0.4% -95.7%
Shareholder yield 1.6% -0.4% -95.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBEKECOMPFTHM
Forward P/E 14.3xFY2026 61.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.19FY2026 $0.16FY2026 $-0.14FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +7.2%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +10.9% +37.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $13.57BFY2026 $15.07BFY2026 $472.49MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.3%FY2026 +116.5%FY2026 +12.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -4.8% -1.9% +3.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBEKECOMPFTHM
Held by institutions 5.7% 93.4% 13.2%
Institutions holding 205 431 42
Change in shares held, QoQ -8.0% +7.4% +35.1%
Institutions buying 106 242 14
Institutions selling 64 119 11
Buyers to sellers 1.66 2.03 1.27

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BEKECOMPFTHM
BEKE 1.00 0.09 -0.01
COMP 0.09 1.00 0.18
FTHM -0.01 0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BEKE, COMP and FTHM?

KE Holdings (BEKE) is the largest by market capitalisation: KE Holdings (BEKE) $19.47B, Compass (COMP) $7.33B, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) $6.13M.

Which stock is cheaper, BEKE, COMP and FTHM?

KE Holdings (BEKE) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (KE Holdings (BEKE) 21.1x, Compass (COMP) 109.7x, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -0.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, KE Holdings (BEKE) is cheapest (KE Holdings (BEKE) 14.3x, Compass (COMP) 61.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Compass (COMP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: KE Holdings (BEKE) -10.9%, Compass (COMP) +67.8%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) +4.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

KE Holdings (BEKE) has the highest net margin (KE Holdings (BEKE) 7.2%, Compass (COMP) 0.6%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -6.3%). On return on invested capital, Compass (COMP) leads (Compass (COMP) 0.0%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -42.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Compass (COMP) returned the most: KE Holdings (BEKE) -7.3%, Compass (COMP) +27.2%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -87.5%. Over five years, Compass (COMP) compounded fastest (KE Holdings (BEKE) -7.3%/yr, Compass (COMP) -5.4%/yr, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -62.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, KE Holdings (BEKE) has been the steadiest (KE Holdings (BEKE) 36.9%, Compass (COMP) 65.0%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) 120.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BEKE, COMP and FTHM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, KE Holdings (BEKE) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.