BDN vs SLG vs UDR Stock Comparison

Brandywine Realty Trust, Sl Green Realty and Udr Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (KRC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BDN Brandywine Realty Trust
$3.03 +8.6% 1M -9.8% 1Y
Market cap
$550.43M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$502.51M
Div. yield
–
Office REITs Real Estate
3 wins
SLG Sl Green Realty Corp
$49.40 +1.2% 1M -2.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.80B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.04B
Div. yield
–
Office REITs Real Estate
1 win
UDR UDR, Inc.
$35.92 +7.9% 1M +6.3% 1Y
Market cap
$11.97B
P/E
17.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.71B
Div. yield
0.05%
Residential REITs Real Estate
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Udr leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Udr 5, Brandywine Realty Trust 3, Sl Green Realty 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBDNSLGUDRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $550.43M $3.80B $11.97B UDR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -3.9x -20.0x 17.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 34.2x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.5% +8.5% +0.6% SLG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -27.8% -18.4% 40.5% UDR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.3% — 10.1% BDN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.3x — 3.7x BDN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.05% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -9.8% -2.0% +6.3% UDR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -26.0%/yr -8.1%/yr -7.9%/yr UDR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.8% 38.3% 20.6% UDR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 21/100 57/100 BDN

Percentile Scorecard

BDNSLGUDR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBDNSLGUDR
Valuation 92 #12 of 146 11 #130 of 146 50 #73 of 146
Growth 14 #125 of 145 11 #129 of 145 53 #69 of 145
Profitability 31 #98 of 141 5 #134 of 141 96 #7 of 141
Financial Health 66 #50 of 146 37 #93 of 146 36 #94 of 146
Shareholder Returns 97 #5 of 136 44 #77 of 136 52 #66 of 136
Overall 60 21 57
  • BDN ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • SLG ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • UDR ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBDNSLGUDRSPY
1 month +8.6%+1.2%+7.9% -2.0%
3 months -4.7%-11.5%-6.8% -2.2%
6 months 0.0%+12.9%-2.8% +4.2%
Year to date +3.8%+7.7%-2.1% +10.6%
1 year -9.8%-2.0%+6.3% +10.4%
3 years -28.7%+43.6%+8.0% +73.6%
3 years, per year -10.7%+12.8%+2.6% +20.2%
5 years -77.8%-34.3%-33.7% +61.6%
5 years, per year -26.0%-8.1%-7.9% +10.1%
10 years -79.6%-50.6%+4.4% +261.3%
10 years, per year -14.7%-6.8%+0.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBDNSLGUDRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.8%38.3%20.6% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.8%38.7%20.0% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.590.910.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.27-0.050.31 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -83.2%-76.2%-48.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.2%-17.4%-12.9% -3.2%
52-week high $3.49$59.83$41.24 $779.14
52-week low $2.47$35.33$33.28 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBDNSLGUDR
P/E now vs peer median -3.7xmedian 26.1x -18.3xmedian 26.1x 16.7xmedian 26.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 4.1x 3.4xmedian 4.1x 6.7xmedian 4.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 14.4x —median 14.4x 11.1xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -29.1xmedian 21.6x -3.6xmedian 21.6x 173.1xmedian 21.6x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.3x 0.9xmedian 1.3x 3.7xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 1.95 -0.70median 1.95 1.04median 1.95

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBDNSLGUDR
Revenue $502.51M $1.04B $1.71B
Operating income $95.73M – $893.52M
Net income -$139.36M -$171.98M $745.72M
Free cash flow -$17.69M -$979.77M $66.65M
EPS (diluted) $-0.81 $-2.70 $2.14
Cash & equivalents $312.74M $180.79M $1.18M
Total debt $225.01M $4.31B $5.76B
Shares (diluted) 172.01M 70.67M 324.01M
Enterprise value $131.33M $3.14B $11.96B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBDNSLGUDR
P/E -3.7x -18.3x 16.7x
P/FCF -29.1x -3.6x 173.1x
P/Operating cash flow 4.6x 38.0x 13.5x
P/S 1.0x 3.4x 6.7x
P/B 0.8x 0.9x 3.7x
P/Tangible book 0.8x 1.2x 3.7x
EV/EBITDA 1.5x – 11.1x
EV/EBIT 4.5x – 19.4x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 7.3x 10.1x
EV/FCF -24.2x -7.8x 259.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 3.8x 82.8x 20.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 -0.70 1.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBDNSLGUDR
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.5% 8.5% 0.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.7% 0.5% 2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 356.5% – 161.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 3.3% – 12.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 25.3% -790.9% 366.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -141.6% 28.3% 15.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 24.7% -426.4% 388.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -137.8% 26.1% 16.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -22.2% -32.3% -3.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -13.2% -22.5% 0.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -162.1% -353.2% -88.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -38.4% -77.6% -42.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBDNSLGUDR
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 57.5% – 90.8%
Operating margin 19.0% – 52.2%
Pretax margin -27.7% – 43.6%
Net margin -27.8% -18.4% 40.5%
FCF margin -3.5% -94.4% 3.9%
Operating cash flow margin 22.5% 8.9% 49.9%
Return on equity -20.7% -4.0% 24.6%
Return on assets -4.1% -1.3% 7.3%
Return on invested capital 10.3% – 10.1%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.8x -0.5x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% – 1.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBDNSLGUDR
Debt / assets 6.9% 36.5% 55.9%
Debt / equity 0.3x 1.1x 1.8x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.3x – 3.7x
Debt / FCF -12.7x -4.4x 86.4x
Liabilities / assets 80.1% 66.8% 69.6%
Equity / assets 19.9% 33.2% 30.4%
Interest coverage – – 4.6x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBDNSLGUDR
Dividend yield 10.6% 4.3% 4.0%
Net buyback yield 3.3% 0.0% 3.4%
Shareholder yield 13.9% 4.3% 7.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 75.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 847.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – -0.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 2.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBDNSLGUDR
Forward P/E – – 34.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.81FY2026 $-0.75FY2026 $1.05FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -7.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – -41.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $512.58MFY2026 $640.65MFY2026 $1.77BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.0%FY2026 +6.5%FY2026 +4.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -15.9% +6.4% +0.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBDNSLGUDR
Held by institutions 73.2% 99.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 232 357 526
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.5% +0.0% +4.9%
Institutions buying 130 185 244
Institutions selling 68 119 207
Buyers to sellers 1.91 1.55 1.18

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BDNSLGUDR
BDN 1.00 0.58 0.42
SLG 0.58 1.00 0.44
UDR 0.42 0.44 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BDN, SLG and UDR?

Udr (UDR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) $550.43M, Sl Green Realty (SLG) $3.80B, Udr (UDR) $11.97B.

Which company is growing faster?

Sl Green Realty (SLG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) +3.5%, Sl Green Realty (SLG) +8.5%, Udr (UDR) +0.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Udr (UDR) has the highest net margin (Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) -27.8%, Sl Green Realty (SLG) -18.4%, Udr (UDR) 40.5%). On return on invested capital, Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) leads (Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) 10.3%, Udr (UDR) 10.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Udr (UDR) returned the most: Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) -9.8%, Sl Green Realty (SLG) -2.0%, Udr (UDR) +6.3%. Over five years, Udr (UDR) compounded fastest (Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) -26.0%/yr, Sl Green Realty (SLG) -8.1%/yr, Udr (UDR) -7.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) 0.00%, Sl Green Realty (SLG) 0.00%, Udr (UDR) 0.05%. Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) and Sl Green Realty (SLG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Udr (UDR) has been the steadiest (Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) 35.8%, Sl Green Realty (SLG) 38.3%, Udr (UDR) 20.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BDN, SLG and UDR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Udr (UDR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.