BCS vs ENVA vs HTT Stock Comparison

Barclays, Enova International and High Templar Tech Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MUFG) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BCS Barclays Plc
$22.91 -6.9% 1M +6.2% 1Y
Market cap
$81.44B
P/E
7.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$41.50B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
5 wins
ENVA Enova International, Inc.
$180.07 +5.9% 1M +51.0% 1Y
Market cap
$4.49B
P/E
11.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.65B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
4 wins
HTT High Templar Tech Ltd
$1.88 -21.0% 1M -60.3% 1Y
Market cap
$767.52M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Barclays leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Barclays 5, Enova International 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBCSENVAHTTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $81.44B $4.49B $767.52M BCS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7.6x 11.7x — BCS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.9x 10.9x — BCS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.5% +20.1% — ENVA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 26.0% 10.5% — BCS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 22.1% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.6x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +6.2% +51.0% -60.3% ENVA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.4%/yr +40.9%/yr +2.4%/yr ENVA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.0% 45.9% 56.9% BCS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 76/100 — ENVA

Percentile Scorecard

BCSENVAHTT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBCSENVAHTT
Valuation 99 #5 of 361 86 #24 of 169 –
Growth 66 #59 of 172 80 #33 of 162 –
Profitability 18 #123 of 149 91 #15 of 149 –
Financial Health 1 #157 of 158 66 #54 of 158 93 #12 of 158
Shareholder Returns 56 #151 of 338 56 #60 of 136 –
Overall 48 76 –
  • BCS ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • ENVA ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • HTT ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBCSENVAHTTSPY
1 month -6.9%+5.9%-21.0% +0.9%
3 months -12.1%-26.6%-21.0% +5.9%
6 months -0.4%+6.8%-20.7% +8.5%
Year to date -10.0%+14.5%-47.0% +13.3%
1 year +6.2%+51.0%-60.3% +12.4%
3 years +267.1%+352.1%+4.4% +88.1%
3 years, per year +54.3%+65.4%+1.5% +23.5%
5 years +104.7%+455.1%+12.6% +68.2%
5 years, per year +15.4%+40.9%+2.4% +11.0%
10 years +147.7%+1,805.5%— +263.4%
10 years, per year +9.5%+34.3%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureBCSENVAHTTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.0%45.9%56.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.8%51.6%59.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.611.201.15 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.201.11-1.06 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.0%-42.8%-64.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.8%-32.2%-62.0% -0.9%
52-week high $28.56$265.45$4.95 $779.14
52-week low $20.07$119.22$1.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBCSENVAHTT
P/E now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 12.1x 11.7xmedian 11.4x —median 11.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 3.4x 1.2xmedian 2.7x —median 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.1x 6.4xmedian 11.3x —median 11.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.8x 2.2xmedian 6.9x —median 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.2x 2.8xmedian 0.7x 0.5xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.42median 1.32 0.34median 0.34 —median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBCSENVAHTT
Revenue $41.50B $3.65B –
Gross profit – $2.21B –
Operating income – $878.11M –
Net income $10.83B $382.44M –
Free cash flow – $2.01B –
EPS (diluted) $2.95 $14.47 –
Cash & equivalents $335.17B $105.96M $561.74M
Total debt $302.10B $1.61B $879.65M
Shares (diluted) 3.65B 26.43M 500.73M
Enterprise value -$1.63T $4.10B -$2.27B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBCSENVAHTT
P/E 7.5x 11.7x –
P/FCF – 2.2x –
P/Operating cash flow – 2.2x –
P/S 1.9x 1.2x –
P/B 0.8x 2.8x 0.5x
P/Tangible book 0.8x 2.8x 0.5x
EV/EBITDA – 6.4x –
EV/EBIT 16.4x 6.8x –
EV/Revenue -1.5x 1.6x –
EV/FCF – 3.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 2.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.42 0.34 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBCSENVAHTT
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.5% 20.1% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.8% 21.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 27.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 22.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 24.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 26.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) 19.1% 30.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 10.5% 26.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) 29.0% 30.7% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 17.8% 34.1% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 17.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 22.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 17.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 23.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBCSENVAHTT
Gross margin – 60.6% –
EBITDA margin – 25.5% –
Operating margin – 24.0% –
Pretax margin 33.1% 13.5% –
Net margin 26.0% 10.5% –
FCF margin – 54.9% –
Operating cash flow margin – 56.2% –
Return on equity 10.4% 24.9% –
Return on assets 0.5% 5.1% –
Return on invested capital – 22.1% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.5x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 5.4x –
Stock comp / revenue – 1.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBCSENVAHTT
Debt / assets 13.1% 21.0% 16.0%
Debt / equity 2.9x 1.0x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.6x –
Debt / FCF – 0.8x –
Liabilities / assets 95.5% 79.6% 21.2%
Equity / assets 4.5% 20.4% 78.8%
Interest coverage – 2.3x –
Current ratio – – 4.8x
Quick ratio – – 2.4x
Cash ratio – – 2.4x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBCSENVAHTT
Dividend yield 2.7% – –
Net buyback yield – 3.0% –
Shareholder yield 2.7% 3.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBCSENVAHTT
Forward P/E 7.9xFY2026 10.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $2.91FY2026 $16.45FY2026 $-0.04FY2024
EPS growth, next FY +26.0%FY2026 +26.9%FY2026 -233.3%FY2024
EPS growth, the year after +12.7% +26.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $42.91BFY2026 $3.65BFY2026 $47.00MFY2024
Revenue growth, next FY +7.7%FY2026 +15.7%FY2026 +164.2%FY2024
Revenue growth, the year after -4.3% +34.0% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBCSENVAHTT
Held by institutions 8.5% 94.5% 2.2%
Institutions holding 556 425 42
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.9% +0.4% -26.1%
Institutions buying 306 239 14
Institutions selling 161 134 21
Buyers to sellers 1.90 1.78 0.67

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BCSENVAHTT
BCS 1.00 0.41 0.17
ENVA 0.41 1.00 0.08
HTT 0.17 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BCS, ENVA and HTT?

Barclays (BCS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Barclays (BCS) $81.44B, Enova International (ENVA) $4.49B, High Templar Tech (HTT) $767.52M.

Which stock is cheaper, BCS, ENVA and HTT?

Barclays (BCS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Barclays (BCS) 7.6x, Enova International (ENVA) 11.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Barclays (BCS) is cheapest (Barclays (BCS) 7.9x, Enova International (ENVA) 10.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Enova International (ENVA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Barclays (BCS) +9.5%, Enova International (ENVA) +20.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Barclays (BCS) has the highest net margin (Barclays (BCS) 26.0%, Enova International (ENVA) 10.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Enova International (ENVA) returned the most: Barclays (BCS) +6.2%, Enova International (ENVA) +51.0%, High Templar Tech (HTT) -60.3%. Over five years, Enova International (ENVA) compounded fastest (Barclays (BCS) +15.4%/yr, Enova International (ENVA) +40.9%/yr, High Templar Tech (HTT) +2.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Barclays (BCS) has been the steadiest (Barclays (BCS) 31.0%, Enova International (ENVA) 45.9%, High Templar Tech (HTT) 56.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BCS, ENVA and HTT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Barclays (BCS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.