BCE vs MANU vs CHT Stock Comparison

Bce, Manchester United and Chunghwa Telecom Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (T) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BCE Bce Inc
$20.03 -2.7% 1M -15.0% 1Y
Market cap
$18.68B
P/E
3.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.97B
Div. yield
8.16%
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
7 wins
MANU Manchester United plc
$20.78 +1.5% 1M +16.2% 1Y
Market cap
$3.62B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$909.31M
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
CHT Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd
$48.19 +4.8% 1M +11.0% 1Y
Market cap
$37.38B
P/E
27.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.90B
Div. yield
3.34%
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Bce leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Bce 7, Chunghwa Telecom 3, Manchester United 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBCEMANUCHTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $18.68B $3.62B $37.38B CHT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 3.7x -61.9x 27.9x BCE
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.1x — 28.2x BCE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.2% +5.5% +8.3% CHT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 22.7% -6.4% 17.0% BCE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 20.9% 2.6% 10.7% BCE
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 2.4x — BCE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 8.16% 0.00% 3.34% BCE
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -15.0% +16.2% +11.0% MANU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -17.2%/yr +5.0%/yr +4.1%/yr MANU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 22.0% 33.5% 13.9% CHT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 46/100 53/100 BCE

Percentile Scorecard

BCEMANUCHT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBCEMANUCHT
Valuation 71 #15 of 49 30 #31 of 44 25 #37 of 49
Growth 61 #18 of 45 76 #11 of 43 50 #23 of 45
Profitability 93 #4 of 45 51 #21 of 42 55 #21 of 45
Financial Health 44 #28 of 49 26 #35 of 47 94 #4 of 49
Shareholder Returns 78 #9 of 37 – 42 #22 of 37
Overall 69 46 53
  • BCE ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • MANU ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • CHT ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBCEMANUCHTSPY
1 month -2.7%+1.5%+4.8% +0.9%
3 months -10.3%-11.1%+11.7% +5.9%
6 months -13.9%+18.7%+12.1% +8.5%
Year to date -15.9%+30.5%+15.5% +13.3%
1 year -15.0%+16.2%+11.0% +12.4%
3 years -45.3%+17.5%+35.7% +88.1%
3 years, per year -18.3%+5.5%+10.7% +23.5%
5 years -61.1%+27.6%+22.0% +68.2%
5 years, per year -17.2%+5.0%+4.1% +11.0%
10 years -55.7%+36.3%+39.5% +263.4%
10 years, per year -7.8%+3.1%+3.4% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureBCEMANUCHTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 22.0%33.5%13.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 23.0%32.0%14.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.230.680.10 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.680.480.80 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -68.2%-54.5%-26.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.3%-14.1%-1.1% -0.9%
52-week high $26.45$24.19$48.73 $779.14
52-week low $18.79$15.20$40.74 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBCEMANUCHT
P/E now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 11.6x -61.9xmedian 16.8x 27.9xmedian 11.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 1.1x 4.0xmedian 1.9x 4.7xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 6.8x 13.0xmedian 10.2x —median 6.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -8.7xmedian 6.3x 9.9xmedian 11.2x 59.8xmedian 6.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.2x 18.2xmedian 2.2x 3.3xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.08median 0.24 3.66median 0.44 2.08median 0.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBCEMANUCHT
Revenue $21.97B $909.31M $7.90B
Gross profit $18.64B -$21.12M $2.88B
Operating income $9.82B $30.28M $1.61B
Net income $4.68B -$57.81M $1.34B
Free cash flow -$2.14B $363.93M $625.04M
R&D – – $144.76M
EPS (diluted) $5.37 $-0.34 $1.72
Cash & equivalents $335.70M $89.13M $1.32B
Total debt $29.40B $3.96B $620.49M
Shares (diluted) 929.10M 172.43M 777.60M
Enterprise value $17.02B $3.28B $29.88B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBCEMANUCHT
P/E 3.7x -61.9x 27.9x
P/FCF -8.7x 9.9x 59.8x
P/Operating cash flow 3.0x 14.3x –
P/S 0.9x 4.0x 4.7x
P/B 1.1x 18.2x 3.3x
P/Tangible book 4.3x 18.2x 3.3x
EV/EBITDA 3.5x 13.0x –
EV/EBIT 4.9x 146.8x 21.8x
EV/Revenue 2.2x 4.9x 4.4x
EV/FCF -22.3x 12.2x 56.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.6x 17.5x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.08 3.66 2.08

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBCEMANUCHT
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.2% 5.5% 8.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.2% 5.2% 3.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.8% 24.6% 7.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.6% – 2.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -10.8% 223.3% 6.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 87.6% 62.2% 1.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 1,063% -36.0% 8.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 36.8% -19.1% -0.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 1,649% -35.3% 52.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 44.4% -16.9% 13.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -7.0% 128.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.4% 22.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -144.0% 141.3% -11.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -32.6% 34.6% 2.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBCEMANUCHT
Gross margin 84.8% -2.3% 36.5%
EBITDA margin 62.9% 37.6% –
Operating margin 44.7% 3.3% 20.3%
Pretax margin 52.5% -7.0% 21.0%
Net margin 22.7% -6.4% 17.0%
FCF margin -9.8% 40.0% 7.9%
Operating cash flow margin 28.6% 27.8% –
Return on equity 31.0% -26.5% 11.3%
Return on assets 9.0% -2.8% 1.9%
Return on invested capital 20.9% 2.6% 10.7%
Return on capital employed 19.5% 2.5% 2.4%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.4x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x -4.4x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBCEMANUCHT
Debt / assets 51.5% 44.5% 1.1%
Debt / equity 1.8x 4.6x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 2.4x –
Debt / FCF -13.7x 2.5x 0.3x
Liabilities / assets 70.6% 90.3% 34.0%
Equity / assets 29.4% 9.7% 66.0%
Interest coverage 10.5x 0.5x 144.6x
Current ratio 0.7x 0.3x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.2x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.1x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 1.15 0.97 6.02

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBCEMANUCHT
Dividend yield 8.2% – 3.3%
Net buyback yield -0.5% – –
Shareholder yield 7.6% 0.0% 3.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 41.1% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) -89.7% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 146.7% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 34.6% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBCEMANUCHT
Forward P/E 11.1xFY2026 – 28.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.80FY2026 $-0.18FY2027 $1.71FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -11.8%FY2026 – +8.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -2.2% – +3.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.56BFY2026 $1.07BFY2027 $7.63BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.2%FY2026 +19.6%FY2027 +2.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.8% -6.0% +12.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBCEMANUCHT
Held by institutions 48.1% 17.1% 2.6%
Institutions holding 394 125 218
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.3% +5.0% +1.3%
Institutions buying 184 63 136
Institutions selling 130 30 47
Buyers to sellers 1.42 2.10 2.89

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BCEMANUCHT
BCE 1.00 0.12 0.21
MANU 0.12 1.00 0.22
CHT 0.21 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BCE, MANU and CHT?

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bce (BCE) $18.68B, Manchester United (MANU) $3.62B, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) $37.38B.

Which stock is cheaper, BCE, MANU and CHT?

Bce (BCE) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bce (BCE) 3.7x, Manchester United (MANU) -61.9x, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 27.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bce (BCE) is cheapest (Bce (BCE) 11.1x, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 28.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bce (BCE) +2.2%, Manchester United (MANU) +5.5%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +8.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bce (BCE) has the highest net margin (Bce (BCE) 22.7%, Manchester United (MANU) -6.4%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 17.0%). On return on invested capital, Bce (BCE) leads (Bce (BCE) 20.9%, Manchester United (MANU) 2.6%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 10.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Manchester United (MANU) returned the most: Bce (BCE) -15.0%, Manchester United (MANU) +16.2%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +11.0%. Over five years, Manchester United (MANU) compounded fastest (Bce (BCE) -17.2%/yr, Manchester United (MANU) +5.0%/yr, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +4.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Bce (BCE) has the highest dividend yield: Bce (BCE) 8.16%, Manchester United (MANU) 0.00%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 3.34%. Manchester United (MANU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) has been the steadiest (Bce (BCE) 22.0%, Manchester United (MANU) 33.5%, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 13.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BCE, MANU and CHT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bce (BCE) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.