BAND vs ZM vs NICE Stock Comparison

Bandwidth, Zoom Communications and Nice Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CXDO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BAND Bandwidth Inc.
$43.35 -30.7% 1M +199.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.22B
P/E
306.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$870.37M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
3 wins
ZM Zoom Communications, Inc.
$91.84 -1.9% 1M +9.6% 1Y
Market cap
$26.03B
P/E
8.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.99B
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
4 wins
NICE NICE Ltd.
$99.59 -14.0% 1M -23.3% 1Y
Market cap
$5.98B
P/E
5.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.82B
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Zoom Communications leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Zoom Communications 4, Bandwidth 3, Nice 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBANDZMNICELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.22B $26.03B $5.98B ZM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 306.9x 8.0x 5.9x NICE
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.4x 14.2x 9.1x NICE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.1% +5.0% +8.3% BAND
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.5% 65.2% 14.9% ZM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -1.6% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +199.4% +9.6% -23.3% BAND
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -12.6%/yr -19.1%/yr -18.5%/yr BAND
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 96.1% 44.8% 55.8% ZM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 75/100 48/100 ZM

Percentile Scorecard

BANDZMNICE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBANDZMNICE
Valuation 50 #15 of 29 68 #10 of 29 100 #1 of 29
Growth 74 #8 of 28 63 #11 of 28 37 #18 of 28
Profitability 31 #19 of 27 85 #5 of 27 73 #8 of 27
Financial Health 47 #17 of 31 97 #2 of 31 30 #22 of 31
Shareholder Returns 43 #13 of 22 62 #9 of 22 0 #22 of 22
Overall 49 75 48
  • BAND ranked among 31 companies in Workplace Software
  • ZM ranked among 31 companies in Workplace Software
  • NICE ranked among 31 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBANDZMNICESPY
1 month -30.7%-1.9%-14.0% -1.0%
3 months -5.1%-8.7%+0.2% -0.4%
6 months -6.7%-12.6%+2.8% +4.5%
Year to date +180.6%+6.4%-11.9% +12.4%
1 year +199.4%+9.6%-23.3% +13.6%
3 years +238.9%+45.8%-40.7% +76.4%
3 years, per year +50.3%+13.4%-16.0% +20.8%
5 years -48.8%-65.3%-64.0% +63.7%
5 years, per year -12.6%-19.1%-18.5% +10.4%
10 years ——+53.4% +267.7%
10 years, per year ——+4.4% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureBANDZMNICESPY
Volatility, 1Y 96.1%44.8%55.8% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 92.7%42.7%60.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.431.040.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.070.21-0.42 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.1%-79.1%-73.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.7%-17.9%-25.3% -1.6%
52-week high $78.44$111.88$133.38 $779.14
52-week low $12.82$72.72$83.15 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBANDZMNICE
P/E now vs peer median 350.8xmedian 34.9x 8.3xmedian 34.9x 6.1xmedian 34.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 2.3x 5.4xmedian 2.3x 0.9xmedian 2.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 26.1xmedian 12.5x 12.5xmedian 12.5x 3.4xmedian 12.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.0xmedian 14.3x 13.9xmedian 14.3x 6.3xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 3.3x 2.4xmedian 3.3x —median 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median -8.17median 0.74 0.04median 0.74 0.52median 0.74

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBANDZMNICE
Revenue $870.37M $4.99B $6.82B
Gross profit $319.33M $3.86B $4.42B
Operating income -$11.31M $1.19B $1.18B
Net income $8.75M $3.26B $863.52M
Free cash flow $96.37M $1.93B $950.80M
R&D $149.43M $903.44M $868.87M
EPS (diluted) $0.12 $10.86 $16.01
Cash & equivalents $171.32M $931.99M $312.31M
Total debt $310.58M – –
Shares (diluted) 33.49M 299.75M 63.32M
Enterprise value $706.82M -$4.70B $4.56B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBANDZMNICE
P/E 350.8x 8.3x 6.1x
P/FCF 14.0x 13.9x 6.3x
P/Operating cash flow 11.9x 13.4x 4.2x
P/S 1.6x 5.4x 0.9x
P/B 3.5x 2.4x –
P/Tangible book 5.1x 2.4x –
EV/EBITDA 26.1x 12.5x 3.4x
EV/EBIT -131.7x 16.5x 4.8x
EV/Revenue 1.7x 3.9x 0.8x
EV/FCF 15.4x 10.2x 6.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.1x 9.8x 4.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -8.17 0.04 0.52

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBANDZMNICE
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.1% 5.0% 8.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 13.7% 3.8% 53.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.8% 6.3% 5.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.3% 4.6% 51.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 13.8% 22.0% -10.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.6% 112.2% 47.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 175.0% 174.0% -31.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -32.2% 184.3% 40.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 130.8% 181.7% -22.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -42.9% 186.2% 11.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 30.3% 4.6% -19.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 55.5% 16.6% 50.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 44.1% 4.4% -22.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 262.7% 19.0% 24.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBANDZMNICE
Gross margin 36.7% 77.3% 64.8%
EBITDA margin 6.5% 31.4% 24.7%
Operating margin -1.3% 23.7% 17.3%
Pretax margin 0.1% 83.8% 19.0%
Net margin 0.5% 65.2% 14.9%
FCF margin 11.1% 38.6% 13.9%
Operating cash flow margin 13.1% 40.1% 20.8%
Return on equity 2.3% 30.6% –
Return on assets 0.8% 25.3% 16.7%
Return on invested capital -1.6% – –
Return on capital employed -1.2% 11.0% 29.3%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.4x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 13.0x 0.6x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 6.1% 14.6% 5.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBANDZMNICE
Debt / assets 28.4% – –
Debt / equity 0.8x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x – –
Debt / FCF 3.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 65.1% 16.8% –
Equity / assets 34.9% 83.2% –
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.9x 3.8x 1.4x
Quick ratio 2.2x 3.7x 1.1x
Cash ratio 1.1x 3.4x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 1.97 9.03 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBANDZMNICE
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 2.2% 5.2% -24.3%
Shareholder yield 2.2% 5.2% -24.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBANDZMNICE
Forward P/E 25.4xFY2026 14.2xFY2026 9.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.71FY2026 $6.45FY2026 $10.91FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +19.6%FY2026 +9.0%FY2026 -11.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +15.8% +2.8% +19.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $938.18MFY2026 $4.76BFY2026 $3.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +24.5%FY2026 -2.4%FY2026 +12.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -3.9% +8.0% -2.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBANDZMNICE
Held by institutions 92.9% 76.2% 56.3%
Institutions holding 242 865 322
Change in shares held, QoQ +27.2% +2.9% +7.0%
Institutions buying 172 480 147
Institutions selling 52 279 131
Buyers to sellers 3.31 1.72 1.12

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BANDZMNICE
BAND 1.00 0.30 0.20
ZM 0.30 1.00 0.37
NICE 0.20 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BAND, ZM and NICE?

Zoom Communications (ZM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bandwidth (BAND) $1.22B, Zoom Communications (ZM) $26.03B, Nice (NICE) $5.98B.

Which stock is cheaper, BAND, ZM and NICE?

Nice (NICE) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bandwidth (BAND) 306.9x, Zoom Communications (ZM) 8.0x, Nice (NICE) 5.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Nice (NICE) is cheapest (Bandwidth (BAND) 25.4x, Zoom Communications (ZM) 14.2x, Nice (NICE) 9.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bandwidth (BAND) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bandwidth (BAND) +15.1%, Zoom Communications (ZM) +5.0%, Nice (NICE) +8.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Zoom Communications (ZM) has the highest net margin (Bandwidth (BAND) 0.5%, Zoom Communications (ZM) 65.2%, Nice (NICE) 14.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bandwidth (BAND) returned the most: Bandwidth (BAND) +199.4%, Zoom Communications (ZM) +9.6%, Nice (NICE) -23.3%. Over five years, Bandwidth (BAND) compounded fastest (Bandwidth (BAND) -12.6%/yr, Zoom Communications (ZM) -19.1%/yr, Nice (NICE) -18.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Zoom Communications (ZM) has been the steadiest (Bandwidth (BAND) 96.1%, Zoom Communications (ZM) 44.8%, Nice (NICE) 55.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BAND, ZM and NICE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Zoom Communications (ZM) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.