BAND vs SANG Stock Comparison

Bandwidth and Sangoma Technologies Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BAND Bandwidth Inc.
$46.89 -24.1% 1M +180.6% 1Y
Market cap
$1.59B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$828.24M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
5 wins
SANG Sangoma Technologies Corp
$4.65 +31.0% 1M -11.3% 1Y
Market cap
$153.59M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$203.08M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Bandwidth leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Bandwidth 5, Sangoma Technologies 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBANDSANGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.59B $153.59M BAND
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -631.6x -1.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.4x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.3% -14.2% BAND
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.3% -39.0% BAND
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% 54.0% SANG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 0.2x SANG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +180.6% -11.3% BAND
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -11.1%/yr -26.5%/yr BAND
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 95.1% 51.2% SANG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 42/100 SANG

Percentile Scorecard

BANDSANG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBANDSANG
Valuation 39 #18 of 29 93 #3 of 29
Growth 27 #20 of 27 0 #27 of 27
Profitability 28 #19 of 26 48 #14 of 26
Financial Health 43 #18 of 31 50 #16 of 31
Shareholder Returns 25 #13 of 17 19 #14 of 17
Overall 33 42
  • BAND ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • SANG ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBANDSANGSPY
1 month -24.1%+31.0% -0.8%
3 months -18.0%+11.8% +3.5%
6 months +94.5%+7.1% +7.0%
Year to date +203.5%-8.3% +12.2%
1 year +180.6%-11.3% +13.0%
3 years +390.5%+63.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year +70.0%+17.7% +23.1%
5 years -44.5%-78.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -11.1%-26.5% +11.0%
10 years —+121.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+8.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBANDSANGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 95.1%51.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 91.0%42.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.440.20 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.90-0.22 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.3%-89.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -40.2%-13.9% -1.8%
52-week high $78.44$5.40 $779.14
52-week low $12.82$3.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBANDSANG
P/E now vs peer median -598.3xmedian 31.9x -2.0xmedian 31.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 2.4x 0.8xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 32.5xmedian 11.5x 1.7xmedian 11.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 18.7xmedian 14.2x 7.1xmedian 14.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 3.0x 0.9xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 21.43median 0.77 0.05median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBANDSANG
Revenue $828.24M $203.08M
Gross profit $308.33M $143.68M
Operating income -$15.11M $66.76M
Net income $2.26M -$81.09M
Free cash flow $77.35M $21.92M
R&D $145.95M $42.90M
EPS (diluted) $-0.08 $-2.38
Cash & equivalents $169.90M $10.43M
Total debt $330.77M $89.10M
Shares (diluted) 33.49M 33.24M
Enterprise value $1.17B $95.10M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBANDSANG
P/E -598.3x -2.0x
P/FCF 18.7x 7.1x
P/Operating cash flow 14.7x 6.5x
P/S 1.7x 0.8x
P/B 3.8x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 5.6x 1.3x
EV/EBITDA 32.5x 1.7x
EV/EBIT -105.9x 2.6x
EV/Revenue 1.9x 0.8x
EV/FCF 20.7x 7.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.3x 7.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 21.43 0.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBANDSANG
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.3% -14.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.0% -7.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.3% -11.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.4% -6.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -25.9% -18.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 18.3% -18.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 122.6% -1,519%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -58.8% -40.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 77.6% -1,493%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -27.9% -39.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.9% -43.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 46.5% -9.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 14.0% -50.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 117.7% -8.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBANDSANG
Gross margin 37.2% 70.7%
EBITDA margin 5.9% 50.3%
Operating margin -1.8% 32.9%
Pretax margin -0.7% -41.7%
Net margin -0.3% -39.0%
FCF margin 9.3% 10.8%
Operating cash flow margin 11.9% 11.7%
Return on equity 0.6% -87.1%
Return on assets 0.2% –
Return on invested capital 0.0% 54.0%
Return on capital employed -1.7% –
Asset turnover 0.8x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 43.5x -0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 6.3% 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBANDSANG
Debt / assets 30.0% 11.6%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 0.2x
Debt / FCF 4.3x 1.2x
Liabilities / assets 65.7% 25.8%
Equity / assets 34.3% 74.2%
Interest coverage – 33.0x
Current ratio 2.0x 0.8x
Quick ratio 2.3x 0.5x
Cash ratio 1.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 1.98 1.92

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBANDSANG
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield 1.4% -0.1%
Shareholder yield 1.4% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBANDSANG
Forward P/E 27.4xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.71FY2026 $-0.17FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +19.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +15.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $938.18MFY2026 $192.47MFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +24.5%FY2026 -3.8%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after -3.9% +3.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBANDSANG
Held by institutions 98.8% –
Institutions holding 240 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +27.1% –
Institutions buying 171 –
Institutions selling 52 –
Buyers to sellers 3.29 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BANDSANG
BAND 1.00 0.07
SANG 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BAND and SANG?

Bandwidth (BAND) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bandwidth (BAND) $1.59B, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) $153.59M.

Which company is growing faster?

Bandwidth (BAND) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bandwidth (BAND) +9.3%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -14.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bandwidth (BAND) has the highest net margin (Bandwidth (BAND) -0.3%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -39.0%). On return on invested capital, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) leads (Bandwidth (BAND) 0.0%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 54.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bandwidth (BAND) returned the most: Bandwidth (BAND) +180.6%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -11.3%. Over five years, Bandwidth (BAND) compounded fastest (Bandwidth (BAND) -11.1%/yr, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -26.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) has been the steadiest (Bandwidth (BAND) 95.1%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 51.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do BAND and SANG move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.07, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, BAND and SANG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bandwidth (BAND) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.