BAND vs SANG vs RNG Stock Comparison

Bandwidth, Sangoma Technologies and RingCentral Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BAND Bandwidth Inc.
$43.35 -30.7% 1M +199.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.22B
P/E
306.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$870.37M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
3 wins
SANG Sangoma Technologies Corp
$4.52 -6.4% 1M -11.2% 1Y
Market cap
$149.10M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$203.08M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
3 wins
RNG RingCentral, Inc.
$77.94 -1.4% 1M +183.7% 1Y
Market cap
$6.22B
P/E
9.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.62B
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

RingCentral leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (RingCentral 5, Bandwidth 3, Sangoma Technologies 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBANDSANGRNGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.22B $149.10M $6.22B RNG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 306.9x -1.9x 9.4x RNG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.4x — 14.8x RNG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.1% -14.2% +5.5% BAND
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.5% -39.0% 25.3% RNG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -1.6% 54.0% 26.1% SANG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 0.2x 1.5x SANG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +199.4% -11.2% +183.7% BAND
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -12.6%/yr -26.6%/yr -19.8%/yr BAND
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 96.1% 50.7% 67.2% SANG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 44/100 64/100 RNG

Percentile Scorecard

BANDSANGRNG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBANDSANGRNG
Valuation 50 #15 of 29 96 #2 of 29 75 #8 of 29
Growth 74 #8 of 28 0 #28 of 28 82 #6 of 28
Profitability 31 #19 of 27 46 #15 of 27 77 #7 of 27
Financial Health 47 #17 of 31 50 #16 of 31 20 #25 of 31
Shareholder Returns 43 #13 of 22 29 #16 of 22 67 #8 of 22
Overall 49 44 64
  • BAND ranked among 31 companies in Workplace Software
  • SANG ranked among 31 companies in Workplace Software
  • RNG ranked among 31 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBANDSANGRNGSPY
1 month -30.7%-6.4%-1.4% -1.0%
3 months -5.1%+13.3%+26.7% -0.4%
6 months -6.7%+6.1%+70.5% +4.5%
Year to date +180.6%-10.8%+169.9% +12.4%
1 year +199.4%-11.2%+183.7% +13.6%
3 years +238.9%+46.8%+175.2% +76.4%
3 years, per year +50.3%+13.6%+40.2% +20.8%
5 years -48.8%-78.7%-66.7% +63.7%
5 years, per year -12.6%-26.6%-19.8% +10.4%
10 years —+115.2%+288.7% +267.7%
10 years, per year —+8.0%+14.5% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureBANDSANGRNGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 96.1%50.7%67.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 92.7%41.4%54.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.430.211.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.07-0.222.73 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.1%-88.6%-92.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.7%-16.3%-9.7% -1.6%
52-week high $78.44$5.40$86.35 $779.14
52-week low $12.82$3.42$24.82 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBANDSANGRNG
P/E now vs peer median 350.8xmedian 34.9x -1.9xmedian 34.9x 9.9xmedian 34.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 2.3x 0.7xmedian 2.3x 2.5xmedian 2.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 26.1xmedian 12.5x 1.6xmedian 12.5x 12.9xmedian 12.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.0xmedian 14.3x 6.9xmedian 14.3x 9.9xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 3.3x 0.9xmedian 3.3x -531.4xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median -8.17median 0.74 0.05median 0.74 0.18median 0.74

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBANDSANGRNG
Revenue $870.37M $203.08M $2.62B
Gross profit $319.33M $143.68M $1.89B
Operating income -$11.31M $66.76M $196.64M
Net income $8.75M -$81.09M $662.40M
Free cash flow $96.37M $21.92M $667.24M
R&D $149.43M $42.90M $330.14M
EPS (diluted) $0.12 $-2.38 $7.55
Cash & equivalents $171.32M $10.43M $110.12M
Total debt $310.58M $27.30M $1.01B
Shares (diluted) 33.49M 33.24M 87.69M
Enterprise value $706.82M $90.61M $5.75B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBANDSANGRNG
P/E 350.8x -1.9x 9.9x
P/FCF 14.0x 6.9x 9.9x
P/Operating cash flow 11.9x 6.4x 9.4x
P/S 1.6x 0.7x 2.5x
P/B 3.5x 0.9x -531.4x
P/Tangible book 5.1x 1.3x -116.7x
EV/EBITDA 26.1x 1.6x 12.9x
EV/EBIT -131.7x 2.5x 38.1x
EV/Revenue 1.7x 0.8x 2.9x
EV/FCF 15.4x 7.6x 11.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.1x 7.1x 10.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -8.17 0.05 0.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBANDSANGRNG
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.1% -14.2% 5.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 13.7% -7.0% 6.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.8% -11.2% 7.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.3% -6.0% 8.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 13.8% -17.1% 109.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.6% -18.7% 35.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 175.0% -1,519% 4,905%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -32.2% -40.8% 53.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 130.8% -1,493% 5,149%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -42.9% -39.6% 55.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 30.3% -43.3% 16.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 55.5% -9.9% 29.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 44.1% -50.4% 16.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 262.7% -8.2% 30.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBANDSANGRNG
Gross margin 36.7% 70.7% 72.2%
EBITDA margin 6.5% 50.3% 22.2%
Operating margin -1.3% 32.9% 7.5%
Pretax margin 0.1% -41.7% 5.0%
Net margin 0.5% -39.0% 25.3%
FCF margin 11.1% 10.8% 25.5%
Operating cash flow margin 13.1% 11.7% 26.7%
Return on equity 2.3% -87.1% –
Return on assets 0.8% – 40.7%
Return on invested capital -1.6% 54.0% 26.1%
Return on capital employed -1.2% – 20.7%
Asset turnover 0.8x – 1.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 13.0x -0.3x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 6.1% 1.2% 9.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBANDSANGRNG
Debt / assets 28.4% 11.6% 53.9%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.2x -81.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 0.2x 1.5x
Debt / FCF 3.2x 1.2x 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 65.1% 25.8% 100.7%
Equity / assets 34.9% 74.2% -0.7%
Interest coverage – 33.0x 3.1x
Current ratio 1.9x 0.8x 1.1x
Quick ratio 2.2x 0.5x 0.9x
Cash ratio 1.1x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 1.97 1.88 3.04

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBANDSANGRNG
Dividend yield – – 0.3%
Net buyback yield 2.2% -0.1% 4.9%
Shareholder yield 2.2% -0.1% 5.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBANDSANGRNG
Forward P/E 25.4xFY2026 – 14.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.71FY2026 $-0.17FY2027 $5.28FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +19.6%FY2026 – +21.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +15.8% – +0.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $938.18MFY2026 $192.47MFY2027 $2.76BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +24.5%FY2026 -3.8%FY2027 +9.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -3.9% +3.5% -3.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBANDSANGRNG
Held by institutions 92.9% – 100.0%
Institutions holding 242 – 379
Change in shares held, QoQ +27.2% – +2.0%
Institutions buying 172 – 212
Institutions selling 52 – 121
Buyers to sellers 3.31 – 1.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BANDSANGRNG
BAND 1.00 0.08 0.30
SANG 0.08 1.00 0.04
RNG 0.30 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BAND, SANG and RNG?

RingCentral (RNG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bandwidth (BAND) $1.22B, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) $149.10M, RingCentral (RNG) $6.22B.

Which stock is cheaper, BAND, SANG and RNG?

RingCentral (RNG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bandwidth (BAND) 306.9x, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -1.9x, RingCentral (RNG) 9.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, RingCentral (RNG) is cheapest (Bandwidth (BAND) 25.4x, RingCentral (RNG) 14.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bandwidth (BAND) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bandwidth (BAND) +15.1%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -14.2%, RingCentral (RNG) +5.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

RingCentral (RNG) has the highest net margin (Bandwidth (BAND) 0.5%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -39.0%, RingCentral (RNG) 25.3%). On return on invested capital, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) leads (Bandwidth (BAND) -1.6%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 54.0%, RingCentral (RNG) 26.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bandwidth (BAND) returned the most: Bandwidth (BAND) +199.4%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -11.2%, RingCentral (RNG) +183.7%. Over five years, Bandwidth (BAND) compounded fastest (Bandwidth (BAND) -12.6%/yr, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -26.6%/yr, RingCentral (RNG) -19.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) has been the steadiest (Bandwidth (BAND) 96.1%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 50.7%, RingCentral (RNG) 67.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BAND, SANG and RNG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, RingCentral (RNG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.