BAND vs OOMA vs EGHT Stock Comparison

Bandwidth, Ooma and 8X8 Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (NICE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BAND Bandwidth Inc.
$49.27 -20.3% 1M +190.5% 1Y
Market cap
$1.60B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$828.24M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
2 wins
OOMA Ooma Inc
$20.09 -7.8% 1M +75.0% 1Y
Market cap
$560.67M
P/E
51.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$306.59M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
7 wins
EGHT 8X8 Inc /De/
$2.26 -1.7% 1M +15.9% 1Y
Market cap
$304.62M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Ooma leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Ooma 7, Bandwidth 2, 8X8 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBANDOOMAEGHTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.60B $560.67M $304.62M BAND
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -637.0x 51.3x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.8x 15.6x 6.6x EGHT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.3% +17.2% — OOMA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.3% 3.6% — OOMA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% 7.4% — OOMA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 1.1x — OOMA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +190.5% +75.0% +15.9% BAND
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -10.3%/yr -1.9%/yr -36.9%/yr OOMA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 95.0% 45.5% 82.9% OOMA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 55/100 — OOMA

Percentile Scorecard

BANDOOMAEGHT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBANDOOMAEGHT
Valuation 39 #18 of 29 50 #15 of 29 –
Growth 27 #20 of 27 100 #1 of 27 –
Profitability 28 #19 of 26 56 #12 of 26 –
Financial Health 43 #18 of 31 37 #20 of 31 33 #21 of 31
Shareholder Returns 25 #13 of 17 31 #12 of 17 –
Overall 33 55 –
  • BAND ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • OOMA ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • EGHT ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBANDOOMAEGHTSPY
1 month -20.3%-7.8%-1.7% -0.2%
3 months -5.7%-9.5%+18.3% +3.9%
6 months +105.9%+23.2%+21.5% +8.2%
Year to date +218.9%+71.3%+14.7% +12.9%
1 year +190.5%+75.0%+15.9% +12.3%
3 years +415.4%+87.1%-2.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year +72.8%+23.2%-0.9% +23.3%
5 years -42.0%-9.1%-90.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year -10.3%-1.9%-36.9% +10.9%
10 years —+127.8%-84.4% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+8.6%-16.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBANDOOMAEGHTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 95.0%45.5%82.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 91.0%44.8%68.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.460.680.90 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.001.650.19 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.3%-71.8%-93.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -37.2%-14.1%-18.1% -1.2%
52-week high $78.44$23.39$2.76 $779.14
52-week low $12.82$10.58$1.59 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBANDOOMAEGHT
P/E now vs peer median -628.7xmedian 31.0x 50.6xmedian 31.0x —median 31.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 2.4x 1.8xmedian 2.4x —median 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 34.0xmedian 11.3x 22.7xmedian 11.3x —median 11.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.6xmedian 15.6x 18.3xmedian 15.6x —median 15.6x
P/B now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 3.0x 5.6xmedian 3.0x 2.1xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 22.52median 0.74 0.71median 0.74 —median 0.74

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBANDOOMAEGHT
Revenue $828.24M $306.59M –
Gross profit $308.33M $188.46M –
Operating income -$15.11M $10.90M –
Net income $2.26M $10.93M –
Free cash flow $77.35M $30.30M –
R&D $145.95M $55.82M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.08 $0.38 –
Cash & equivalents $169.90M $17.53M $93.26M
Total debt $330.77M $46.45M $121.65M
Shares (diluted) 33.49M 28.88M 142.93M
Enterprise value $1.19B $484.11M -$32.69M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBANDOOMAEGHT
P/E -628.7x 50.6x –
P/FCF 19.6x 18.3x –
P/Operating cash flow 15.4x 14.9x –
P/S 1.8x 1.8x –
P/B 4.0x 5.6x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 5.9x 13.2x 3.5x
EV/EBITDA 34.0x 22.7x –
EV/EBIT -110.8x 53.5x –
EV/Revenue 2.0x 1.9x –
EV/FCF 21.6x 19.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow 17.0x 15.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 22.52 0.71 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBANDOOMAEGHT
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.3% 17.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.0% 10.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.3% 18.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.4% 9.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -25.9% 723.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 18.3% 68.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 122.6% 823.4% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -58.8% 74.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) 77.6% 804.6% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -27.9% 70.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.9% 42.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 46.5% 51.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 14.0% 50.0% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 117.7% 86.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBANDOOMAEGHT
Gross margin 37.2% 61.5% –
EBITDA margin 5.9% 8.4% –
Operating margin -1.8% 3.6% –
Pretax margin -0.7% 2.9% –
Net margin -0.3% 3.6% –
FCF margin 9.3% 9.9% –
Operating cash flow margin 11.9% 12.1% –
Return on equity 0.6% 11.1% –
Return on assets 0.2% 4.8% –
Return on invested capital 0.0% 7.4% –
Return on capital employed -1.7% 7.1% –
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 43.5x 3.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 6.3% 4.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBANDOOMAEGHT
Debt / assets 30.0% 20.5% 18.4%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.5x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 1.1x –
Debt / FCF 4.3x 1.5x –
Liabilities / assets 65.7% 56.5% 77.9%
Equity / assets 34.3% 43.5% 22.1%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 2.0x 1.0x 1.1x
Quick ratio 2.3x 0.4x 0.8x
Cash ratio 1.2x 0.2x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 2.04 3.30 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBANDOOMAEGHT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 1.3% 1.7% –
Shareholder yield 1.3% 1.7% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBANDOOMAEGHT
Forward P/E 28.8xFY2026 15.6xFY2026 6.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.71FY2026 $1.29FY2026 $0.34FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +19.6%FY2026 +24.0%FY2026 -15.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +15.8% +13.2% +14.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $938.18MFY2026 $319.05MFY2026 $732.17MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +24.5%FY2026 +16.6%FY2026 -0.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -3.9% +14.4% +3.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBANDOOMAEGHT
Held by institutions 98.8% 71.9% 71.6%
Institutions holding 240 167 172
Change in shares held, QoQ +27.1% +5.9% -4.2%
Institutions buying 171 102 84
Institutions selling 52 37 64
Buyers to sellers 3.29 2.76 1.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BANDOOMAEGHT
BAND 1.00 0.25 0.27
OOMA 0.25 1.00 0.32
EGHT 0.27 0.32 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BAND, OOMA and EGHT?

Bandwidth (BAND) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bandwidth (BAND) $1.60B, Ooma (OOMA) $560.67M, 8X8 (EGHT) $304.62M.

Which company is growing faster?

Ooma (OOMA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bandwidth (BAND) +9.3%, Ooma (OOMA) +17.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ooma (OOMA) has the highest net margin (Bandwidth (BAND) -0.3%, Ooma (OOMA) 3.6%). On return on invested capital, Ooma (OOMA) leads (Bandwidth (BAND) 0.0%, Ooma (OOMA) 7.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bandwidth (BAND) returned the most: Bandwidth (BAND) +190.5%, Ooma (OOMA) +75.0%, 8X8 (EGHT) +15.9%. Over five years, Ooma (OOMA) compounded fastest (Bandwidth (BAND) -10.3%/yr, Ooma (OOMA) -1.9%/yr, 8X8 (EGHT) -36.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ooma (OOMA) has been the steadiest (Bandwidth (BAND) 95.0%, Ooma (OOMA) 45.5%, 8X8 (EGHT) 82.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BAND, OOMA and EGHT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ooma (OOMA) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.