BAND vs NICE vs RNG Stock Comparison

Bandwidth, Nice and RingCentral Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CXDO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BAND Bandwidth Inc.
$43.35 -30.7% 1M +199.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.35B
P/E
350.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$870.37M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
3 wins
NICE NICE Ltd.
$99.59 -14.0% 1M -23.3% 1Y
Market cap
$6.02B
P/E
6.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.82B
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
3 wins
RNG RingCentral, Inc.
$77.94 -1.4% 1M +183.7% 1Y
Market cap
$6.58B
P/E
9.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.62B
Div. yield
0.35%
Communications Platforms Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

RingCentral leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (RingCentral 5, Nice 3, Bandwidth 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBANDNICERNGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.35B $6.02B $6.58B RNG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 350.8x 6.1x 9.9x NICE
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.4x 9.1x 14.8x NICE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.1% +8.3% +5.5% BAND
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.5% 14.9% 25.3% RNG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -1.6% — 26.1% RNG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x — 1.5x RNG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.35% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +199.4% -23.3% +183.7% BAND
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -12.6%/yr -18.5%/yr -19.8%/yr BAND
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 96.1% 55.8% 67.2% NICE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 48/100 64/100 RNG

Percentile Scorecard

BANDNICERNG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBANDNICERNG
Valuation 50 #15 of 29 100 #1 of 29 75 #8 of 29
Growth 74 #8 of 28 37 #18 of 28 82 #6 of 28
Profitability 31 #19 of 27 73 #8 of 27 77 #7 of 27
Financial Health 47 #17 of 31 30 #22 of 31 20 #25 of 31
Shareholder Returns 43 #13 of 22 0 #22 of 22 67 #8 of 22
Overall 49 48 64
  • BAND ranked among 31 companies in Workplace Software
  • NICE ranked among 31 companies in Workplace Software
  • RNG ranked among 31 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBANDNICERNGSPY
1 month -30.7%-14.0%-1.4% -1.0%
3 months -5.1%+0.2%+26.7% -0.4%
6 months -6.7%+2.8%+70.5% +4.5%
Year to date +180.6%-11.9%+169.9% +12.4%
1 year +199.4%-23.3%+183.7% +13.6%
3 years +238.9%-40.7%+175.2% +76.4%
3 years, per year +50.3%-16.0%+40.2% +20.8%
5 years -48.8%-64.0%-66.7% +63.7%
5 years, per year -12.6%-18.5%-19.8% +10.4%
10 years —+53.4%+288.7% +267.7%
10 years, per year —+4.4%+14.5% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureBANDNICERNGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 96.1%55.8%67.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 92.7%60.0%54.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.430.131.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.07-0.422.73 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.1%-73.6%-92.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.7%-25.3%-9.7% -1.6%
52-week high $78.44$133.38$86.35 $779.14
52-week low $12.82$83.15$24.82 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBANDNICERNG
P/E now vs peer median 350.8xmedian 34.9x 6.1xmedian 34.9x 9.9xmedian 34.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 2.3x 0.9xmedian 2.3x 2.5xmedian 2.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 26.1xmedian 12.5x 3.4xmedian 12.5x 12.9xmedian 12.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.0xmedian 14.3x 6.3xmedian 14.3x 9.9xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 3.3x —median 3.3x -531.4xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median -8.17median 0.74 0.52median 0.74 0.18median 0.74

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBANDNICERNG
Revenue $870.37M $6.82B $2.62B
Gross profit $319.33M $4.42B $1.89B
Operating income -$11.31M $1.18B $196.64M
Net income $8.75M $863.52M $662.40M
Free cash flow $96.37M $950.80M $667.24M
R&D $149.43M $868.87M $330.14M
EPS (diluted) $0.12 $16.01 $7.55
Cash & equivalents $171.32M $312.31M $110.12M
Total debt $310.58M – $1.01B
Shares (diluted) 33.49M 63.32M 87.69M
Enterprise value $842.01M $4.59B $6.11B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBANDNICERNG
P/E 350.8x 6.1x 9.9x
P/FCF 14.0x 6.3x 9.9x
P/Operating cash flow 11.9x 4.2x 9.4x
P/S 1.6x 0.9x 2.5x
P/B 3.5x – -531.4x
P/Tangible book 5.1x – -116.7x
EV/EBITDA 26.1x 3.4x 12.9x
EV/EBIT -131.7x 4.8x 38.1x
EV/Revenue 1.7x 0.8x 2.9x
EV/FCF 15.4x 6.0x 11.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.1x 4.0x 10.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -8.17 0.52 0.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBANDNICERNG
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.1% 8.3% 5.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 13.7% 53.4% 6.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.8% 5.3% 7.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.3% 51.8% 8.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 13.8% -10.6% 109.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.6% 47.1% 35.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 175.0% -31.0% 4,905%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -32.2% 40.6% 53.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 130.8% -22.3% 5,149%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -42.9% 11.7% 55.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 30.3% -19.1% 16.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 55.5% 50.4% 29.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 44.1% -22.7% 16.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 262.7% 24.8% 30.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBANDNICERNG
Gross margin 36.7% 64.8% 72.2%
EBITDA margin 6.5% 24.7% 22.2%
Operating margin -1.3% 17.3% 7.5%
Pretax margin 0.1% 19.0% 5.0%
Net margin 0.5% 14.9% 25.3%
FCF margin 11.1% 13.9% 25.5%
Operating cash flow margin 13.1% 20.8% 26.7%
Return on equity 2.3% – –
Return on assets 0.8% 16.7% 40.7%
Return on invested capital -1.6% – 26.1%
Return on capital employed -1.2% 29.3% 20.7%
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.3x 1.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 13.0x 1.6x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 6.1% 5.6% 9.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBANDNICERNG
Debt / assets 28.4% – 53.9%
Debt / equity 0.8x – -81.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x – 1.5x
Debt / FCF 3.2x – 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 65.1% – 100.7%
Equity / assets 34.9% – -0.7%
Interest coverage – – 3.1x
Current ratio 1.9x 1.4x 1.1x
Quick ratio 2.2x 1.1x 0.9x
Cash ratio 1.1x 0.3x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 1.97 – 3.04

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBANDNICERNG
Dividend yield – – 0.3%
Net buyback yield 2.2% -24.3% 4.9%
Shareholder yield 2.2% -24.3% 5.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBANDNICERNG
Forward P/E 25.4xFY2026 9.1xFY2026 14.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.71FY2026 $10.91FY2026 $5.28FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +19.6%FY2026 -11.3%FY2026 +21.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +15.8% +19.1% +0.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $938.18MFY2026 $3.32BFY2026 $2.76BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +24.5%FY2026 +12.5%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -3.9% -2.0% -3.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBANDNICERNG
Held by institutions 92.9% 56.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 242 322 379
Change in shares held, QoQ +27.2% +7.0% +2.0%
Institutions buying 172 147 212
Institutions selling 52 131 121
Buyers to sellers 3.31 1.12 1.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BANDNICERNG
BAND 1.00 0.20 0.30
NICE 0.20 1.00 0.54
RNG 0.30 0.54 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BAND, NICE and RNG?

RingCentral (RNG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bandwidth (BAND) $1.35B, Nice (NICE) $6.02B, RingCentral (RNG) $6.58B.

Which stock is cheaper, BAND, NICE and RNG?

Nice (NICE) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bandwidth (BAND) 350.8x, Nice (NICE) 6.1x, RingCentral (RNG) 9.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Nice (NICE) is cheapest (Bandwidth (BAND) 25.4x, Nice (NICE) 9.1x, RingCentral (RNG) 14.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bandwidth (BAND) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bandwidth (BAND) +15.1%, Nice (NICE) +8.3%, RingCentral (RNG) +5.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

RingCentral (RNG) has the highest net margin (Bandwidth (BAND) 0.5%, Nice (NICE) 14.9%, RingCentral (RNG) 25.3%). On return on invested capital, RingCentral (RNG) leads (Bandwidth (BAND) -1.6%, RingCentral (RNG) 26.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bandwidth (BAND) returned the most: Bandwidth (BAND) +199.4%, Nice (NICE) -23.3%, RingCentral (RNG) +183.7%. Over five years, Bandwidth (BAND) compounded fastest (Bandwidth (BAND) -12.6%/yr, Nice (NICE) -18.5%/yr, RingCentral (RNG) -19.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Nice (NICE) 0.00%, RingCentral (RNG) 0.35%. Bandwidth (BAND) and Nice (NICE) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Nice (NICE) has been the steadiest (Bandwidth (BAND) 96.1%, Nice (NICE) 55.8%, RingCentral (RNG) 67.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BAND, NICE and RNG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, RingCentral (RNG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.