BAM vs OAK-PA vs TPG Stock Comparison

Brookfield Asset Management, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings and Tpg Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
TPG TPG Inc.
$50.16 +12.7% 1M -6.1% 1Y
Market cap
$19.62B
P/E
32.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.17B
Div. yield
4.47%
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Brookfield Asset Management leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Brookfield Asset Management 7, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings 2, Tpg 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBAMOAK-PATPGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $86.44B $3.22B $19.62B BAM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.8x 7.9x 32.0x OAK-PA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 31.1x — 19.1x TPG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +31.9% -2.3% +21.6% BAM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 48.9% 48.6% 5.2% BAM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 26.8% — 14.0% BAM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.5x — 1.3x BAM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 3.58% 0.00% 4.47% TPG
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +0.4% -7.3% -6.1% BAM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -5.7%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.6% 14.6% 41.0% OAK-PA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 41/100 66/100 BAM

Percentile Scorecard

BAMOAK-PATPG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBAMOAK-PATPG
Valuation 56 #88 of 199 36 #127 of 199 73 #55 of 199
Growth 88 #15 of 117 60 #48 of 117 76 #29 of 117
Profitability 94 #10 of 143 46 #78 of 143 60 #58 of 143
Financial Health 62 #64 of 165 45 #91 of 165 46 #89 of 165
Shareholder Returns 58 #34 of 79 19 #64 of 79 76 #20 of 79
Overall 71 41 66
  • BAM ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • OAK-PA ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • TPG ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBAMOAK-PATPGSPY
1 month +21.0%0.0%+12.7% -1.0%
3 months +2.8%-5.4%+4.7% -0.4%
6 months +11.3%-4.8%+11.4% +4.5%
Year to date +3.3%-4.3%-21.4% +12.4%
1 year +0.4%-7.3%-6.1% +13.6%
3 years +70.9%-7.9%+68.6% +76.4%
3 years, per year +19.6%-2.7%+19.0% +20.8%
5 years —-25.3%— +63.7%
5 years, per year —-5.7%— +10.4%

Risk

MeasureBAMOAK-PATPGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.6%14.6%41.0% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.4%16.5%42.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.310.191.45 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.01-0.50-0.15 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -32.2%-28.7%-46.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.1%-9.8%-28.0% -1.6%
52-week high $55.85$22.24$69.66 $779.14
52-week low $42.87$19.51$37.93 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBAMOAK-PATPG
P/E now vs peer median 30.8xmedian 33.9x 7.9xmedian 33.9x 32.0xmedian 33.9x
P/S now vs peer median 15.1xmedian 4.9x 5.2xmedian 4.9x 3.8xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 22.6xmedian 12.6x —median 12.6x 18.5xmedian 12.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 37.4xmedian 15.5x -13.8xmedian 15.5x 30.7xmedian 15.5x
P/B now vs peer median 9.4xmedian 1.8x 1.6xmedian 1.8x 4.9xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.92 0.35median 0.92 0.95median 0.92

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBAMOAK-PATPG
Revenue $5.74B $617.93M $5.17B
Net income $3.07B $716.53M $742.66M
Free cash flow $2.31B -$233.55M $639.87M
EPS (diluted) $1.74 $2.53 $0.70
Cash & equivalents $1.50B $255.46M $799.79M
Total debt $3.47B $1.50B $2.28B
Shares (diluted) 1.61B 118.83M 385.67M
Enterprise value $82.69B $2.18B $18.81B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBAMOAK-PATPG
P/E 30.8x 7.9x 32.0x
P/FCF 37.4x -13.8x 30.7x
P/Operating cash flow 37.0x -13.8x 26.9x
P/S 15.1x 5.2x 3.8x
P/B 9.4x 1.6x 4.9x
P/Tangible book 9.6x 1.6x 5.7x
EV/EBITDA 22.6x – 18.5x
EV/EBIT 22.9x – 21.6x
EV/Revenue 15.4x 7.2x 4.1x
EV/FCF 38.2x -19.1x 33.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 37.9x -19.1x 28.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.35 0.95

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBAMOAK-PATPG
Revenue growth (1Y) 31.9% -2.3% 21.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -14.4% 36.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 32.8% 44.9% 126.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 9.2% 186.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 16.4% 140.7% 118.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 22.7% 33.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 73.4% -130.2% -17.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 43.7% -26.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 72.8% -130.2% -26.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 43.7% -29.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBAMOAK-PATPG
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 68.1% – 22.1%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 64.7% – 16.3%
Net margin 48.9% 48.6% 5.2%
FCF margin 40.3% -37.8% 12.4%
Operating cash flow margin 40.7% -37.8% 14.1%
Return on equity 34.5% 32.5% 19.3%
Return on assets 16.1% 10.0% 5.2%
Return on invested capital 26.8% – 14.0%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.1x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x -0.3x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 2.4% – 18.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBAMOAK-PATPG
Debt / assets 17.3% 21.2% 15.5%
Debt / equity 0.4x 0.7x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.5x – 1.3x
Debt / FCF 1.5x -6.4x 3.6x
Liabilities / assets 54.2% 70.9% 73.0%
Equity / assets 45.8% 29.1% 27.0%
Interest coverage 27.0x – 7.2x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBAMOAK-PATPG
Dividend yield 3.6% 0.0% 4.5%
Net buyback yield 1.0% – –
Shareholder yield 4.6% 0.0% 4.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 22.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -68.9% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -68.0% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBAMOAK-PATPG
Forward P/E 31.1xFY2026 – 19.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.74FY2026 – $2.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +6.1%FY2026 – +8.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +30.5% – +29.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.57BFY2026 – $2.53BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +20.4%FY2026 – +19.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.7% – +18.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBAMOAK-PATPG
Held by institutions 93.3% – 86.7%
Institutions holding 621 – 373
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% – +10.1%
Institutions buying 294 – 218
Institutions selling 204 – 120
Buyers to sellers 1.44 – 1.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BAMOAK-PATPG
BAM 1.00 0.12 0.71
OAK-PA 0.12 1.00 0.11
TPG 0.71 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BAM, OAK-PA and TPG?

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) $86.44B, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) $3.22B, Tpg (TPG) $19.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, BAM, OAK-PA and TPG?

Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 30.8x, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 7.9x, Tpg (TPG) 32.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Tpg (TPG) is cheapest (Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 31.1x, Tpg (TPG) 19.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) +31.9%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) -2.3%, Tpg (TPG) +21.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) has the highest net margin (Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 48.9%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 48.6%, Tpg (TPG) 5.2%). On return on invested capital, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) leads (Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 26.8%, Tpg (TPG) 14.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) returned the most: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) +0.4%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) -7.3%, Tpg (TPG) -6.1%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Tpg (TPG) has the highest dividend yield: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 3.58%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 0.00%, Tpg (TPG) 4.47%. Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) has been the steadiest (Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 31.6%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 14.6%, Tpg (TPG) 41.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BAM, OAK-PA and TPG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.