BAM vs APO vs BN Stock Comparison

Brookfield Asset Management, Apollo Global Management and Brookfield Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BN BROOKFIELD Corp /ON/
$39.49 +8.2% 1M -15.2% 1Y
Market cap
$87.88B
P/E
69.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$76.56B
Div. yield
–
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Apollo Global Management leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Apollo Global Management 6, Brookfield Asset Management 3, Brookfield 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBAMAPOBNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $76.72B $68.56B $87.88B BN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.4x 38.6x 69.9x BAM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.9x 13.1x 14.2x APO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +31.9% +41.2% -9.6% APO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 48.9% 5.0% 1.6% BAM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 26.8% 5.8% — BAM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.5x -1.8x — APO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -10.9% -5.1% -15.2% APO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +9.0%/yr +3.9%/yr APO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.3% 36.3% 27.7% BN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 74/100 75/100 39/100 APO

Percentile Scorecard

BAMAPOBN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBAMAPOBN
Valuation 58 #77 of 181 87 #25 of 181 76 #44 of 181
Growth 86 #16 of 110 71 #33 of 110 35 #72 of 110
Profitability 94 #9 of 127 63 #48 of 127 31 #88 of 127
Financial Health 67 #55 of 162 80 #34 of 162 39 #100 of 162
Shareholder Returns 68 #25 of 76 73 #21 of 76 15 #65 of 76
Overall 74 75 39
  • BAM ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • APO ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • BN ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBAMAPOBNSPY
1 month +8.0%-0.4%+8.2% +0.7%
3 months +1.3%-1.4%-6.0% +3.7%
6 months +1.2%-7.9%-12.5% +7.1%
Year to date -7.3%-18.1%-13.9% +12.8%
1 year -10.9%-5.1%-15.2% +11.9%
3 years +67.0%+47.9%+103.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year +18.7%+13.9%+26.7% +22.8%
5 years —+54.0%+21.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year —+9.0%+3.9% +10.9%
10 years —+552.0%+216.7% +262.0%
10 years, per year —+20.6%+12.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBAMAPOBNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.3%36.3%27.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.4%37.3%29.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.311.131.36 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.36-0.14-0.55 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -32.2%-43.8%-42.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.0%-22.4%-19.7% -1.2%
52-week high $55.85$152.70$49.17 $779.14
52-week low $42.87$100.30$35.94 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBAMAPOBN
P/E now vs peer median 27.7xmedian 33.5x 39.5xmedian 33.5x 70.6xmedian 33.5x
P/S now vs peer median 13.5xmedian 4.9x 1.9xmedian 4.9x 1.2xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 20.4xmedian 12.0x 7.8xmedian 12.0x —median 12.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 33.6xmedian 14.3x 7.2xmedian 14.3x —median 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 1.8x 1.6xmedian 1.8x 21.7xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.97 1,939median 0.97 -0.74median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBAMAPOBN
Revenue $5.74B $35.90B $76.56B
Gross profit – $31.30B –
Operating income – $5.48B –
Net income $3.07B $3.80B $3.71B
Free cash flow $2.31B $9.47B –
EPS (diluted) $1.74 $2.91 $0.53
Cash & equivalents $1.50B $26.82B $14.89B
Total debt $3.47B $13.73B $59.07B
Shares (diluted) 1.61B 610.22M 2.37B
Enterprise value $71.53B -$14.24B -$95.43B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBAMAPOBN
P/E 27.7x 39.5x 70.6x
P/FCF 33.6x 7.2x –
P/Operating cash flow 33.3x 7.2x –
P/S 13.5x 1.9x 1.2x
P/B 8.4x 1.6x 21.7x
P/Tangible book 8.7x 1.6x -2.7x
EV/EBITDA 20.4x 7.8x –
EV/EBIT 20.6x 10.1x –
EV/Revenue 13.9x 1.5x 0.7x
EV/FCF 34.4x 5.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow 34.1x 5.8x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1,939 -0.74

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBAMAPOBN
Revenue growth (1Y) 31.9% 41.2% -9.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 10.2% -4.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 36.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 38.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 32.8% -27.0% 28.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 15.9% 11.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 16.4% -47.4% 65.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 0.0% -95.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 73.4% 129.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 4.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 72.8% 129.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 4.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBAMAPOBN
Gross margin – 87.2% –
EBITDA margin 68.1% 19.7% –
Operating margin – 15.3% –
Pretax margin 64.7% 20.7% –
Net margin 48.9% 5.0% 1.6%
FCF margin 40.3% 26.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 40.7% 26.4% –
Return on equity 34.5% 10.6% 4.3%
Return on assets 16.1% 0.9% 0.7%
Return on invested capital 26.8% 5.8% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 2.5x –
Stock comp / revenue 2.4% 2.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBAMAPOBN
Debt / assets 17.3% 2.8% 2.8%
Debt / equity 0.4x 0.3x 3.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.5x -1.8x –
Debt / FCF 1.5x 1.4x –
Liabilities / assets 54.2% 91.6% 99.2%
Equity / assets 45.8% 8.4% 0.8%
Interest coverage 27.0x 18.2x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBAMAPOBN
Dividend yield 4.0% 1.8% 0.7%
Net buyback yield 1.1% 1.9% –
Shareholder yield 5.1% 3.7% 0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 33.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 13.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 11.7% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 8.3% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBAMAPOBN
Forward P/E 27.9xFY2026 13.1xFY2026 14.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.74FY2026 $9.02FY2026 $2.78FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +6.1%FY2026 +7.6%FY2026 +23.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +30.5% +23.9% +12.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.57BFY2026 $24.45BFY2026 $7.00BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +20.4%FY2026 -23.7%FY2026 +2.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.7% +4.4% +21.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBAMAPOBN
Held by institutions 93.3% 64.5% 66.5%
Institutions holding 620 1,168 931
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% -1.0% +1.2%
Institutions buying 293 643 408
Institutions selling 204 372 317
Buyers to sellers 1.44 1.73 1.29

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BAMAPOBN
BAM 1.00 0.70 0.85
APO 0.70 1.00 0.64
BN 0.85 0.64 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BAM, APO and BN?

Brookfield (BN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) $76.72B, Apollo Global Management (APO) $68.56B, Brookfield (BN) $87.88B.

Which stock is cheaper, BAM, APO and BN?

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 27.4x, Apollo Global Management (APO) 38.6x, Brookfield (BN) 69.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Apollo Global Management (APO) is cheapest (Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 27.9x, Apollo Global Management (APO) 13.1x, Brookfield (BN) 14.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Apollo Global Management (APO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) +31.9%, Apollo Global Management (APO) +41.2%, Brookfield (BN) -9.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) has the highest net margin (Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 48.9%, Apollo Global Management (APO) 5.0%, Brookfield (BN) 1.6%). On return on invested capital, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) leads (Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 26.8%, Apollo Global Management (APO) 5.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Apollo Global Management (APO) returned the most: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) -10.9%, Apollo Global Management (APO) -5.1%, Brookfield (BN) -15.2%. Over five years, Apollo Global Management (APO) compounded fastest (Apollo Global Management (APO) +9.0%/yr, Brookfield (BN) +3.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 0.00%, Apollo Global Management (APO) 0.02%, Brookfield (BN) 0.00%. Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) and Brookfield (BN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brookfield (BN) has been the steadiest (Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 30.3%, Apollo Global Management (APO) 36.3%, Brookfield (BN) 27.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BAM, APO and BN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Apollo Global Management (APO) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.