BAC vs TIGR vs XP Stock Comparison

Bank Of America, UP Fintech Holding and Xp Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (RY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BAC Bank Of America Corp /De/
$50.54 -10.8% 1M -3.9% 1Y
Market cap
$362.39B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$121.10B
Div. yield
0.03%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
5 wins
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Ltd
$4.09 -11.9% 1M -60.2% 1Y
Market cap
$735.38M
P/E
6.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$687.88M
Div. yield
–
Retail Brokerage Financial Services
3 wins
XP XP Inc.
$15.70 -23.5% 1M -10.6% 1Y
Market cap
$8.40B
P/E
8.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.59B
Div. yield
–
Retail Brokerage Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Bank Of America leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Bank Of America 5, UP Fintech Holding 3, Xp 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBACTIGRXPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $362.39B $735.38M $8.40B BAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.3x 6.1x 8.3x TIGR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.2x 7.7x 7.5x XP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.7% +41.4% +24.5% TIGR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 26.5% 17.4% 63.3% XP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.1% — -1.2% BAC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.6x — -73.9x XP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.9% -60.2% -10.6% BAC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.4%/yr -14.3%/yr -14.2%/yr BAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.9% 58.2% 86.4% BAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 72/100 52/100 TIGR

Percentile Scorecard

BACTIGRXP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBACTIGRXP
Valuation 96 #17 of 362 99 #2 of 97 69 #31 of 97
Growth 83 #39 of 221 82 #13 of 68 31 #47 of 68
Profitability 74 #52 of 200 67 #23 of 67 62 #26 of 67
Financial Health 24 #154 of 203 42 #57 of 97 14 #84 of 97
Shareholder Returns 77 #79 of 342 – 82 #8 of 40
Overall 71 72 52
  • BAC ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • TIGR ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets
  • XP ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBACTIGRXPSPY
1 month -10.8%-11.9%-23.5% -0.8%
3 months -18.7%-16.7%-6.2% +3.5%
6 months -4.0%-39.6%-19.8% +7.0%
Year to date -8.1%-57.2%-4.1% +12.2%
1 year -3.9%-60.2%-10.6% +13.0%
3 years +100.8%-11.1%-22.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +26.2%-3.8%-8.2% +23.1%
5 years +7.4%-53.8%-53.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year +1.4%-14.3%-14.2% +11.0%
10 years +199.6%—— +258.0%
10 years, per year +11.6%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBACTIGRXPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.9%58.2%86.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.6%64.6%105.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.721.681.73 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.18-1.03-0.12 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.0%-73.7%-70.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -22.0%-63.2%-51.8% -1.8%
52-week high $64.82$11.12$32.60 $779.14
52-week low $46.72$4.04$14.94 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBACTIGRXP
P/E now vs peer median 11.2xmedian 12.1x 6.0xmedian 29.4x 8.2xmedian 29.4x
P/S now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 3.4x 1.1xmedian 2.9x 5.1xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 5.0x 1.0xmedian 13.7x -85.5xmedian 13.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 11.0x —median 16.0x 3.3xmedian 16.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.2x 0.8xmedian 2.3x 1.7xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.40median 1.36 0.10median 0.52 0.52median 0.52

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBACTIGRXP
Revenue $121.10B $687.88M $1.59B
Gross profit – – $505.22M
Operating income – $163.65M -$769.94M
Net income $33.66B $112.10M $1.03B
Free cash flow $94.74B – $2.44B
EPS (diluted) $4.41 $0.64 $1.89
Cash & equivalents $229.75B $542.51M $1.54B
Total debt $399.84B – $224.00B
Shares (diluted) 7.29B 187.18M 531.92M
Enterprise value -$2.01T -$1.78B -$13.43B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBACTIGRXP
P/E 11.2x 6.0x 8.2x
P/FCF 3.7x – 3.3x
P/Operating cash flow 3.7x – 3.3x
P/S 2.9x 1.1x 5.1x
P/B 1.2x 0.8x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 1.2x 0.8x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA 1.4x 1.0x -85.5x
EV/EBIT 1.4x 1.0x -78.3x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 0.3x 37.9x
EV/FCF 1.8x – 24.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 1.8x – 24.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.40 0.10 0.52

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBACTIGRXP
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.7% 41.4% 24.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.4% 39.8% 11.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – -100.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -89.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 136.3% -100.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -58.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 20.5% -5.2% 27.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 4.2% 63.1% 87.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 27.5% -18.5% 20.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.0% 62.9% 15.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 517.8% – 30.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 28.5% – 24.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 517.8% – 30.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 28.5% – 24.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBACTIGRXP
Gross margin – – 31.8%
EBITDA margin 99.4% 24.9% -44.4%
Operating margin – 23.8% -48.4%
Pretax margin 36.2% 22.9% 68.1%
Net margin 26.5% 17.4% 63.3%
FCF margin 78.2% – 153.2%
Operating cash flow margin 78.2% – 155.8%
Return on equity 11.2% 13.0% 24.5%
Return on assets 1.0% 1.2% 1.5%
Return on invested capital 13.1% – -1.2%
Return on capital employed – 36.2% –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.1x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.8x – 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue 3.4% – 3.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBACTIGRXP
Debt / assets 11.4% – 72.2%
Debt / equity 1.3x – 11.9x
Net debt / EBITDA -1.6x – -73.9x
Debt / FCF 4.2x – 23.3x
Liabilities / assets 91.4% 90.9% 93.9%
Equity / assets 8.6% 9.1% 6.1%
Interest coverage 1.6x 2.3x -8.3x
Current ratio – 1.1x –
Quick ratio – 0.1x –
Cash ratio – 0.1x –
Altman Z-score – 0.32 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBACTIGRXP
Dividend yield 2.3% – 2.4%
Net buyback yield 6.6% – –
Shareholder yield 8.9% 0.0% 2.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 29.0% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 10.3% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 2.6% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 3.5% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBACTIGRXP
Forward P/E 11.2xFY2026 7.7xFY2026 7.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.52FY2026 $0.53FY2026 $2.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +18.6%FY2026 -47.5%FY2026 +17.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +19.9% +35.8% +11.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $127.79BFY2026 $591.32MFY2026 $3.94BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.0%FY2026 -3.4%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.4% +7.5% +5.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBACTIGRXP
Held by institutions 75.0% 33.7% 63.1%
Institutions holding 3,612 117 318
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.7% +6.6% +0.1%
Institutions buying 1,825 65 146
Institutions selling 1,342 36 132
Buyers to sellers 1.36 1.81 1.11

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BACTIGRXP
BAC 1.00 0.22 0.16
TIGR 0.22 1.00 0.22
XP 0.16 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BAC, TIGR and XP?

Bank Of America (BAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bank Of America (BAC) $362.39B, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) $735.38M, Xp (XP) $8.40B.

Which stock is cheaper, BAC, TIGR and XP?

UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bank Of America (BAC) 11.3x, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 6.1x, Xp (XP) 8.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Xp (XP) is cheapest (Bank Of America (BAC) 11.2x, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 7.7x, Xp (XP) 7.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bank Of America (BAC) +9.7%, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) +41.4%, Xp (XP) +24.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Xp (XP) has the highest net margin (Bank Of America (BAC) 26.5%, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 17.4%, Xp (XP) 63.3%). On return on invested capital, Bank Of America (BAC) leads (Bank Of America (BAC) 13.1%, Xp (XP) -1.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bank Of America (BAC) returned the most: Bank Of America (BAC) -3.9%, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) -60.2%, Xp (XP) -10.6%. Over five years, Bank Of America (BAC) compounded fastest (Bank Of America (BAC) +1.4%/yr, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) -14.3%/yr, Xp (XP) -14.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Bank Of America (BAC) 0.03%, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 0.00%, Xp (XP) 0.00%. UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) and Xp (XP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bank Of America (BAC) has been the steadiest (Bank Of America (BAC) 21.9%, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 58.2%, Xp (XP) 86.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BAC, TIGR and XP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bank Of America (BAC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.