BABB vs QSR vs YUM Stock Comparison

Bab, Restaurant Brands International and Yum Brands Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CAVA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BABB Bab, Inc.
$0.81 -4.7% 1M -18.2% 1Y
Market cap
$5.83M
P/E
8.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.54M
Div. yield
–
Quick-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
YUM Yum Brands Inc
$154.51 +12.2% 1M +11.0% 1Y
Market cap
$42.67B
P/E
19.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.72B
Div. yield
0.02%
Quick-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Yum Brands leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Yum Brands 6, Restaurant Brands International 3, Bab 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBABBQSRYUMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.83M $25.31B $42.67B YUM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.9x 16.9x 19.2x BABB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 18.4x 24.6x QSR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.7% +5.5% +10.3% YUM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 18.5% 15.3% 25.4% YUM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 13.7% 54.9% YUM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 4.1x 3.9x YUM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -18.2% +10.6% +11.0% YUM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.8%/yr +5.2%/yr +4.3%/yr QSR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.1% 25.0% 25.5% QSR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 86/100 58/100 53/100 BABB

Percentile Scorecard

BABBQSRYUM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBABBQSRYUM
Valuation 94 #4 of 50 45 #28 of 50 22 #39 of 50
Growth 65 #17 of 47 67 #16 of 47 63 #18 of 47
Profitability 91 #5 of 46 71 #14 of 46 98 #2 of 46
Financial Health 92 #5 of 51 32 #35 of 51 20 #41 of 51
Shareholder Returns 87 #5 of 32 74 #9 of 32 61 #13 of 32
Overall 86 58 53
  • BABB ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • QSR ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • YUM ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBABBQSRYUMSPY
1 month -4.7%+2.2%+12.2% +0.7%
3 months -2.4%-1.7%-1.6% +3.7%
6 months -10.0%-9.5%-3.2% +7.1%
Year to date -18.2%+7.0%+2.1% +12.8%
1 year -18.2%+10.6%+11.0% +11.9%
3 years +11.0%+10.0%+28.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +3.5%+3.2%+8.8% +22.8%
5 years +9.5%+29.0%+23.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year +1.8%+5.2%+4.3% +10.9%
10 years -1.2%+67.6%+150.7% +262.0%
10 years, per year -0.1%+5.3%+9.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBABBQSRYUMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.1%25.0%25.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.9%25.9%25.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.320.050.01 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.480.430.43 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -30.3%-27.5%-24.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.8%-10.6%-8.1% -1.2%
52-week high $1.01$81.67$168.16 $779.14
52-week low $0.79$65.69$135.80 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBABBQSRYUM
P/E now vs peer median 9.0xmedian 21.0x 17.0xmedian 21.0x 19.2xmedian 21.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 1.1x 2.6xmedian 1.1x 4.8xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 12.8x 12.7xmedian 12.8x 18.3xmedian 12.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.5xmedian 17.6x 16.1xmedian 17.6x 25.1xmedian 17.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 3.4x 4.6xmedian 3.4x -5.9xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.64median 0.93 0.93median 0.93 1.11median 0.93

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBABBQSRYUM
Revenue $3.54M $9.78B $8.72B
Gross profit – $5.30B $5.94B
Operating income $856.32K $2.64B $2.70B
Net income $654.28K $1.97B $2.22B
Free cash flow $690.05K $1.58B $1.68B
EPS (diluted) $0.09 $3.28 $8.00
Cash & equivalents $2.40M $974.00M $674.00M
Total debt – $13.27B $12.28B
Shares (diluted) 7.26M 457.00M 277.00M
Enterprise value -$3.05M $21.10B $39.56B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBABBQSRYUM
P/E 9.0x 17.0x 19.2x
P/FCF 8.5x 16.1x 25.1x
P/Operating cash flow 8.5x 13.7x 20.2x
P/S 1.7x 2.6x 4.8x
P/B 1.6x 4.6x -5.9x
P/Tangible book 1.8x -4.8x -5.3x
EV/EBITDA 4.0x 12.7x 18.3x
EV/EBIT 4.1x 14.3x 19.9x
EV/Revenue 1.0x 3.9x 6.2x
EV/FCF 5.0x 23.9x 32.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 5.0x 20.3x 25.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.64 0.93 1.11

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBABBQSRYUM
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.7% 5.5% 10.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.5% 12.4% 7.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 4.9% 6.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 5.8% 4.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 19.1% 19.1% 10.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.7% 11.0% 6.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 17.1% 53.7% 54.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.1% 14.0% 16.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 17.1% 62.7% 57.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 14.1% 18.3% 17.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 2.3% 13.6% 13.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 283.9% 11.5% 9.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 2.3% 12.9% 9.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 283.9% 8.9% 9.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBABBQSRYUM
Gross margin – 54.2% 68.1%
EBITDA margin 24.6% 30.4% 33.7%
Operating margin 24.2% 27.0% 31.0%
Pretax margin 25.7% 21.9% 25.2%
Net margin 18.5% 15.3% 25.4%
FCF margin 19.5% 16.2% 19.3%
Operating cash flow margin 19.5% 19.1% 23.9%
Return on equity 18.0% 36.1% –
Return on assets 13.0% 7.8% 26.2%
Return on invested capital – 13.7% 54.9%
Return on capital employed 20.1% 11.6% 65.1%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.4x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 0.9x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.5% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBABBQSRYUM
Debt / assets – 52.5% 141.4%
Debt / equity – 2.4x -1.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – 4.1x 3.9x
Debt / FCF – 8.4x 7.3x
Liabilities / assets 28.1% 78.1% 181.9%
Equity / assets 71.9% 21.9% -81.9%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 3.7x 1.0x 0.6x
Quick ratio 3.2x 0.7x 0.3x
Cash ratio 3.1x 0.4x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 1.31 1.64 2.29

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBABBQSRYUM
Dividend yield 4.9% 3.5% 1.9%
Net buyback yield – 1.5% 2.1%
Shareholder yield 4.9% 5.0% 4.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 36.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 48.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 4.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 6.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBABBQSRYUM
Forward P/E – 18.4xFY2026 24.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $3.96FY2026 $6.29FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +7.3%FY2026 +4.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +8.1% +16.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $10.27BFY2026 $9.06BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +8.9%FY2026 +10.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -10.0% -4.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBABBQSRYUM
Held by institutions – 92.2% 88.7%
Institutions holding – 576 1,436
Change in shares held, QoQ – +6.5% +3.6%
Institutions buying – 319 627
Institutions selling – 166 488
Buyers to sellers – 1.92 1.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BABBQSRYUM
BABB 1.00 0.05 0.01
QSR 0.05 1.00 0.37
YUM 0.01 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BABB, QSR and YUM?

Yum Brands (YUM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bab (BABB) $5.83M, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) $25.31B, Yum Brands (YUM) $42.67B.

Which stock is cheaper, BABB, QSR and YUM?

Bab (BABB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bab (BABB) 8.9x, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) 16.9x, Yum Brands (YUM) 19.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) is cheapest (Restaurant Brands International (QSR) 18.4x, Yum Brands (YUM) 24.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Yum Brands (YUM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bab (BABB) +7.7%, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) +5.5%, Yum Brands (YUM) +10.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Yum Brands (YUM) has the highest net margin (Bab (BABB) 18.5%, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) 15.3%, Yum Brands (YUM) 25.4%). On return on invested capital, Yum Brands (YUM) leads (Restaurant Brands International (QSR) 13.7%, Yum Brands (YUM) 54.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Yum Brands (YUM) returned the most: Bab (BABB) -18.2%, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) +10.6%, Yum Brands (YUM) +11.0%. Over five years, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) compounded fastest (Bab (BABB) +1.8%/yr, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) +5.2%/yr, Yum Brands (YUM) +4.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Bab (BABB) 0.00%, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) 0.00%, Yum Brands (YUM) 0.02%. Bab (BABB) and Restaurant Brands International (QSR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) has been the steadiest (Bab (BABB) 38.1%, Restaurant Brands International (QSR) 25.0%, Yum Brands (YUM) 25.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BABB, QSR and YUM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Yum Brands (YUM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.