BABA vs GRAB vs CART Stock Comparison

Alibaba Group Holding, Grab Holdings and Maplebear Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (PDD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
$99.51 -7.6% 1M -44.7% 1Y
Market cap
$231.12B
P/E
21.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$150.46B
Div. yield
1.06%
Digital Marketplaces Technology
4 wins
GRAB Grab Holdings Ltd
$2.76 -11.5% 1M -54.4% 1Y
Market cap
$10.96B
P/E
19.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.73B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
4 wins
CART Maplebear Inc.
$57.11 +31.3% 1M +51.1% 1Y
Market cap
$13.31B
P/E
27.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.15B
Div. yield
–
Digital Marketplaces Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Alibaba Group Holding leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Alibaba Group Holding 4, Grab Holdings 4, Maplebear 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBABAGRABCARTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $231.12B $10.96B $13.31B BABA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 21.9x 19.8x 27.8x GRAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.2x 17.2x 23.2x BABA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.1% +21.5% +14.2% GRAB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.0% 15.3% — GRAB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.4% 1.5% — BABA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -6.5x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.06% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -44.7% -54.4% +51.1% CART
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -9.6%/yr -26.2%/yr — BABA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.2% 38.5% 44.1% GRAB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 55/100 66/100 CART

Percentile Scorecard

BABAGRABCART

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBABAGRABCART
Valuation 67 #55 of 166 46 #90 of 166 39 #101 of 166
Growth 17 #127 of 153 79 #33 of 153 57 #66 of 153
Profitability 55 #70 of 153 45 #84 of 153 86 #22 of 153
Financial Health 59 #74 of 179 51 #89 of 179 82 #34 of 179
Shareholder Returns 30 #64 of 91 – –
Overall 46 55 66
  • BABA ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • GRAB ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • CART ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBABAGRABCARTSPY
1 month -7.6%-11.5%+31.3% +0.7%
3 months -14.4%-18.8%+27.6% +3.7%
6 months -24.5%-27.7%+34.9% +7.1%
Year to date -32.1%-44.7%+27.0% +12.8%
1 year -44.7%-54.4%+51.1% +11.9%
3 years +19.7%-11.0%+121.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year +6.2%-3.8%+30.3% +22.8%
5 years -39.7%-78.1%— +67.6%
5 years, per year -9.6%-26.2%— +10.9%
10 years -2.4%—— +262.0%
10 years, per year -0.2%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBABAGRABCARTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.2%38.5%44.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 35.9%39.5%43.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.121.390.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.11-1.411.16 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.9%-86.5%-38.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.7%-54.5%-6.2% -1.2%
52-week high $179.97$6.07$60.88 $779.14
52-week low $94.81$2.71$32.93 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBABAGRABCART
P/E now vs peer median 21.9xmedian 16.7x 19.8xmedian 16.7x 27.8xmedian 16.7x
P/S now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.4x 2.9xmedian 1.4x 3.2xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.7x 27.1xmedian 12.7x —median 12.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.0xmedian 10.5x 56.8xmedian 10.5x 8.6xmedian 10.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.7x 1.6xmedian 1.7x 5.2xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median -15.23median 0.39 —median 0.39 0.99median 0.39

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBABAGRABCART
Revenue $150.46B $3.73B $4.15B
Gross profit $57.45B $1.63B $2.99B
Operating income $4.39B $120.00M $596.00M
Net income $10.08B $525.00M $483.00M
Free cash flow $33.19B $193.00M –
R&D $10.68B $417.00M $731.00M
EPS (diluted) $4.38 $0.14 $1.94
Cash & equivalents $21.06B $2.86B $830.00M
Total debt $83.76B $2.99B –
Shares (diluted) 2.40B 4.21B 248.94M
Enterprise value $53.19B -$3.73B $13.31B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBABAGRABCART
P/E 21.9x 19.8x 27.8x
P/FCF 7.0x 56.8x 8.6x
P/Operating cash flow 20.4x 84.3x 10.5x
P/S 1.5x 2.9x 3.2x
P/B 1.4x 1.6x 5.2x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 1.6x 5.3x
EV/EBITDA – 27.1x –
EV/EBIT 47.6x 73.5x –
EV/Revenue 1.4x 2.4x 3.2x
EV/FCF 6.3x 45.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow 18.5x 67.9x 10.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -15.23 – 0.99

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBABAGRABCART
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.1% 21.5% 14.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.6% 23.6% 11.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.2% 23.6% 10.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 6.5% 69.9% 10.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -77.5% 340.0% 7.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -35.9% 28.7% 31.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -50.0% 837.5% -6.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -3.6% 35.1% 33.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -47.9% 82.0% 5.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -1.4% – 28.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -45.8% -82.1% 34.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -27.8% 34.4% 46.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -8.5% -76.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.6% 40.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBABAGRABCART
Gross margin 38.2% 43.6% –
EBITDA margin – 8.7% –
Operating margin 2.9% 3.2% –
Pretax margin 9.7% 13.9% –
Net margin 7.0% 15.3% –
FCF margin 22.1% 5.2% –
Operating cash flow margin 7.5% 3.5% 30.6%
Return on equity 6.2% 7.9% 19.8%
Return on assets 3.6% 4.2% 13.6%
Return on invested capital 2.4% 1.5% –
Return on capital employed 2.1% 1.7% –
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.3x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 0.2x 2.6x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 6.4% 10.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBABAGRABCART
Debt / assets 7.5% 15.1% –
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -6.5x –
Debt / FCF 0.6x 10.5x –
Liabilities / assets 43.6% 49.7% 28.2%
Equity / assets 56.4% 50.3% 71.8%
Interest coverage 3.2x 1.1x –
Current ratio 1.4x 1.5x 2.3x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.8x –
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.8x –
Altman Z-score 2.29 -0.25 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBABAGRABCART
Dividend yield 1.1% – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 1.1% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBABAGRABCART
Forward P/E 14.2xFY2026 17.2xFY2026 23.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $7.02FY2026 $0.16FY2026 $2.46FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +80.9%FY2026 +166.7%FY2026 +53.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +22.8% +12.5% +14.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $174.00BFY2026 $4.07BFY2026 $4.00BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +17.3%FY2026 +20.9%FY2026 +7.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +14.7% +33.7% +25.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBABAGRABCART
Held by institutions 10.1% 75.6% 82.5%
Institutions holding 1,219 484 500
Change in shares held, QoQ -5.4% +0.9% +3.5%
Institutions buying 556 231 246
Institutions selling 421 168 179
Buyers to sellers 1.32 1.38 1.37

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BABAGRABCART
BABA 1.00 0.27 0.03
GRAB 0.27 1.00 0.13
CART 0.03 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BABA, GRAB and CART?

Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) $231.12B, Grab Holdings (GRAB) $10.96B, Maplebear (CART) $13.31B.

Which stock is cheaper, BABA, GRAB and CART?

Grab Holdings (GRAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) 21.9x, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 19.8x, Maplebear (CART) 27.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) is cheapest (Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) 14.2x, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 17.2x, Maplebear (CART) 23.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Grab Holdings (GRAB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) +8.1%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) +21.5%, Maplebear (CART) +14.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Grab Holdings (GRAB) has the highest net margin (Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) 7.0%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 15.3%). On return on invested capital, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) leads (Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) 2.4%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 1.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Maplebear (CART) returned the most: Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) -44.7%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) -54.4%, Maplebear (CART) +51.1%. Over five years, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) compounded fastest (Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) -9.6%/yr, Grab Holdings (GRAB) -26.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) 1.06%. Grab Holdings (GRAB) and Maplebear (CART) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grab Holdings (GRAB) has been the steadiest (Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) 40.2%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 38.5%, Maplebear (CART) 44.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BABA, GRAB and CART?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.