BA vs LMT vs TDG Stock Comparison

Boeing, Lockheed Martin and TransDigm Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (RTX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BA Boeing Co
$188.29 -5.7% 1M -13.5% 1Y
Market cap
$148.46B
P/E
71.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$94.00B
Div. yield
–
Commercial Aerospace Industrials
2 wins
LMT Lockheed Martin Corp
$604.47 +15.3% 1M +23.9% 1Y
Market cap
$146.40B
P/E
22.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$79.12B
Div. yield
0.02%
Defense Industrials
5 wins
TDG TransDigm Group INC
$1,105.84 +0.1% 1M -18.1% 1Y
Market cap
$64.86B
P/E
33.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.01B
Div. yield
–
Commercial Aerospace Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Lockheed Martin leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Lockheed Martin 5, TransDigm 4, Boeing 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBALMTTDGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $148.46B $146.40B $64.86B BA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 71.0x 22.5x 33.9x LMT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 20.6x 25.1x LMT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.8% +7.9% +16.6% BA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.2% 8.2% 19.1% TDG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.7% 26.5% 15.5% LMT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.8x 1.3x 6.1x LMT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -13.5% +23.9% -18.1% LMT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.4%/yr +10.0%/yr +11.3%/yr TDG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 34.4% 29.5% 27.1% TDG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 60/100 66/100 TDG

Percentile Scorecard

BALMTTDG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBALMTTDG
Valuation 44 #56 of 100 70 #31 of 100 53 #48 of 100
Growth 81 #19 of 97 62 #38 of 97 67 #33 of 97
Profitability 54 #45 of 96 88 #12 of 96 96 #5 of 96
Financial Health 11 #94 of 106 41 #63 of 106 16 #89 of 106
Shareholder Returns – 41 #39 of 65 97 #3 of 65
Overall 48 60 66
  • BA ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • LMT ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • TDG ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBALMTTDGSPY
1 month -5.7%+15.3%+0.1% -1.0%
3 months -10.2%+3.7%-10.6% +2.9%
6 months -19.0%+17.7%-3.7% +6.4%
Year to date -13.3%+25.0%-16.8% +11.4%
1 year -13.5%+23.9%-18.1% +13.1%
3 years +3.3%+37.1%+33.1% +79.4%
3 years, per year +1.1%+11.1%+10.0% +21.5%
5 years -11.6%+61.4%+70.6% +67.7%
5 years, per year -2.4%+10.0%+11.3% +10.9%
10 years +38.8%+162.2%+320.7% +255.2%
10 years, per year +3.3%+10.1%+15.5% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureBALMTTDGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 34.4%29.5%27.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.2%26.4%28.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.23-0.100.74 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.390.81-0.67 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.3%-33.2%-33.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.3%-10.7%-23.7% -2.5%
52-week high $252.15$676.70$1,450.00 $779.14
52-week low $179.12$439.19$1,076.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBALMTTDG
P/E now vs peer median 71.2xmedian 26.2x 21.4xmedian 26.2x 33.2xmedian 26.2x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 2.9x 1.8xmedian 2.9x 6.1xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 25.7xmedian 14.7x 14.0xmedian 14.7x 18.1xmedian 14.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -708.7xmedian 24.9x 16.7xmedian 24.9x 31.7xmedian 24.9x
P/B now vs peer median 24.3xmedian 2.4x 13.9xmedian 2.4x -6.2xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 2.15median 0.92 61.37median 0.92 1.57median 0.92

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBALMTTDG
Revenue $94.00B $79.12B $10.01B
Gross profit $4.40B $9.28B $5.96B
Operating income $4.60B $9.32B $4.61B
Net income $2.43B $6.51B $2.13B
Free cash flow -$210.00M $8.38B $1.93B
R&D $3.69B – –
EPS (diluted) $2.64 $28.13 $33.29
Cash & equivalents $7.24B $5.96B $2.77B
Total debt $45.90B $83.92B $33.49B
Shares (diluted) 790.80M 231.50M 57.40M
Enterprise value $55.15B $130.63B $52.87B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBALMTTDG
P/E 71.2x 21.4x 33.2x
P/FCF -708.7x 16.7x 31.7x
P/Operating cash flow 40.9x 13.8x 27.8x
P/S 1.6x 1.8x 6.1x
P/B 24.3x 13.9x -6.2x
P/Tangible book 32.5x 16.8x -4.2x
EV/EBITDA 25.7x 14.0x 18.1x
EV/EBIT 38.0x 16.5x 19.9x
EV/Revenue 1.9x 1.9x 9.2x
EV/FCF -831.9x 18.4x 47.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 48.0x 15.2x 41.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.15 61.37 1.57

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBALMTTDG
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.8% 7.9% 16.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.5% 5.3% 17.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 1,902% 55.0% 16.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -3.6% 3.0% 17.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 149.8% 52.8% 16.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 49.8% 3.1% 19.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 122.8% 55.1% 10.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 36.4% -2.2% 22.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 118.3% 55.9% 10.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 33.1% 0.3% 21.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 158.8% 59.0% 4.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -26.6% 10.6% 22.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 97.5% 82.5% 1.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -26.6% 13.0% 22.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBALMTTDG
Gross margin 4.7% 11.7% 59.6%
EBITDA margin 7.2% 13.9% 50.7%
Operating margin 4.9% 11.8% 46.0%
Pretax margin 3.0% 9.7% 27.4%
Net margin 2.2% 8.2% 19.1%
FCF margin -0.2% 10.6% 19.3%
Operating cash flow margin 3.9% 12.8% 22.0%
Return on equity 40.4% 69.2% –
Return on assets 1.5% 10.3% 8.2%
Return on invested capital 7.7% 26.5% 15.5%
Return on capital employed 8.2% 23.9% 19.6%
Asset turnover 0.6x 1.2x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 1.6x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 0.5% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBALMTTDG
Debt / assets 27.7% 31.8% 125.2%
Debt / equity 7.5x 2.0x -3.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.8x 1.3x 6.1x
Debt / FCF -218.6x 2.4x 17.4x
Liabilities / assets 96.3% 84.4% 136.7%
Equity / assets 3.7% 15.6% -36.7%
Interest coverage 1.8x 8.6x 2.5x
Current ratio 1.1x 1.3x 3.0x
Quick ratio 0.3x 1.1x 1.9x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.2x 1.1x
Altman Z-score 1.47 3.73 1.70

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBALMTTDG
Dividend yield – 2.3% –
Net buyback yield – 0.5% 2.7%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 2.8% 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 49.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 38.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 1.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 1.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBALMTTDG
Forward P/E – 20.6xFY2026 25.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-1.03FY2026 $29.31FY2026 $44.02FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -186.6%FY2026 +36.4%FY2026 +17.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +7.0% +7.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $91.39BFY2026 $85.60BFY2026 $10.01BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.2%FY2026 +14.1%FY2026 +13.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.3% +3.0% +24.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBALMTTDG
Held by institutions 75.6% 75.5% 93.2%
Institutions holding 2,626 2,779 1,140
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.3% +0.4% +1.2%
Institutions buying 1,327 1,336 584
Institutions selling 843 1,026 367
Buyers to sellers 1.57 1.30 1.59

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BALMTTDG
BA 1.00 0.16 0.38
LMT 0.16 1.00 0.27
TDG 0.38 0.27 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BA, LMT and TDG?

Boeing (BA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Boeing (BA) $148.46B, Lockheed Martin (LMT) $146.40B, TransDigm (TDG) $64.86B.

Which stock is cheaper, BA, LMT and TDG?

Lockheed Martin (LMT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Boeing (BA) 71.0x, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 22.5x, TransDigm (TDG) 33.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Lockheed Martin (LMT) is cheapest (Lockheed Martin (LMT) 20.6x, TransDigm (TDG) 25.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Boeing (BA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Boeing (BA) +24.8%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) +7.9%, TransDigm (TDG) +16.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

TransDigm (TDG) has the highest net margin (Boeing (BA) 2.2%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 8.2%, TransDigm (TDG) 19.1%). On return on invested capital, Lockheed Martin (LMT) leads (Boeing (BA) 7.7%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 26.5%, TransDigm (TDG) 15.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lockheed Martin (LMT) returned the most: Boeing (BA) -13.5%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) +23.9%, TransDigm (TDG) -18.1%. Over five years, TransDigm (TDG) compounded fastest (Boeing (BA) -2.4%/yr, Lockheed Martin (LMT) +10.0%/yr, TransDigm (TDG) +11.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Boeing (BA) 0.00%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 0.02%, TransDigm (TDG) 0.00%. Boeing (BA) and TransDigm (TDG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, TransDigm (TDG) has been the steadiest (Boeing (BA) 34.4%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 29.5%, TransDigm (TDG) 27.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BA, LMT and TDG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lockheed Martin (LMT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.