AZZ vs LXFR vs NNDM Stock Comparison

Azz, Luxfer Holdings and Nano Dimension Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ACA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AZZ Azz Inc
$122.24 -13.8% 1M +18.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.79B
P/E
22.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.75B
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials
7 wins
LXFR Luxfer Holdings Plc
$17.31 +0.4% 1M +36.8% 1Y
Market cap
$463.21M
P/E
74.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$355.20M
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials
3 wins
NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd.
$1.25 -20.4% 1M -20.9% 1Y
Market cap
$275.37M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$125.92M
Div. yield
–
3D Printing Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Azz leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Azz 7, Luxfer Holdings 3, Nano Dimension 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAZZLXFRNNDMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.79B $463.21M $275.37M AZZ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 22.6x 74.7x -1.8x AZZ
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.6x 17.5x — AZZ
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.5% -11.8% +54.1% NNDM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.6% 1.7% -118.4% AZZ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 11.4% 5.2% -30.1% AZZ
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.2x 1.2x 2.3x LXFR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +18.0% +36.8% -20.9% LXFR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.5%/yr -4.7%/yr -26.4%/yr AZZ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.2% 32.4% 52.6% LXFR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 51/100 47/100 AZZ

Percentile Scorecard

AZZLXFRNNDM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAZZLXFRNNDM
Valuation 80 #41 of 204 53 #96 of 204 39 #125 of 204
Growth 62 #74 of 191 18 #156 of 191 53 #91 of 191
Profitability 72 #54 of 189 37 #120 of 189 7 #175 of 189
Financial Health 55 #101 of 221 67 #73 of 221 89 #26 of 221
Shareholder Returns 22 #124 of 159 79 #35 of 159 –
Overall 58 51 47
  • AZZ ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • LXFR ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • NNDM ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAZZLXFRNNDMSPY
1 month -13.8%+0.4%-20.4% -5.9%
3 months -19.0%+1.3%-20.4% -4.6%
6 months -15.2%+11.5%-32.4% +0.2%
Year to date +14.1%+27.9%-18.8% +7.5%
1 year +18.0%+36.8%-20.9% +8.2%
3 years +155.7%+101.3%-50.6% +68.3%
3 years, per year +36.8%+26.3%-21.0% +19.0%
5 years +114.1%-21.4%-78.4% +56.5%
5 years, per year +16.5%-4.7%-26.4% +9.4%
10 years +132.2%—-98.1% +251.5%
10 years, per year +8.8%—-32.8% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureAZZLXFRNNDMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.2%32.4%52.6% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.9%37.9%58.2% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.170.801.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.541.14-0.40 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.8%-67.3%-79.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -23.7%-9.3%-41.6% -5.9%
52-week high $160.17$19.08$2.14 $779.14
52-week low $97.64$11.51$1.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAZZLXFRNNDM
P/E now vs peer median 21.9xmedian 23.4x 74.7xmedian 23.4x -1.8xmedian 23.4x
P/S now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 1.7x 1.3xmedian 1.7x 2.0xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.8xmedian 13.4x 15.6xmedian 13.4x 0.4xmedian 13.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.1xmedian 21.9x 24.5xmedian 21.9x -3.7xmedian 21.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 2.1x 2.1xmedian 2.1x 0.6xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.25median 1.02 56.62median 1.02 0.01median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAZZLXFRNNDM
Revenue $1.75B $355.20M $125.92M
Gross profit $423.83M $89.00M $53.18M
Operating income $287.42M $22.40M -$147.72M
Net income $167.46M $6.20M -$149.06M
Free cash flow $214.45M $18.90M -$67.80M
R&D – $5.60M $26.37M
EPS (diluted) $5.56 $0.23 $-0.71
Cash & equivalents $1.95M $19.90M $314.85M
Total debt $468.47M $57.70M $18.27M
Shares (diluted) 30.12M 27.30M 209.41M
Enterprise value $3.79B $408.71M -$950.81M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAZZLXFRNNDM
P/E 21.9x 74.7x -1.8x
P/FCF 17.1x 24.5x -3.7x
P/Operating cash flow 12.5x 15.4x -3.7x
P/S 2.1x 1.3x 2.0x
P/B 2.6x 2.1x 0.6x
P/Tangible book 3.7x 2.2x 0.6x
EV/EBITDA 10.8x 15.6x 0.4x
EV/EBIT 14.3x 22.4x 0.3x
EV/Revenue 2.4x 1.4x -0.4x
EV/FCF 19.2x 26.5x 0.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 14.1x 16.7x 0.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.25 56.62 0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAZZLXFRNNDM
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.5% -11.8% 54.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.2% -5.9% 32.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.0% -3.1% 105.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.9% 2.9% 26.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 21.3% 0.0% -2.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 11.4% -4.2% -32.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -46.7% -56.6% -96.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 99.0% 1.7% -1.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -46.5% -56.9% 40.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 87.1% 1.3% -265.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -42.0% -31.4% -7.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 20.3% 0.7% 13.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -47.3% -47.6% -1.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 35.3% 0.2% 8.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAZZLXFRNNDM
Gross margin 24.3% 25.1% 42.2%
EBITDA margin 21.8% 9.1% -104.5%
Operating margin 16.5% 6.3% -117.3%
Pretax margin 12.9% 5.2% -124.1%
Net margin 9.6% 1.7% -118.4%
FCF margin 12.3% 5.3% -53.8%
Operating cash flow margin 16.7% 8.4% -53.1%
Return on equity 12.0% 2.8% -32.6%
Return on assets 7.3% 1.6% -28.0%
Return on invested capital 11.4% 5.2% -30.1%
Return on capital employed 14.1% 7.3% -31.4%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.9x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 4.8x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 1.1% 5.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAZZLXFRNNDM
Debt / assets 20.0% 15.1% 3.6%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.3x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.2x 1.2x 2.3x
Debt / FCF 2.2x 3.1x -0.3x
Liabilities / assets 39.5% 42.1% 14.8%
Equity / assets 60.5% 57.9% 85.2%
Interest coverage 6.3x 6.6x -1,078x
Current ratio 1.8x 2.5x 7.5x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.1x 5.5x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.3x 5.1x
Altman Z-score 4.22 3.57 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAZZLXFRNNDM
Dividend yield 0.7% 2.3% –
Net buyback yield – 0.6% –
Shareholder yield 0.7% 2.8% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAZZLXFRNNDM
Forward P/E 16.6xFY2026 17.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $7.37FY2026 $0.99FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +19.1%FY2026 -10.8%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +12.1% +41.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.97BFY2026 $386.72MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +19.4%FY2026 +4.2%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -8.1% +2.6% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAZZLXFRNNDM
Held by institutions 94.6% 91.6% 31.9%
Institutions holding 364 138 108
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.1% -1.6% +13.9%
Institutions buying 196 76 51
Institutions selling 119 42 25
Buyers to sellers 1.65 1.81 2.04

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AZZLXFRNNDM
AZZ 1.00 0.35 0.20
LXFR 0.35 1.00 0.23
NNDM 0.20 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AZZ, LXFR and NNDM?

Azz (AZZ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Azz (AZZ) $3.79B, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) $463.21M, Nano Dimension (NNDM) $275.37M.

Which stock is cheaper, AZZ, LXFR and NNDM?

Azz (AZZ) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Azz (AZZ) 22.6x, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 74.7x, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -1.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Azz (AZZ) is cheapest (Azz (AZZ) 16.6x, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 17.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Nano Dimension (NNDM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Azz (AZZ) +9.5%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) -11.8%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) +54.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Azz (AZZ) has the highest net margin (Azz (AZZ) 9.6%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 1.7%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -118.4%). On return on invested capital, Azz (AZZ) leads (Azz (AZZ) 11.4%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 5.2%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -30.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) returned the most: Azz (AZZ) +18.0%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) +36.8%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -20.9%. Over five years, Azz (AZZ) compounded fastest (Azz (AZZ) +16.5%/yr, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) -4.7%/yr, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -26.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) has been the steadiest (Azz (AZZ) 33.2%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 32.4%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) 52.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AZZ, LXFR and NNDM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Azz (AZZ) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.