AUSI vs VRT vs APH Stock Comparison

Aura Systems, Vertiv Holdings and Amphenol Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AUSI Aura Systems Inc
$0.19 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$28.11M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$127.00K
Div. yield
–
Electrical Equipment Industrials
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co
$199.91 -21.1% 1M +7.4% 1Y
Market cap
$80.19B
P/E
46.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.48B
Div. yield
–
Electrical Equipment Industrials
5 wins
APH Amphenol Corp /De/
$75.28 -10.5% 1M -43.7% 1Y
Market cap
$193.19B
P/E
37.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$29.01B
Div. yield
0.01%
Electrical Equipment Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Amphenol leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Amphenol 6, Vertiv Holdings 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAUSIVRTAPHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $28.11M $80.19B $193.19B APH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -6.0x 46.3x 37.6x APH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 28.9x 28.8x APH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -31.4% +26.2% +54.2% APH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -3,697.6% 15.1% 17.7% APH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 24.0% 16.5% VRT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.1x 1.5x VRT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months 0.0% +7.4% -43.7% VRT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -17.6%/yr +52.0%/yr +14.7%/yr VRT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 211.3% 66.0% 85.6% VRT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 15/100 60/100 64/100 APH

Percentile Scorecard

AUSIVRTAPH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAUSIVRTAPH
Valuation 1 #202 of 203 30 #142 of 203 19 #164 of 203
Growth 47 #100 of 187 100 #2 of 187 97 #7 of 187
Profitability 11 #165 of 185 99 #3 of 185 98 #5 of 185
Financial Health 1 #217 of 219 56 #96 of 219 42 #127 of 219
Shareholder Returns – 16 #129 of 153 66 #53 of 153
Overall 15 60 64
  • AUSI ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • VRT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • APH ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAUSIVRTAPHSPY
1 month 0.0%-21.1%-10.5% -0.8%
3 months +11.8%-30.4%-49.6% +3.5%
6 months +72.7%-38.0%-49.4% +7.0%
Year to date +171.4%+23.4%-44.3% +12.2%
1 year 0.0%+7.4%-43.7% +13.0%
3 years +18.8%+448.9%+89.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year +5.9%+76.5%+23.8% +23.1%
5 years -62.0%+709.7%+98.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year -17.6%+52.0%+14.7% +11.0%
10 years ——+359.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——+16.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAUSIVRTAPHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 211.3%66.0%85.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 329.3%67.0%114.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.212.891.70 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.000.11-0.51 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -90.9%-70.2%-58.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.6%-46.9%-57.3% -1.8%
52-week high $0.22$376.23$176.32 $779.14
52-week low $0.07$149.83$73.07 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAUSIVRTAPH
P/E now vs peer median -6.0xmedian 26.0x 44.4xmedian 26.0x 36.0xmedian 26.0x
P/S now vs peer median 221.4xmedian 1.9x 6.7xmedian 1.9x 6.4xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.0x 29.9xmedian 14.0x 21.8xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -9.1xmedian 21.4x 26.3xmedian 21.4x 39.4xmedian 21.4x
P/B now vs peer median -0.6xmedian 2.2x 16.2xmedian 2.2x 11.9xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.57median 1.26 0.40median 1.26 0.96median 1.26

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAUSIVRTAPH
Revenue $127.00K $11.48B $29.01B
Gross profit $116.00K $4.37B $11.17B
Operating income -$3.73M $2.17B $7.84B
Net income -$4.70M $1.73B $5.19B
Free cash flow – $2.93B $4.71B
R&D $1.60M – –
EPS (diluted) $-0.03 $4.41 $1.99
Cash & equivalents $13.00K $2.81B $4.73B
Total debt $57.21M $2.94B $18.81B
Shares (diluted) 147.97M 392.75M 2.58B
Enterprise value $27.96M $70.81B $187.77B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAUSIVRTAPH
P/E -6.0x 44.4x 36.0x
P/FCF -9.1x 26.3x 39.4x
P/Operating cash flow – 22.9x 31.6x
P/S 221.4x 6.7x 6.4x
P/B -0.6x 16.2x 11.9x
P/Tangible book -0.6x 26.0x 18.0x
EV/EBITDA – 29.9x 21.8x
EV/EBIT -11.4x 35.3x 25.4x
EV/Revenue 335.5x 6.7x 6.9x
EV/FCF – 26.2x 42.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – 22.9x 33.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.57 0.40 0.96

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAUSIVRTAPH
Revenue growth (1Y) -31.4% 26.2% 54.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 25.0% 21.6% 32.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -27.5% 36.0% 70.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 48.9% 29.1% 40.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -14.7% 39.2% 86.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -6.3% 55.5% 45.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 33.8% 113.2% 61.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -2.6% 112.2% 39.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 44.8% 111.6% 59.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 10.5% 110.3% 37.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 135.1% 57.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 91.1% 35.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 134.8% 67.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 100.2% 34.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAUSIVRTAPH
Gross margin 91.3% 38.0% 38.5%
EBITDA margin – 22.3% 31.5%
Operating margin -2,934% 18.9% 27.0%
Pretax margin -4,554% 18.4% 25.2%
Net margin -3,698% 15.1% 17.7%
FCF margin – 25.5% 16.2%
Operating cash flow margin – 29.2% 20.2%
Return on equity – 38.5% 34.9%
Return on assets -402.7% 11.8% 11.9%
Return on invested capital – 24.0% 16.5%
Return on capital employed – 29.4% 23.0%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.8x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.9x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAUSIVRTAPH
Debt / assets 961.3% 18.5% 42.0%
Debt / equity -0.3x 0.6x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.1x 1.5x
Debt / FCF – 1.0x 4.0x
Liabilities / assets 3,433% 70.1% 65.2%
Equity / assets -3,333% 29.9% 34.8%
Interest coverage -1.8x 41.4x 12.4x
Current ratio 0.0x 1.4x 1.9x
Quick ratio 0.0x 0.9x 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.4x 0.6x
Altman Z-score -526.80 5.69 5.63

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAUSIVRTAPH
Dividend yield – 0.1% 0.7%
Net buyback yield – -0.1% 0.2%
Shareholder yield – 0.0% 0.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 19.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 21.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 39.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 27.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAUSIVRTAPH
Forward P/E – 28.9xFY2026 28.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $6.91FY2026 $2.61FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +64.5%FY2026 +56.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +40.2% +35.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $14.66BFY2026 $33.34BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +43.3%FY2026 +44.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +20.2% +33.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAUSIVRTAPH
Held by institutions – 81.7% 96.0%
Institutions holding – 2,037 2,330
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.0% +2.6%
Institutions buying – 1,170 1,360
Institutions selling – 690 773
Buyers to sellers – 1.70 1.76

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AUSIVRTAPH
AUSI 1.00 -0.01 0.01
VRT -0.01 1.00 0.25
APH 0.01 0.25 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AUSI, VRT and APH?

Amphenol (APH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Aura Systems (AUSI) $28.11M, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) $80.19B, Amphenol (APH) $193.19B.

Which stock is cheaper, AUSI, VRT and APH?

Amphenol (APH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Aura Systems (AUSI) -6.0x, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) 46.3x, Amphenol (APH) 37.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Amphenol (APH) is cheapest (Vertiv Holdings (VRT) 28.9x, Amphenol (APH) 28.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Amphenol (APH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Aura Systems (AUSI) -31.4%, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) +26.2%, Amphenol (APH) +54.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Amphenol (APH) has the highest net margin (Aura Systems (AUSI) -3,697.6%, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) 15.1%, Amphenol (APH) 17.7%). On return on invested capital, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) leads (Vertiv Holdings (VRT) 24.0%, Amphenol (APH) 16.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Vertiv Holdings (VRT) returned the most: Aura Systems (AUSI) 0.0%, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) +7.4%, Amphenol (APH) -43.7%. Over five years, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) compounded fastest (Aura Systems (AUSI) -17.6%/yr, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) +52.0%/yr, Amphenol (APH) +14.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Vertiv Holdings (VRT) 0.00%, Amphenol (APH) 0.01%. Aura Systems (AUSI) and Vertiv Holdings (VRT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) has been the steadiest (Aura Systems (AUSI) 211.3%, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) 66.0%, Amphenol (APH) 85.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AUSI, VRT and APH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Amphenol (APH) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.