AUSI vs ETN vs HUBB Stock Comparison

Aura Systems, Eaton and Hubbell Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AUSI Aura Systems Inc
$0.11 -45.0% 1M -42.1% 1Y
Market cap
$29.49M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$127.00K
Div. yield
–
Electrical Equipment Industrials
ETN Eaton Corp plc
$393.05 -8.9% 1M +4.5% 1Y
Market cap
$152.20B
P/E
39.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$30.03B
Div. yield
–
Electrical Equipment Industrials
3 wins
HUBB Hubbell Inc
$437.29 -6.1% 1M -4.0% 1Y
Market cap
$23.03B
P/E
25.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.59B
Div. yield
–
Electrical Equipment Industrials
8 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Hubbell leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Hubbell 8, Eaton 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAUSIETNHUBBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $29.49M $152.20B $23.03B ETN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -6.3x 39.7x 25.3x HUBB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 28.3x 21.8x HUBB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -31.4% +15.5% +16.0% HUBB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -3,697.6% 12.8% 13.8% HUBB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 10.3% 11.3% HUBB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.1x 3.0x HUBB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -42.1% +4.5% -4.0% ETN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -26.4%/yr +19.0%/yr +17.0%/yr ETN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 218.3% 40.7% 32.2% HUBB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 14/100 45/100 56/100 HUBB

Percentile Scorecard

AUSIETNHUBB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAUSIETNHUBB
Valuation 1 #202 of 203 14 #175 of 203 38 #127 of 203
Growth 44 #106 of 188 74 #50 of 188 72 #53 of 188
Profitability 10 #165 of 184 74 #49 of 184 86 #27 of 184
Financial Health 1 #216 of 217 20 #173 of 217 15 #184 of 217
Shareholder Returns – 43 #87 of 153 70 #46 of 153
Overall 14 45 56
  • AUSI ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • ETN ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • HUBB ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAUSIETNHUBBSPY
1 month -45.0%-8.9%-6.1% +0.9%
3 months -26.7%+8.6%-5.1% +5.9%
6 months -15.4%-4.3%-19.9% +8.5%
Year to date +57.1%+23.4%-1.5% +13.3%
1 year -42.1%+4.5%-4.0% +12.4%
3 years -38.9%+101.2%+55.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year -15.1%+26.3%+15.9% +23.5%
5 years -78.4%+138.6%+119.3% +68.2%
5 years, per year -26.4%+19.0%+17.0% +11.0%
10 years —+530.1%+318.1% +263.4%
10 years, per year —+20.2%+15.4% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureAUSIETNHUBBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 218.3%40.7%32.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 349.7%43.8%35.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.111.871.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.190.11-0.12 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -90.9%-34.7%-33.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -50.0%-14.5%-21.6% -0.9%
52-week high $0.22$459.94$557.85 $779.14
52-week low $0.07$315.82$407.36 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAUSIETNHUBB
P/E now vs peer median -3.5xmedian 25.4x 39.9xmedian 25.4x 25.5xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 128.2xmedian 1.9x 5.1xmedian 1.9x 3.5xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.3x 26.5xmedian 14.3x 17.3xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -9.1xmedian 21.8x 38.8xmedian 21.8x 24.9xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median -0.3xmedian 2.2x 7.5xmedian 2.2x 5.6xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.33median 1.41 3.00median 1.41 2.53median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAUSIETNHUBB
Revenue $127.00K $30.03B $6.59B
Gross profit $116.00K $10.78B $2.33B
Operating income -$3.73M $5.32B $1.33B
Net income -$4.70M $3.83B $915.00M
Free cash flow – $3.93B $928.00M
R&D $1.60M $844.00M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.03 $9.83 $17.12
Cash & equivalents $13.00K $483.00M $334.50M
Total debt $57.21M $20.61B $5.12B
Shares (diluted) 147.97M 389.50M 53.10M
Enterprise value $29.33M $149.39B $21.26B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAUSIETNHUBB
P/E -3.5x 39.9x 25.5x
P/FCF -9.1x 38.8x 24.9x
P/Operating cash flow – 30.8x 20.9x
P/S 128.2x 5.1x 3.5x
P/B -0.3x 7.5x 5.6x
P/Tangible book -0.3x 19.9x 23.7x
EV/EBITDA – 26.5x 17.3x
EV/EBIT -8.3x 32.5x 20.9x
EV/Revenue 242.3x 5.7x 4.2x
EV/FCF – 43.9x 30.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – 34.9x 25.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.33 3.00 2.53

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAUSIETNHUBB
Revenue growth (1Y) -31.4% 15.5% 16.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 25.0% 10.8% 7.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -27.5% 8.7% 17.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 48.9% 12.3% 9.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -14.7% 8.7% 15.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -6.3% 15.9% 10.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 33.8% -2.4% 5.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -2.6% 12.2% 9.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 44.8% -2.0% 6.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 10.5% 13.3% 10.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 21.9% 9.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 14.1% 12.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 20.1% 9.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 13.3% 14.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAUSIETNHUBB
Gross margin 91.3% 35.9% 35.4%
EBITDA margin – 21.7% 24.5%
Operating margin -2,934% 17.7% 20.2%
Pretax margin -4,554% 16.1% 17.7%
Net margin -3,698% 12.8% 13.8%
FCF margin – 13.1% 14.1%
Operating cash flow margin – 16.5% 16.8%
Return on equity – 19.1% 22.8%
Return on assets -402.7% 6.9% 7.7%
Return on invested capital – 10.3% 11.3%
Return on capital employed – 12.2% 13.5%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.5x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.3x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAUSIETNHUBB
Debt / assets 961.3% 36.7% 43.0%
Debt / equity -0.3x 1.0x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.1x 3.0x
Debt / FCF – 5.2x 5.5x
Liabilities / assets 3,433% 63.9% 65.4%
Equity / assets -3,333% 36.1% 34.6%
Interest coverage -1.8x 12.0x –
Current ratio 0.0x 1.2x 1.5x
Quick ratio 0.0x 0.7x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score -526.94 3.75 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAUSIETNHUBB
Dividend yield – 1.1% 1.3%
Net buyback yield – 0.3% 0.9%
Shareholder yield – 1.4% 2.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAUSIETNHUBB
Forward P/E – 28.3xFY2026 21.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $13.88FY2026 $20.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +15.0%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +14.4% +21.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $31.83BFY2026 $7.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +16.0%FY2026 +25.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +21.7% +9.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAUSIETNHUBB
Held by institutions – 84.7% 96.1%
Institutions holding – 2,642 1,015
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.6% -0.4%
Institutions buying – 1,399 511
Institutions selling – 892 318
Buyers to sellers – 1.57 1.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AUSIETNHUBB
AUSI 1.00 -0.04 0.10
ETN -0.04 1.00 0.63
HUBB 0.10 0.63 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AUSI, ETN and HUBB?

Eaton (ETN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Aura Systems (AUSI) $29.49M, Eaton (ETN) $152.20B, Hubbell (HUBB) $23.03B.

Which stock is cheaper, AUSI, ETN and HUBB?

Hubbell (HUBB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Aura Systems (AUSI) -6.3x, Eaton (ETN) 39.7x, Hubbell (HUBB) 25.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Hubbell (HUBB) is cheapest (Eaton (ETN) 28.3x, Hubbell (HUBB) 21.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Hubbell (HUBB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Aura Systems (AUSI) -31.4%, Eaton (ETN) +15.5%, Hubbell (HUBB) +16.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Hubbell (HUBB) has the highest net margin (Aura Systems (AUSI) -3,697.6%, Eaton (ETN) 12.8%, Hubbell (HUBB) 13.8%). On return on invested capital, Hubbell (HUBB) leads (Eaton (ETN) 10.3%, Hubbell (HUBB) 11.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Eaton (ETN) returned the most: Aura Systems (AUSI) -42.1%, Eaton (ETN) +4.5%, Hubbell (HUBB) -4.0%. Over five years, Eaton (ETN) compounded fastest (Aura Systems (AUSI) -26.4%/yr, Eaton (ETN) +19.0%/yr, Hubbell (HUBB) +17.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Hubbell (HUBB) has been the steadiest (Aura Systems (AUSI) 218.3%, Eaton (ETN) 40.7%, Hubbell (HUBB) 32.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AUSI, ETN and HUBB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Hubbell (HUBB) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.