AUPH vs NVS vs RGC Stock Comparison

Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Ag and Regencell Bioscience Holdings Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LLY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
NVS Novartis Ag
$164.95 +17.1% 1M +31.9% 1Y
Market cap
$314.75B
P/E
17.9x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
2.87%
Pharmaceuticals Healthcare
3 wins

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Novartis Ag leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Novartis Ag 3, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals 1, Regencell Bioscience Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAUPHNVSRGCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.29B $314.75B $2.69B NVS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7.3x 17.9x -229.1x AUPH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 17.8x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +21.0% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 97.7% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 2.87% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +19.9% +31.9% -58.7% NVS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -11.8%/yr +14.6%/yr +59.0%/yr RGC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.7% 27.8% 141.9% NVS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 91/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

AUPHNVSRGC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAUPHNVSRGC
Valuation 94 #39 of 634 97 #21 of 634 39 #386 of 634
Growth 95 #29 of 607 – –
Profitability 97 #18 of 557 – –
Financial Health 77 #153 of 654 – 90 #66 of 654
Shareholder Returns 92 #34 of 400 78 #88 of 400 –
Overall 91 – –
  • AUPH ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • NVS ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • RGC ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAUPHNVSRGCSPY
1 month +8.8%+17.1%-25.1% -1.0%
3 months +12.6%+6.8%-7.7% -0.4%
6 months +5.3%+11.2%-80.4% +4.5%
Year to date +7.3%+19.6%-74.2% +12.4%
1 year +19.9%+31.9%-58.7% +13.6%
3 years +107.9%+77.8%+1,368.0% +76.4%
3 years, per year +27.7%+21.2%+145.0% +20.8%
5 years -46.5%+97.2%+915.2% +63.7%
5 years, per year -11.8%+14.6%+59.0% +10.4%
10 years +533.7%+134.8%— +267.7%
10 years, per year +20.3%+8.9%— +13.9%

Risk

MeasureAUPHNVSRGCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.7%27.8%141.9% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.1%30.0%132.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.650.371.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.561.15-0.41 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -87.1%-20.4%-93.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.1%-2.2%-89.8% -1.6%
52-week high $18.62$168.62$52.88 $779.14
52-week low $13.95$124.36$4.78 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAUPHNVSRGC
P/E now vs peer median 7.3xmedian 18.0x 17.9xmedian 18.0x -229.1xmedian 18.0x
P/S now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 9.1x 5.1xmedian 9.1x —median 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.3xmedian 16.2x —median 16.2x —median 16.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.0xmedian 21.7x 14.3xmedian 21.7x -349.3xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 2.2x —median 2.2x 201.3xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.09median 0.38 —median 0.38 —median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAUPHNVSRGC
Revenue $321.74M – –
Gross profit $291.57M – –
Operating income $156.37M – –
Net income $314.27M – –
Free cash flow $177.03M – –
R&D $48.03M – –
EPS (diluted) $2.32 – –
Cash & equivalents $46.15M $400.00M $14.19M
Total debt – – $10.79K
Shares (diluted) 135.17M 1.96B 494.60M
Enterprise value $585.87M $288.32B $2.66B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAUPHNVSRGC
P/E 7.3x 17.9x -229.1x
P/FCF 13.0x 14.3x -349.3x
P/Operating cash flow 12.9x – –
P/S 7.1x 5.1x –
P/B 3.5x – 201.3x
P/Tangible book 3.5x – 201.3x
EV/EBITDA 10.3x – –
EV/EBIT 11.5x – –
EV/Revenue 5.6x – –
EV/FCF 10.2x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 10.2x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.09 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAUPHNVSRGC
Revenue growth (1Y) 21.0% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 26.5% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.3% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 25.2% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 123.4% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 55.2% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 303.7% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 82.4% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 306.2% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 84.7% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 47.5% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 89.0% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 47.7% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 88.3% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAUPHNVSRGC
Gross margin 90.6% – –
EBITDA margin 54.6% – –
Operating margin 48.6% – –
Pretax margin 51.9% – –
Net margin 97.7% – –
FCF margin 55.0% – –
Operating cash flow margin 55.1% – –
Return on equity 49.4% – –
Return on assets 38.8% – –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed 21.9% – –
Asset turnover 0.4x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x – –
Stock comp / revenue 4.6% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAUPHNVSRGC
Debt / assets – – 0.1%
Debt / equity – – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 20.4% – 9.4%
Equity / assets 79.6% – 90.6%
Interest coverage 40.4x – –
Current ratio 6.1x – 10.8x
Quick ratio 5.6x – 10.7x
Cash ratio 5.1x – 10.7x
Altman Z-score 8.98 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAUPHNVSRGC
Dividend yield – 2.9% –
Net buyback yield 0.1% – –
Shareholder yield 0.1% 2.9% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAUPHNVSRGC
Forward P/E – 17.8xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $9.26FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – +3.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +1.2% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $53.95BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – -1.1%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +19.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAUPHNVSRGC
Held by institutions 58.7% 7.0% 0.3%
Institutions holding 283 1,609 36
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.4% -5.9% +116.7%
Institutions buying 157 662 28
Institutions selling 80 562 5
Buyers to sellers 1.96 1.18 5.60

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AUPHNVSRGC
AUPH 1.00 0.20 0.06
NVS 0.20 1.00 0.05
RGC 0.06 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AUPH, NVS and RGC?

Novartis Ag (NVS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals (AUPH) $2.29B, Novartis Ag (NVS) $314.75B, Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) $2.69B.

Which stock is cheaper, AUPH, NVS and RGC?

Aurinia Pharmaceuticals (AUPH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Aurinia Pharmaceuticals (AUPH) 7.3x, Novartis Ag (NVS) 17.9x, Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) -229.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Novartis Ag (NVS) returned the most: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals (AUPH) +19.9%, Novartis Ag (NVS) +31.9%, Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) -58.7%. Over five years, Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) compounded fastest (Aurinia Pharmaceuticals (AUPH) -11.8%/yr, Novartis Ag (NVS) +14.6%/yr, Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) +59.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Novartis Ag (NVS) 2.87%, Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) 0.00%. Aurinia Pharmaceuticals (AUPH) and Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Novartis Ag (NVS) has been the steadiest (Aurinia Pharmaceuticals (AUPH) 35.7%, Novartis Ag (NVS) 27.8%, Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) 141.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AUPH, NVS and RGC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Novartis Ag (NVS) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.