AUDC vs SANG vs EXTR Stock Comparison

Audiocodes, Sangoma Technologies and Extreme Networks Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ERIC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AUDC Audiocodes Ltd
$11.58 +9.2% 1M +29.1% 1Y
Market cap
$313.69M
P/E
46.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$249.25M
Div. yield
3.45%
Networking Equipment Technology
3 wins
SANG Sangoma Technologies Corp
$4.71 -4.5% 1M -7.5% 1Y
Market cap
$157.03M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$203.08M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
1 win
EXTR Extreme Networks Inc
$23.59 +12.0% 1M +31.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.12B
P/E
59.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.31B
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Extreme Networks leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Extreme Networks 7, Audiocodes 3, Sangoma Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAUDCSANGEXTRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $313.69M $157.03M $3.12B EXTR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 46.7x -2.0x 59.1x AUDC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.1x — 17.1x EXTR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.5% -14.2% +11.3% EXTR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.8% -39.0% 4.0% EXTR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.1% 54.0% 23.5% SANG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.9x 0.2x -0.4x AUDC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 3.45% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +29.1% -7.5% +31.0% EXTR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -20.1%/yr -26.5%/yr +19.1%/yr EXTR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.0% 51.2% 53.1% AUDC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 41/100 59/100 EXTR

Percentile Scorecard

AUDCSANGEXTR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAUDCSANGEXTR
Valuation 87 #15 of 112 93 #3 of 29 53 #53 of 112
Growth 15 #92 of 108 0 #27 of 27 51 #54 of 108
Profitability 69 #33 of 104 44 #15 of 26 76 #26 of 104
Financial Health 69 #37 of 116 47 #17 of 31 24 #89 of 116
Shareholder Returns 38 #49 of 78 21 #12 of 15 90 #9 of 78
Overall 56 41 59
  • AUDC ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • SANG ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • EXTR ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAUDCSANGEXTRSPY
1 month +9.2%-4.5%+12.0% +0.7%
3 months +25.2%+15.7%-20.9% +3.7%
6 months +25.1%+10.3%+6.8% +7.1%
Year to date +32.6%-7.1%+41.7% +12.8%
1 year +29.1%-7.5%+31.0% +11.9%
3 years +54.6%+65.3%+19.0% +85.2%
3 years, per year +15.6%+18.2%+6.0% +22.8%
5 years -67.3%-78.6%+140.0% +67.6%
5 years, per year -20.1%-26.5%+19.1% +10.9%
10 years +117.3%+124.3%+482.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year +8.1%+8.4%+19.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureAUDCSANGEXTRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.0%51.2%53.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.9%42.2%51.4% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.150.191.57 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.69-0.150.58 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -81.0%-89.2%-67.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.0%-12.8%-30.0% -1.2%
52-week high $11.70$5.40$33.71 $779.14
52-week low $7.03$3.42$13.74 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAUDCSANGEXTR
P/E now vs peer median 46.7xmedian 32.9x -2.0xmedian 33.1x 59.1xmedian 32.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 2.9x 0.8xmedian 2.5x 2.4xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.7xmedian 20.0x 1.7xmedian 9.8x 30.7xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.6xmedian 30.2x 7.2xmedian 15.2x 20.2xmedian 30.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 2.9x 0.9xmedian 3.1x 35.4xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median -2.77median 1.08 0.05median 0.74 -3.29median 1.08

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAUDCSANGEXTR
Revenue $249.25M $203.08M $1.31B
Gross profit $163.86M $143.68M $813.05M
Operating income $14.36M $66.76M $74.49M
Net income $7.06M -$81.09M $52.49M
Free cash flow $32.61M $21.92M $154.76M
R&D $54.05M $42.90M $233.95M
EPS (diluted) $0.24 $-2.38 $0.39
Cash & equivalents $51.41M $10.43M $244.52M
Total debt $27.00M $89.10M $200.00M
Shares (diluted) 28.98M 33.24M 134.68M
Enterprise value $40.56M $98.53M $2.23B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAUDCSANGEXTR
P/E 46.7x -2.0x 59.1x
P/FCF 9.6x 7.2x 20.2x
P/Operating cash flow 11.6x 6.6x 17.1x
P/S 1.3x 0.8x 2.4x
P/B 2.2x 0.9x 35.4x
P/Tangible book 2.9x 1.4x 36.5x
EV/EBITDA 13.7x 1.7x 30.7x
EV/EBIT 18.1x 2.6x 41.3x
EV/Revenue 1.0x 0.9x 2.3x
EV/FCF 8.0x 7.9x 19.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.6x 7.3x 16.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.77 0.05 -3.29

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAUDCSANGEXTR
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.5% -14.2% 11.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.3% -7.0% -1.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.5% -11.2% 11.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -0.2% -6.0% 0.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -5.7% -18.1% 126.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -5.0% -18.7% -16.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -48.7% -1,519% 506.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -20.0% -40.8% -17.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -45.8% -1,493% 508.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -16.9% -39.6% -18.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -38.9% -43.3% 52.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 50.4% -9.9% -12.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -42.4% -50.4% 63.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 39.0% -8.2% -15.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAUDCSANGEXTR
Gross margin 65.7% 70.7% 61.9%
EBITDA margin 7.6% 50.3% 7.6%
Operating margin 5.8% 32.9% 5.7%
Pretax margin 4.5% -41.7% 4.7%
Net margin 2.8% -39.0% 4.0%
FCF margin 13.1% 10.8% 11.8%
Operating cash flow margin 10.9% 11.7% 13.9%
Return on equity 10.3% -87.1% 59.4%
Return on assets 5.0% – 4.2%
Return on invested capital 9.1% 54.0% 23.5%
Return on capital employed 6.5% – 12.8%
Asset turnover 0.8x – 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.8x -0.3x 3.5x
Stock comp / revenue 2.4% 1.2% 6.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAUDCSANGEXTR
Debt / assets 2.4% 11.6% 15.4%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.2x 2.3x
Net debt / EBITDA -2.9x 0.2x -0.4x
Debt / FCF 0.2x 1.2x 1.3x
Liabilities / assets 52.8% 25.8% 93.2%
Equity / assets 47.2% 74.2% 6.8%
Interest coverage – 33.0x 4.9x
Current ratio 1.9x 0.8x 1.0x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.5x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – 1.94 1.79

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAUDCSANGEXTR
Dividend yield 3.5% – –
Net buyback yield -13.2% -0.1% 3.2%
Shareholder yield -9.7% -0.1% 3.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAUDCSANGEXTR
Forward P/E 18.1xFY2026 – 17.1xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $0.64FY2026 $-0.17FY2027 $1.38FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +4.9%FY2026 – +30.2%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +3.1% – +2.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $265.51MFY2026 $192.47MFY2027 $1.34BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +8.1%FY2026 -3.8%FY2027 +4.5%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +1.2% +3.5% +21.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAUDCSANGEXTR
Held by institutions 33.5% – 96.7%
Institutions holding 67 – 338
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.5% – +1.2%
Institutions buying 31 – 181
Institutions selling 20 – 121
Buyers to sellers 1.55 – 1.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AUDCSANGEXTR
AUDC 1.00 0.10 0.26
SANG 0.10 1.00 0.07
EXTR 0.26 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AUDC, SANG and EXTR?

Extreme Networks (EXTR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Audiocodes (AUDC) $313.69M, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) $157.03M, Extreme Networks (EXTR) $3.12B.

Which stock is cheaper, AUDC, SANG and EXTR?

Audiocodes (AUDC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Audiocodes (AUDC) 46.7x, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -2.0x, Extreme Networks (EXTR) 59.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Extreme Networks (EXTR) is cheapest (Audiocodes (AUDC) 18.1x, Extreme Networks (EXTR) 17.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Extreme Networks (EXTR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Audiocodes (AUDC) +2.5%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -14.2%, Extreme Networks (EXTR) +11.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Extreme Networks (EXTR) has the highest net margin (Audiocodes (AUDC) 2.8%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -39.0%, Extreme Networks (EXTR) 4.0%). On return on invested capital, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) leads (Audiocodes (AUDC) 9.1%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 54.0%, Extreme Networks (EXTR) 23.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Extreme Networks (EXTR) returned the most: Audiocodes (AUDC) +29.1%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -7.5%, Extreme Networks (EXTR) +31.0%. Over five years, Extreme Networks (EXTR) compounded fastest (Audiocodes (AUDC) -20.1%/yr, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -26.5%/yr, Extreme Networks (EXTR) +19.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Audiocodes (AUDC) 3.45%. Sangoma Technologies (SANG) and Extreme Networks (EXTR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Audiocodes (AUDC) has been the steadiest (Audiocodes (AUDC) 42.0%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 51.2%, Extreme Networks (EXTR) 53.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AUDC, SANG and EXTR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Extreme Networks (EXTR) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.