AUDC vs RNG vs ZM Stock Comparison

Audiocodes, RingCentral and Zoom Communications Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DOX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AUDC Audiocodes Ltd
$7.65 -29.8% 1M -21.0% 1Y
Market cap
$207.23M
P/E
27.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$251.85M
Div. yield
5.23%
Networking Equipment Technology
3 wins
RNG RingCentral, Inc.
$74.30 -3.9% 1M +172.1% 1Y
Market cap
$6.27B
P/E
9.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.62B
Div. yield
0.36%
Communications Platforms Technology
3 wins
ZM Zoom Communications, Inc.
$88.82 -5.7% 1M +6.3% 1Y
Market cap
$25.96B
P/E
8.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.99B
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Zoom Communications leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Zoom Communications 6, Audiocodes 3, RingCentral 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAUDCRNGZMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $207.23M $6.27B $25.96B ZM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.4x 9.4x 8.0x ZM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.0x 14.1x 13.8x AUDC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.0% +5.5% +5.0% RNG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.2% 25.3% 65.2% ZM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.5% 26.1% — RNG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.1x 1.5x — AUDC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 5.23% 0.36% — AUDC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -21.0% +172.1% +6.3% RNG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -26.6%/yr -20.5%/yr -19.6%/yr ZM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.1% 67.4% 44.9% ZM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 62/100 77/100 ZM

Percentile Scorecard

AUDCRNGZM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAUDCRNGZM
Valuation 92 #10 of 112 75 #8 of 29 71 #9 of 29
Growth 21 #86 of 108 78 #7 of 28 63 #11 of 28
Profitability 67 #35 of 104 77 #7 of 27 85 #5 of 27
Financial Health 60 #47 of 116 20 #25 of 31 97 #2 of 31
Shareholder Returns 37 #53 of 83 62 #9 of 22 71 #7 of 22
Overall 55 62 77
  • AUDC ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • RNG ranked among 31 companies in Workplace Software
  • ZM ranked among 31 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAUDCRNGZMSPY
1 month -29.8%-3.9%-5.7% -5.9%
3 months -22.7%+20.1%-12.3% -4.6%
6 months -8.4%+63.7%-18.0% +0.2%
Year to date -12.4%+157.3%+2.9% +7.5%
1 year -21.0%+172.1%+6.3% +8.2%
3 years -21.4%+163.0%+43.7% +68.3%
3 years, per year -7.7%+38.1%+12.8% +19.0%
5 years -78.7%-68.3%-66.4% +56.5%
5 years, per year -26.6%-20.5%-19.6% +9.4%
10 years +43.5%+270.6%— +251.5%
10 years, per year +3.7%+14.0%— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureAUDCRNGZMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.1%67.4%44.9% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 59.6%55.3%43.0% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.991.091.01 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.432.550.14 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -81.0%-92.4%-79.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -34.6%-14.0%-20.6% -5.9%
52-week high $11.70$86.35$111.88 $779.14
52-week low $7.03$24.82$72.72 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAUDCRNGZM
P/E now vs peer median 27.4xmedian 25.2x 9.4xmedian 34.8x 8.0xmedian 34.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.4x 2.4xmedian 2.1x 5.2xmedian 2.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.3xmedian 16.2x 12.3xmedian 11.9x 11.9xmedian 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 23.4x 9.4xmedian 13.6x 13.5xmedian 13.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 2.3x -506.6xmedian 3.1x 2.3xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median -2.49median 0.98 0.17median 0.73 0.04median 0.73

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAUDCRNGZM
Revenue $251.85M $2.62B $4.99B
Gross profit $165.71M $1.89B $3.86B
Operating income $13.67M $196.64M $1.19B
Net income $7.97M $662.40M $3.26B
Free cash flow $32.12M $667.24M $1.93B
R&D $54.31M $330.14M $903.44M
EPS (diluted) $0.27 $7.55 $10.86
Cash & equivalents $41.99M $110.12M $931.99M
Total debt $7.12M $1.01B –
Shares (diluted) 28.98M 87.69M 299.75M
Enterprise value -$36.68M $5.80B -$4.77B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAUDCRNGZM
P/E 27.4x 9.4x 8.0x
P/FCF 6.5x 9.4x 13.5x
P/Operating cash flow 7.6x 9.0x 13.0x
P/S 0.8x 2.4x 5.2x
P/B 1.6x -506.6x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 2.4x -111.2x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA 9.3x 12.3x 11.9x
EV/EBIT 12.4x 36.5x 15.8x
EV/Revenue 0.7x 2.7x 3.7x
EV/FCF 5.3x 10.8x 9.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 6.3x 10.3x 9.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.49 0.17 0.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAUDCRNGZM
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.0% 5.5% 5.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.0% 6.7% 3.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.0% 7.0% 6.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.7% 8.0% 4.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) -5.1% 109.8% 22.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -4.2% 35.4% 112.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -42.4% 4,905% 174.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -14.3% 53.9% 184.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -39.1% 5,149% 181.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -11.0% 55.7% 186.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -33.1% 16.3% 4.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 65.0% 29.1% 16.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -34.3% 16.5% 4.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 40.1% 30.7% 19.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAUDCRNGZM
Gross margin 65.8% 72.2% 77.3%
EBITDA margin 7.2% 22.2% 31.4%
Operating margin 5.4% 7.5% 23.7%
Pretax margin 4.7% 5.0% 83.8%
Net margin 3.2% 25.3% 65.2%
FCF margin 12.8% 25.5% 38.6%
Operating cash flow margin 10.8% 26.7% 40.1%
Return on equity 11.3% – 30.6%
Return on assets 5.2% 40.7% 25.3%
Return on invested capital 9.5% 26.1% –
Return on capital employed 6.4% 20.7% 11.0%
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.6x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.4x 1.1x 0.6x
Stock comp / revenue 2.3% 9.2% 14.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAUDCRNGZM
Debt / assets 2.4% 53.9% –
Debt / equity 0.1x -81.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA -2.1x 1.5x –
Debt / FCF 0.2x 1.5x –
Liabilities / assets 56.2% 100.7% 16.8%
Equity / assets 43.8% -0.7% 83.2%
Interest coverage – 3.1x –
Current ratio 1.7x 1.1x 3.8x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.9x 3.7x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.2x 3.4x
Altman Z-score – 2.95 8.80

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAUDCRNGZM
Dividend yield 5.2% 0.4% –
Net buyback yield -21.1% 5.1% 5.4%
Shareholder yield -15.9% 5.5% 5.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAUDCRNGZM
Forward P/E 12.0xFY2026 14.1xFY2026 13.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.64FY2026 $5.28FY2026 $6.45FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +4.9%FY2026 +21.1%FY2026 +9.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +3.1% +0.6% +2.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $265.51MFY2026 $2.76BFY2026 $4.76BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.1%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026 -2.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.2% -3.9% +8.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAUDCRNGZM
Held by institutions 33.5% 100.0% 76.2%
Institutions holding 67 379 865
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.5% +2.0% +2.9%
Institutions buying 31 212 479
Institutions selling 20 121 280
Buyers to sellers 1.55 1.75 1.71

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AUDCRNGZM
AUDC 1.00 0.28 0.31
RNG 0.28 1.00 0.51
ZM 0.31 0.51 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AUDC, RNG and ZM?

Zoom Communications (ZM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Audiocodes (AUDC) $207.23M, RingCentral (RNG) $6.27B, Zoom Communications (ZM) $25.96B.

Which stock is cheaper, AUDC, RNG and ZM?

Zoom Communications (ZM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Audiocodes (AUDC) 27.4x, RingCentral (RNG) 9.4x, Zoom Communications (ZM) 8.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Audiocodes (AUDC) is cheapest (Audiocodes (AUDC) 12.0x, RingCentral (RNG) 14.1x, Zoom Communications (ZM) 13.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

RingCentral (RNG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Audiocodes (AUDC) +3.0%, RingCentral (RNG) +5.5%, Zoom Communications (ZM) +5.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Zoom Communications (ZM) has the highest net margin (Audiocodes (AUDC) 3.2%, RingCentral (RNG) 25.3%, Zoom Communications (ZM) 65.2%). On return on invested capital, RingCentral (RNG) leads (Audiocodes (AUDC) 9.5%, RingCentral (RNG) 26.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year RingCentral (RNG) returned the most: Audiocodes (AUDC) -21.0%, RingCentral (RNG) +172.1%, Zoom Communications (ZM) +6.3%. Over five years, Zoom Communications (ZM) compounded fastest (Audiocodes (AUDC) -26.6%/yr, RingCentral (RNG) -20.5%/yr, Zoom Communications (ZM) -19.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Audiocodes (AUDC) has the highest dividend yield: Audiocodes (AUDC) 5.23%, RingCentral (RNG) 0.36%. Zoom Communications (ZM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Zoom Communications (ZM) has been the steadiest (Audiocodes (AUDC) 49.1%, RingCentral (RNG) 67.4%, Zoom Communications (ZM) 44.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AUDC, RNG and ZM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Zoom Communications (ZM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.