AUDC vs ALLT vs ERIC Stock Comparison

Audiocodes, Allot and Ericsson Lm Telephone Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DGII) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AUDC Audiocodes Ltd
$11.58 +9.2% 1M +29.1% 1Y
Market cap
$320.60M
P/E
45.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$249.25M
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
1 win
ALLT Allot Ltd.
$8.94 +5.9% 1M -8.1% 1Y
Market cap
$383.85M
P/E
37.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$108.95M
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
4 wins
ERIC Ericsson Lm Telephone Co
$11.14 +19.5% 1M +10.3% 1Y
Market cap
$36.98B
P/E
18.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$24.56B
Div. yield
-0.03%
Networking Equipment Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ericsson Lm Telephone leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Ericsson Lm Telephone 6, Allot 4, Audiocodes 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAUDCALLTERICLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $320.60M $383.85M $36.98B ERIC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 45.4x 37.5x 18.1x ERIC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.1x 25.5x 17.1x ERIC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.5% +14.3% -38.5% ALLT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.8% 9.4% 8.3% ALLT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.1% 5.4% 20.0% ERIC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.9x -6.7x -0.6x ALLT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% -0.03% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +29.1% -8.1% +10.3% AUDC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -20.1%/yr -9.7%/yr +0.5%/yr ERIC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.0% 62.0% 36.1% ERIC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 77/100 60/100 ALLT

Percentile Scorecard

AUDCALLTERIC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAUDCALLTERIC
Valuation 87 #15 of 112 69 #36 of 112 88 #14 of 112
Growth 15 #92 of 108 87 #15 of 108 45 #60 of 108
Profitability 69 #33 of 104 75 #27 of 104 86 #15 of 104
Financial Health 69 #37 of 116 77 #27 of 116 39 #71 of 116
Shareholder Returns 38 #49 of 78 – 39 #48 of 78
Overall 56 77 60
  • AUDC ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • ALLT ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • ERIC ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAUDCALLTERICSPY
1 month +9.2%+5.9%+19.5% +0.7%
3 months +25.2%+19.0%+14.0% +3.7%
6 months +25.1%+21.8%-5.7% +7.1%
Year to date +32.6%-9.1%+15.4% +12.8%
1 year +29.1%-8.1%+10.3% +11.9%
3 years +54.6%+388.5%+155.5% +85.2%
3 years, per year +15.6%+69.7%+36.7% +22.8%
5 years -67.3%-39.8%+2.5% +67.6%
5 years, per year -20.1%-9.7%+0.5% +10.9%
10 years +117.3%+70.0%+128.7% +262.0%
10 years, per year +8.1%+5.4%+8.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureAUDCALLTERICSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.0%62.0%36.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.9%71.8%36.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.151.591.02 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.69-0.130.28 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -81.0%-91.8%-65.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.0%-22.3%-18.9% -1.2%
52-week high $11.70$11.50$13.74 $779.14
52-week low $7.03$6.25$9.15 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAUDCALLTERIC
P/E now vs peer median 46.7xmedian 32.9x 38.5xmedian 32.9x 18.2xmedian 32.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 2.9x 4.0xmedian 2.9x 1.5xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.7xmedian 20.0x 35.4xmedian 20.0x 9.4xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.6xmedian 30.2x 13.0xmedian 30.2x 10.0xmedian 30.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 2.9x 3.6xmedian 2.9x 3.4xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median -2.77median 1.08 1.32median 1.08 0.42median 1.08

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAUDCALLTERIC
Revenue $249.25M $108.95M $24.56B
Gross profit $163.86M $77.68M $11.51B
Operating income $14.36M $7.35M $2.90B
Net income $7.06M $10.24M $2.04B
Free cash flow $32.61M $33.47M $3.76B
R&D $54.05M $24.52M $5.22B
EPS (diluted) $0.24 $0.22 $0.61
Cash & equivalents $51.41M $13.76M $5.11B
Total debt $27.00M $3.57M $3.73B
Shares (diluted) 28.98M 46.18M 3.34B
Enterprise value $47.47M $136.10M $14.59B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAUDCALLTERIC
P/E 46.7x 38.5x 18.2x
P/FCF 9.6x 13.0x 10.0x
P/Operating cash flow 11.6x 13.9x 10.9x
P/S 1.3x 4.0x 1.5x
P/B 2.2x 3.6x 3.4x
P/Tangible book 2.9x 3.6x 3.4x
EV/EBITDA 13.7x 35.4x 9.4x
EV/EBIT 18.1x 49.7x 12.2x
EV/Revenue 1.0x 3.4x 1.4x
EV/FCF 8.0x 10.9x 9.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.6x 11.7x 10.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.77 1.32 0.42

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAUDCALLTERIC
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.5% 14.3% -38.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.3% 1.5% -2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.5% 16.3% 3.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -0.2% 4.0% 4.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -5.7% 819.6% -18.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -5.0% 28.8% 55.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -48.7% 605.8% -18.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -20.0% 30.0% 43.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -45.8% 526.3% -17.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -16.9% 29.2% 43.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -38.9% 168.4% 4.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 50.4% 41.3% 44.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -42.4% 168.0% 6.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 39.0% 43.8% 34.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAUDCALLTERIC
Gross margin 65.7% 71.3% 46.8%
EBITDA margin 7.6% 9.5% 15.4%
Operating margin 5.8% 6.7% 11.8%
Pretax margin 4.5% 10.8% 11.2%
Net margin 2.8% 9.4% 8.3%
FCF margin 13.1% 30.7% 15.3%
Operating cash flow margin 10.9% 28.7% 14.0%
Return on equity 10.3% 8.7% 18.7%
Return on assets 5.0% 5.2% 6.8%
Return on invested capital 9.1% 5.4% 20.0%
Return on capital employed 6.5% 5.8% 17.8%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.6x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.8x 3.0x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 2.4% 4.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAUDCALLTERIC
Debt / assets 2.4% 0.8% 12.4%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.0x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA -2.9x -6.7x -0.6x
Debt / FCF 0.2x 0.0x 1.0x
Liabilities / assets 52.8% 41.4% 63.1%
Equity / assets 47.2% 58.6% 36.9%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.9x 2.3x 1.2x
Quick ratio 1.4x 1.4x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.7x 1.0x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – 2.50 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAUDCALLTERIC
Dividend yield 3.5% – 2.8%
Net buyback yield -13.2% – -2.2%
Shareholder yield -9.7% – 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 50.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 27.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – -13.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -7.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAUDCALLTERIC
Forward P/E 18.1xFY2026 25.5xFY2026 17.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.64FY2026 $0.35FY2026 $0.65FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +4.9%FY2026 +52.2%FY2026 -30.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +3.1% +5.7% -3.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $265.51MFY2026 $120.75MFY2026 $24.16BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.1%FY2026 +18.4%FY2026 -8.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.2% +11.3% +1.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAUDCALLTERIC
Held by institutions 33.5% 82.4% 9.5%
Institutions holding 67 82 389
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.5% +1.0% +0.4%
Institutions buying 31 49 220
Institutions selling 20 19 110
Buyers to sellers 1.55 2.58 2.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AUDCALLTERIC
AUDC 1.00 0.24 0.21
ALLT 0.24 1.00 0.10
ERIC 0.21 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AUDC, ALLT and ERIC?

Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Audiocodes (AUDC) $320.60M, Allot (ALLT) $383.85M, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) $36.98B.

Which stock is cheaper, AUDC, ALLT and ERIC?

Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Audiocodes (AUDC) 45.4x, Allot (ALLT) 37.5x, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 18.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) is cheapest (Audiocodes (AUDC) 18.1x, Allot (ALLT) 25.5x, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 17.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Allot (ALLT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Audiocodes (AUDC) +2.5%, Allot (ALLT) +14.3%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) -38.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Allot (ALLT) has the highest net margin (Audiocodes (AUDC) 2.8%, Allot (ALLT) 9.4%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 8.3%). On return on invested capital, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) leads (Audiocodes (AUDC) 9.1%, Allot (ALLT) 5.4%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 20.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Audiocodes (AUDC) returned the most: Audiocodes (AUDC) +29.1%, Allot (ALLT) -8.1%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) +10.3%. Over five years, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) compounded fastest (Audiocodes (AUDC) -20.1%/yr, Allot (ALLT) -9.7%/yr, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) +0.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) has been the steadiest (Audiocodes (AUDC) 42.0%, Allot (ALLT) 62.0%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 36.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AUDC, ALLT and ERIC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.