ATVK vs FLNC vs JZXN Stock Comparison

Globaltek Ventures, Fluence Energy and Jiuzi Holdings Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EOSE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FLNC Fluence Energy, Inc.
$6.06 -20.8% 1M -68.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.12B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.63B
Div. yield
–
Energy Storage Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Globaltek Ventures leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Globaltek Ventures 4, Fluence Energy 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionATVKFLNCJZXNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.82B $1.12B $1.37M ATVK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 352.1x -10.4x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -95.1% +7.5% — FLNC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13,318.1% -3.1% — ATVK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.2x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -46.9% -68.4% -89.9% ATVK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +0.5%/yr -29.3%/yr -86.1%/yr ATVK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 306.3% 115.2% 201.9% FLNC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 30/100 51/100 — FLNC

Percentile Scorecard

ATVKFLNCJZXN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisATVKFLNCJZXN
Valuation 55 #29 of 63 60 #26 of 63 –
Growth 10 #54 of 60 56 #27 of 60 –
Profitability 39 #35 of 57 66 #20 of 57 –
Financial Health 14 #62 of 72 27 #53 of 72 87 #10 of 72
Shareholder Returns – 48 #17 of 32 –
Overall 30 51 –
  • ATVK ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • FLNC ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • JZXN ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodATVKFLNCJZXNSPY
1 month -40.7%-20.8%-4.4% -1.0%
3 months -9.0%-57.4%-32.3% -0.4%
6 months -69.4%-55.3%+23.9% +4.5%
Year to date -82.2%-69.4%-37.0% +12.4%
1 year -46.9%-68.4%-89.9% +13.6%
3 years +87.3%-68.1%-99.7% +76.4%
3 years, per year +23.3%-31.7%-86.0% +20.8%
5 years +2.7%-82.4%-100.0% +63.7%
5 years, per year +0.5%-29.3%-86.1% +10.4%
10 years -97.9%—— +267.7%
10 years, per year -32.0%—— +13.9%

Risk

MeasureATVKFLNCJZXNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 306.3%115.2%201.9% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 449.4%113.3%184.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.124.202.16 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.15-0.59-0.45 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.5%-90.4%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -84.8%-81.2%-89.9% -1.6%
52-week high $25.20$32.23$10.76 $779.14
52-week low $3.82$5.21$0.85 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleATVKFLNCJZXN
P/E now vs peer median 352.1xmedian 26.4x -10.4xmedian 26.4x —median 26.4x
P/S now vs peer median 53,339xmedian 2.6x 0.4xmedian 2.6x —median 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2,607xmedian 19.6x 18.8xmedian 19.6x —median 19.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 4,416xmedian 29.9x -9.7xmedian 29.9x —median 29.9x
P/B now vs peer median -1,576xmedian 1.8x 2.6xmedian 1.8x 0.0xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 1.45median 0.71 -0.71median 0.71 —median 0.71

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsATVKFLNCJZXN
Revenue $34.20K $2.63B –
Gross profit – $245.82M –
Operating income -$728.67K -$4.58M –
Net income -$775.27K -$112.04M –
Free cash flow $413.05K -$115.33M –
R&D – $84.24M –
EPS (diluted) $0.01 $-0.59 –
Cash & equivalents $29.33K $339.33M $271.07K
Total debt $1.60M – –
Shares (diluted) 419.75M 138.13M 346.87K
Enterprise value $1.82B -$693.45M -$4.76M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricATVKFLNCJZXN
P/E 352.1x -10.4x –
P/FCF 4,416x -9.7x –
P/Operating cash flow 4,416x -11.1x –
P/S 53,339x 0.4x –
P/B -1,576x 2.6x 0.0x
P/Tangible book -1,481x 3.0x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA -2,607x 18.8x –
EV/EBIT -2,505x -170.3x –
EV/Revenue 53,385x 0.3x –
EV/FCF 4,420x -6.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow 4,420x -7.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.45 -0.71 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricATVKFLNCJZXN
Revenue growth (1Y) -95.1% 7.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -70.7% 9.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -20.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 48.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -238.8% -106.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -162.8% 67.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) -105.7% -360.6% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -178.6% 12.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) -23.7% -483.8% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 242.2% 14.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 74.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.1% 35.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 72.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.1% 33.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricATVKFLNCJZXN
Gross margin – 9.3% –
EBITDA margin -2,048% 1.6% –
Operating margin -2,131% -0.2% –
Pretax margin -2,267% -3.6% –
Net margin 13,318% -3.1% –
FCF margin 1,208% -4.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 1,208% -3.8% –
Return on equity – -25.2% –
Return on assets -152.5% -4.5% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -29.2% -0.6% –
Asset turnover 0.0x 1.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.5x 0.9x –
Stock comp / revenue 3,211% 0.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricATVKFLNCJZXN
Debt / assets 150.7% – –
Debt / equity -1.4x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -2.2x – –
Debt / FCF 3.9x – –
Liabilities / assets 209.0% 83.5% 5.1%
Equity / assets -109.0% 16.5% 94.9%
Interest coverage -15.6x – –
Current ratio 0.0x 1.3x 17.0x
Quick ratio 0.0x 0.6x 20.9x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 482.96 1.42 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricATVKFLNCJZXN
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -0.3% –
Shareholder yield – -0.3% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusATVKFLNCJZXN
EPS, next fiscal year – $-1.18FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $2.49BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +10.0%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +17.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersATVKFLNCJZXN
Held by institutions – 90.9% –
Institutions holding – 303 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.9% –
Institutions buying – 189 –
Institutions selling – 84 –
Buyers to sellers – 2.25 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ATVKFLNCJZXN
ATVK 1.00 0.00 0.10
FLNC 0.00 1.00 0.19
JZXN 0.10 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ATVK, FLNC and JZXN?

Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) $1.82B, Fluence Energy (FLNC) $1.12B, Jiuzi Holdings (JZXN) $1.37M.

Which company is growing faster?

Fluence Energy (FLNC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) -95.1%, Fluence Energy (FLNC) +7.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) has the highest net margin (Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) 13,318.1%, Fluence Energy (FLNC) -3.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) returned the most: Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) -46.9%, Fluence Energy (FLNC) -68.4%, Jiuzi Holdings (JZXN) -89.9%. Over five years, Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) compounded fastest (Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) +0.5%/yr, Fluence Energy (FLNC) -29.3%/yr, Jiuzi Holdings (JZXN) -86.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fluence Energy (FLNC) has been the steadiest (Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) 306.3%, Fluence Energy (FLNC) 115.2%, Jiuzi Holdings (JZXN) 201.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ATVK, FLNC and JZXN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.