ATS vs GTX vs DOV Stock Comparison

Ats, Garrett Motion and Dover Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MTD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ATS ATS Corp /ATS
$18.92 +3.6% 1M -29.8% 1Y
Market cap
$1.72B
P/E
50.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.12B
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
1 win
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.
$20.77 -23.3% 1M +20.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.73B
P/E
9.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.78B
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
6 wins
DOV DOVER Corp
$213.58 +12.6% 1M +19.9% 1Y
Market cap
$28.62B
P/E
24.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.58B
Div. yield
0.01%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Garrett Motion leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Garrett Motion 6, Dover 4, Ats 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionATSGTXDOVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.72B $3.73B $28.62B DOV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 50.5x 9.9x 24.5x GTX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.4x 11.4x 20.9x GTX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.8% +6.9% +8.2% ATS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.6% 10.0% 13.6% DOV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.7% 62.4% 10.7% GTX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.5x 1.7x 0.8x DOV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -29.8% +20.0% +19.9% GTX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +24.3%/yr +4.4%/yr GTX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 52.0% 45.0% 25.2% DOV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 66/100 58/100 GTX

Percentile Scorecard

ATSGTXDOV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisATSGTXDOV
Valuation 87 #28 of 204 99 #4 of 204 47 #108 of 204
Growth 79 #41 of 191 49 #98 of 191 47 #102 of 191
Profitability 44 #106 of 189 77 #45 of 189 78 #43 of 189
Financial Health 24 #168 of 221 16 #186 of 221 71 #65 of 221
Shareholder Returns 26 #118 of 158 92 #14 of 158 45 #87 of 158
Overall 52 66 58
  • ATS ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • GTX ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • DOV ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodATSGTXDOVSPY
1 month +3.6%-23.3%+12.6% -2.0%
3 months -32.7%-33.9%+1.8% -2.2%
6 months -44.9%-20.5%-4.4% +4.2%
Year to date -31.3%+19.2%+9.4% +10.6%
1 year -29.8%+20.0%+19.9% +10.4%
3 years -45.0%+178.4%+59.0% +73.6%
3 years, per year -18.1%+40.7%+16.7% +20.2%
5 years —+196.3%+24.1% +61.6%
5 years, per year —+24.3%+4.4% +10.1%
10 years ——+298.5% +261.3%
10 years, per year ——+14.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureATSGTXDOVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 52.0%45.0%25.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.1%39.0%25.2% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.531.730.92 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.570.440.79 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.5%-44.2%-36.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -46.5%-42.7%-8.5% -3.2%
52-week high $35.38$36.23$233.31 $779.14
52-week low $17.29$15.64$178.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleATSGTXDOV
P/E now vs peer median 54.5xmedian 25.4x 10.3xmedian 25.4x 24.6xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 1.9x 1.0xmedian 1.9x 3.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.2xmedian 14.5x 7.6xmedian 14.5x 16.2xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.3xmedian 23.6x 9.7xmedian 23.6x 23.9xmedian 23.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.2x -6.2xmedian 2.2x 3.7xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -1.71median 1.21 0.06median 1.21 4.18median 1.21

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsATSGTXDOV
Revenue $2.12B $3.78B $8.58B
Gross profit $594.19M $799.00M $3.40B
Operating income $119.42M $555.00M $1.46B
Net income $33.97M $377.00M $1.17B
Free cash flow $180.36M $395.00M $1.19B
EPS (diluted) $0.35 $1.98 $8.65
Cash & equivalents $140.09M $211.00M $1.69B
Total debt $870.03M $1.37B $3.26B
Shares (diluted) 98.14M 190.59M 134.88M
Enterprise value $1.04B $3.04B $21.86B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricATSGTXDOV
P/E 54.5x 10.3x 24.6x
P/FCF 10.3x 9.7x 23.9x
P/Operating cash flow 9.1x 8.1x 20.1x
P/S 0.9x 1.0x 3.3x
P/B 1.5x -6.2x 3.7x
P/Tangible book 2.4x -6.2x 4.7x
EV/EBITDA 12.2x 7.6x 16.2x
EV/EBIT 21.7x 9.0x 20.5x
EV/Revenue 1.2x 1.3x 3.5x
EV/FCF 14.3x 12.7x 25.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.7x 10.5x 21.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.71 0.06 4.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricATSGTXDOV
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.8% 6.9% 8.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.5% -0.5% 4.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 24.9% 9.8% 8.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.2% 3.2% 6.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 4,708% 13.0% 10.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -12.6% 3.7% 6.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 228.1% 15.6% -48.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -30.6% 5.5% 4.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 227.3% 22.7% -46.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -32.0% 162.6% 5.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 32.1% 7.2% 14.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 77.8% 0.7% 12.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 37.0% 6.2% 17.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 279.9% -0.2% 12.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricATSGTXDOV
Gross margin 28.0% 21.1% 39.7%
EBITDA margin 10.0% 17.5% 21.6%
Operating margin 5.6% 14.7% 17.0%
Pretax margin 2.4% 12.3% 16.9%
Net margin 1.6% 10.0% 13.6%
FCF margin 8.5% 10.4% 13.9%
Operating cash flow margin 9.6% 12.6% 16.4%
Return on equity 2.7% – 15.2%
Return on assets 1.1% 15.1% 8.5%
Return on invested capital 3.7% 62.4% 10.7%
Return on capital employed – 53.8% 13.1%
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.5x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 6.0x 1.3x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 0.8% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricATSGTXDOV
Debt / assets 28.8% 53.9% 23.9%
Debt / equity 0.7x -2.2x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.5x 1.7x 0.8x
Debt / FCF 4.8x 3.5x 2.7x
Liabilities / assets 57.9% 124.4% 44.2%
Equity / assets 42.1% -24.4% 55.8%
Interest coverage 1.7x 5.4x 12.7x
Current ratio – 1.0x 1.9x
Quick ratio – 0.7x 1.3x
Cash ratio – 0.1x 0.7x
Altman Z-score – 2.35 5.54

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricATSGTXDOV
Dividend yield – 1.5% 1.0%
Net buyback yield 0.3% 6.3% 3.1%
Shareholder yield 0.3% 7.9% 4.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 24.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 23.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – -1.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -0.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusATSGTXDOV
Forward P/E 18.4xFY2026 11.4xFY2026 20.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.03FY2026 $1.82FY2026 $10.22FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -14.9%FY2026 +11.0%FY2026 +6.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +37.9% +13.2% +11.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.98BFY2026 $3.58BFY2026 $8.16BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -7.6%FY2026 0.0%FY2026 +0.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.9% +16.2% +17.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersATSGTXDOV
Held by institutions 83.4% 96.8% 91.1%
Institutions holding 143 460 1,165
Change in shares held, QoQ -9.9% +0.8% -0.3%
Institutions buying 82 240 501
Institutions selling 46 140 406
Buyers to sellers 1.78 1.71 1.23

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ATSGTXDOV
ATS 1.00 0.32 0.37
GTX 0.32 1.00 0.40
DOV 0.37 0.40 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ATS, GTX and DOV?

Dover (DOV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ats (ATS) $1.72B, Garrett Motion (GTX) $3.73B, Dover (DOV) $28.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, ATS, GTX and DOV?

Garrett Motion (GTX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ats (ATS) 50.5x, Garrett Motion (GTX) 9.9x, Dover (DOV) 24.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Garrett Motion (GTX) is cheapest (Ats (ATS) 18.4x, Garrett Motion (GTX) 11.4x, Dover (DOV) 20.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ats (ATS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ats (ATS) +14.8%, Garrett Motion (GTX) +6.9%, Dover (DOV) +8.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Dover (DOV) has the highest net margin (Ats (ATS) 1.6%, Garrett Motion (GTX) 10.0%, Dover (DOV) 13.6%). On return on invested capital, Garrett Motion (GTX) leads (Ats (ATS) 3.7%, Garrett Motion (GTX) 62.4%, Dover (DOV) 10.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Garrett Motion (GTX) returned the most: Ats (ATS) -29.8%, Garrett Motion (GTX) +20.0%, Dover (DOV) +19.9%. Over five years, Garrett Motion (GTX) compounded fastest (Garrett Motion (GTX) +24.3%/yr, Dover (DOV) +4.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ats (ATS) 0.00%, Garrett Motion (GTX) 0.00%, Dover (DOV) 0.01%. Ats (ATS) and Garrett Motion (GTX) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Dover (DOV) has been the steadiest (Ats (ATS) 52.0%, Garrett Motion (GTX) 45.0%, Dover (DOV) 25.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ATS, GTX and DOV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Garrett Motion (GTX) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.