ATPC vs BFNH vs KVUE Stock Comparison

Agape ATP, Bioforce Nanosciences Holdings and Kenvue Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BBWI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ATPC Agape ATP Corp
$1.24 -40.1% 1M -98.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.48M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
KVUE Kenvue Inc.
$19.27 +9.1% 1M +35.3% 1Y
Market cap
$37.02B
P/E
21.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.53B
Div. yield
5.43%
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
3 wins

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Kenvue leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Kenvue 3, Bioforce Nanosciences Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionATPCBFNHKVUELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.48M $229.78M $37.02B KVUE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.3x -2,243x 21.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 15.8x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +3.5% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 10.9% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 10.6% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.2x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 5.43% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -98.0% +875.4% +35.3% BFNH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +34.2%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 375.2% 300.3% 24.3% KVUE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 46/100 65/100 KVUE

Percentile Scorecard

ATPCBFNHKVUE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisATPCBFNHKVUE
Valuation – 18 #42 of 51 60 #21 of 51
Growth 81 #10 of 49 96 #3 of 49 58 #21 of 49
Profitability – 7 #42 of 45 75 #12 of 45
Financial Health – 64 #20 of 54 45 #30 of 54
Shareholder Returns – – 87 #5 of 32
Overall – 46 65
  • ATPC ranked among 58 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • BFNH ranked among 58 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • KVUE ranked among 58 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodATPCBFNHKVUESPY
1 month -40.1%-12.6%+9.1% -2.0%
3 months -52.1%+263.8%+0.2% -2.2%
6 months -56.3%+647.8%+10.6% +4.2%
Year to date -76.8%+1,060.3%+11.7% +10.6%
1 year -98.0%+875.4%+35.3% +10.4%
3 years -99.9%+193.9%+3.6% +73.6%
3 years, per year -89.9%+43.3%+1.2% +20.2%
5 years —+334.2%— +61.6%
5 years, per year —+34.2%— +10.1%
10 years —+13,360.0%— +261.3%
10 years, per year —+63.3%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureATPCBFNHKVUESPY
Volatility, 1Y 375.2%300.3%24.3% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 423.4%404.2%21.0% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -1.33-2.370.07 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.262.921.45 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-94.8%-48.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -98.2%-32.7%-3.1% -3.2%
52-week high $69.00$10.00$19.89 $779.14
52-week low $1.24$0.18$14.24 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleATPCBFNHKVUE
P/E now vs peer median -1.1xmedian 19.0x -2,204xmedian 19.0x 21.9xmedian 19.0x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.7x —median 1.7x 2.4xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.3x —median 13.3x 13.5xmedian 13.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 15.9x -5,384xmedian 15.9x 15.8xmedian 15.9x
P/B now vs peer median —median 2.2x 98.0xmedian 2.2x 3.6xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 0.87 -51.32median 0.87 -83.90median 0.87

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsATPCBFNHKVUE
Revenue – – $15.53B
Gross profit – – $9.05B
Operating income – – $2.71B
Net income -$1.23M -$97.44K $1.69B
Free cash flow – -$41.93K $2.34B
EPS (diluted) $-1.15 $0.00 $0.88
Cash & equivalents – $307.00 $1.04B
Total debt – – $8.21B
Shares (diluted) 1.00M 33.54M 1.93B
Enterprise value $1.48M $229.77M $32.73B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricATPCBFNHKVUE
P/E -1.1x -2,204x 21.9x
P/FCF – -5,384x 15.8x
P/Operating cash flow – -5,384x 13.6x
P/S – – 2.4x
P/B – 98.0x 3.6x
P/Tangible book – 98.0x 20.2x
EV/EBITDA – – 13.5x
EV/EBIT -0.5x -364.9x 16.3x
EV/Revenue – – 2.8x
EV/FCF – -5,384x 18.9x
EV/Operating cash flow – -5,384x 16.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 -51.32 -83.90

Growth

14 metrics
MetricATPCBFNHKVUE
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 3.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 0.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 3.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 1.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 14.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -1.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 54.3% 92.5% 17.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 11.6% 41.3% -0.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 56.5% 92.1% 17.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -34.8% 42.9% -0.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 42.9% 27.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 10.0% 2.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 42.9% 42.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 10.0% 0.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricATPCBFNHKVUE
Gross margin – – 58.3%
EBITDA margin – – 21.1%
Operating margin – – 17.4%
Pretax margin – – 14.8%
Net margin – – 10.9%
FCF margin – – 15.1%
Operating cash flow margin – – 17.6%
Return on equity – -78.2% 16.3%
Return on assets – -51.7% 6.3%
Return on invested capital – – 10.6%
Return on capital employed – -55.6% 13.2%
Asset turnover – – 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.4x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricATPCBFNHKVUE
Debt / assets – – 30.8%
Debt / equity – – 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.2x
Debt / FCF – – 3.5x
Liabilities / assets – 3.5% 61.9%
Equity / assets – 96.5% 38.1%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio – 25.4x 1.0x
Quick ratio – 0.0x 0.6x
Cash ratio – 0.0x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – – 2.23

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricATPCBFNHKVUE
Dividend yield – – 5.4%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – 5.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusATPCBFNHKVUE
Forward P/E – – 15.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – – $1.22FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +13.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – -0.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $16.05BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +6.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +6.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersATPCBFNHKVUE
Held by institutions – – 94.3%
Institutions holding – – 1,010
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +3.7%
Institutions buying – – 529
Institutions selling – – 353
Buyers to sellers – – 1.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ATPCBFNHKVUE
ATPC 1.00 0.03 -0.10
BFNH 0.03 1.00 0.05
KVUE -0.10 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ATPC, BFNH and KVUE?

Kenvue (KVUE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Agape ATP (ATPC) $1.48M, Bioforce Nanosciences Holdings (BFNH) $229.78M, Kenvue (KVUE) $37.02B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bioforce Nanosciences Holdings (BFNH) returned the most: Agape ATP (ATPC) -98.0%, Bioforce Nanosciences Holdings (BFNH) +875.4%, Kenvue (KVUE) +35.3%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Agape ATP (ATPC) 0.00%, Bioforce Nanosciences Holdings (BFNH) 0.00%, Kenvue (KVUE) 5.43%. Agape ATP (ATPC) and Bioforce Nanosciences Holdings (BFNH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kenvue (KVUE) has been the steadiest (Agape ATP (ATPC) 375.2%, Bioforce Nanosciences Holdings (BFNH) 300.3%, Kenvue (KVUE) 24.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ATPC, BFNH and KVUE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kenvue (KVUE) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.