ATMP vs MS vs GS Stock Comparison

Barclays Bank, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MUFG) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ATMP Barclays Bank Plc
$35.84 +3.6% 1M +29.0% 1Y
Market cap
$9.81B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
2 wins
MS Morgan Stanley
$185.74 -2.4% 1M +13.3% 1Y
Market cap
$299.67B
P/E
15.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$78.04B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins
GS Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$898.67 -0.5% 1M +13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$275.05B
P/E
12.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$69.70B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Goldman Sachs leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Goldman Sachs 6, Morgan Stanley 3, Barclays Bank 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionATMPMSGSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.81B $299.67B $275.05B MS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 15.3x 12.9x GS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 13.6x 11.9x GS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +18.0% +17.8% MS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 25.0% 30.3% GS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 12.0% 14.1% GS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.9x -5.5x GS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +29.0% +13.3% +13.8% ATMP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.3%/yr +12.6%/yr +16.6%/yr GS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 16.3% 28.7% 32.2% ATMP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 39/100 35/100 MS

Percentile Scorecard

ATMPMSGS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisATMPMSGS
Valuation – 6 #338 of 359 12 #315 of 359
Growth – 87 #44 of 340 48 #179 of 340
Profitability – 24 #261 of 343 16 #288 of 343
Financial Health 48 #177 of 338 2 #330 of 338 12 #297 of 338
Shareholder Returns 93 #25 of 351 75 #87 of 351 89 #41 of 351
Overall – 39 35
  • ATMP ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • MS ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • GS ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodATMPMSGSSPY
1 month +3.6%-2.4%-0.5% -2.3%
3 months -0.1%-12.1%-12.5% -0.7%
6 months +1.4%-1.2%-0.5% +4.8%
Year to date +24.6%+4.6%+2.2% +10.3%
1 year +29.0%+13.3%+13.8% +10.3%
3 years +65.2%+143.6%+174.3% +73.0%
3 years, per year +18.2%+34.6%+40.0% +20.1%
5 years +112.8%+81.0%+115.0% +61.9%
5 years, per year +16.3%+12.6%+16.6% +10.1%
10 years +64.2%+464.2%+408.9% +258.6%
10 years, per year +5.1%+18.9%+17.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureATMPMSGSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 16.3%28.7%32.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 17.0%30.3%32.9% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.181.441.66 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.780.460.43 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -23.0%-35.3%-33.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.9%-18.7%-22.0% -3.5%
52-week high $37.29$228.55$1,152.07 $779.14
52-week low $27.56$154.37$773.70 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleATMPMSGS
P/E now vs peer median —median 12.7x 14.8xmedian 12.7x 13.5xmedian 12.7x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.5x 3.7xmedian 3.5x 4.0xmedian 3.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 4.9x 6.4xmedian 4.9x -2.8xmedian 4.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.4x -15.7xmedian 11.4x -6.3xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 1.2x 2.5xmedian 1.2x 2.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.46 0.50median 1.46 0.34median 1.46

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsATMPMSGS
Revenue – $78.04B $69.70B
Net income – $20.37B $22.17B
Free cash flow – -$18.58B -$39.98B
EPS (diluted) – $12.46 $70.77
Cash & equivalents $303.23B $160.14B $176.77B
Total debt $116.64M $392.56B $444.82B
Shares (diluted) 337.58M 1.57B 301.10M
Enterprise value -$1.32T -$209.42B -$3.47T

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricATMPMSGS
P/E – 14.8x 13.5x
P/FCF – -15.7x -6.3x
P/Operating cash flow – -18.7x -6.7x
P/S – 3.7x 4.0x
P/B 0.2x 2.5x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 0.2x 2.6x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA – 6.4x -2.8x
EV/EBIT – 6.8x -2.9x
EV/Revenue – 6.7x -4.2x
EV/FCF – -28.2x 6.7x
EV/Operating cash flow – -33.6x 7.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.50 0.34

Growth

14 metrics
MetricATMPMSGS
Revenue growth (1Y) – 18.0% 17.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 13.3% 13.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) – 36.7% 34.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 26.0% 33.3%
EPS growth (1Y) – 40.3% 41.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 29.4% 40.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 11.8% -72.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 27.6% -53.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 11.3% -66.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 25.1% -58.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricATMPMSGS
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 104.2% 146.8%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – 33.5% 39.7%
Net margin – 25.0% 30.3%
FCF margin – -23.8% -62.7%
Operating cash flow margin – -20.0% -59.5%
Return on equity – 17.5% 17.1%
Return on assets – 1.3% 1.0%
Return on invested capital – 12.0% 14.1%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -0.8x -1.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.6% 5.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricATMPMSGS
Debt / assets 0.0% 23.4% 20.6%
Debt / equity 0.0x 3.3x 3.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.9x -5.5x
Debt / FCF – -21.1x -10.5x
Liabilities / assets 95.5% 93.0% 94.2%
Equity / assets 4.5% 7.0% 5.8%
Interest coverage – 1.5x 1.4x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricATMPMSGS
Dividend yield 4.5% 2.3% 2.0%
Net buyback yield – 2.5% 6.2%
Shareholder yield 4.5% 4.8% 8.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusATMPMSGS
Forward P/E – 13.6xFY2026 11.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $13.66FY2026 $75.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +33.8%FY2026 +46.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -4.2% -6.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $80.05BFY2026 $68.80BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +13.3%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +13.3% +4.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersATMPMSGS
Held by institutions – 85.7% 72.1%
Institutions holding – 2,745 3,152
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.5% +1.1%
Institutions buying – 1,470 1,554
Institutions selling – 940 1,125
Buyers to sellers – 1.56 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ATMPMSGS
ATMP 1.00 -0.10 -0.11
MS -0.10 1.00 0.86
GS -0.11 0.86 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ATMP, MS and GS?

Morgan Stanley (MS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Barclays Bank (ATMP) $9.81B, Morgan Stanley (MS) $299.67B, Goldman Sachs (GS) $275.05B.

Which stock is cheaper, ATMP, MS and GS?

Goldman Sachs (GS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Morgan Stanley (MS) 15.3x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Goldman Sachs (GS) is cheapest (Morgan Stanley (MS) 13.6x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 11.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Morgan Stanley (MS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Morgan Stanley (MS) +18.0%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +17.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Goldman Sachs (GS) has the highest net margin (Morgan Stanley (MS) 25.0%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 30.3%). On return on invested capital, Goldman Sachs (GS) leads (Morgan Stanley (MS) 12.0%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 14.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Barclays Bank (ATMP) returned the most: Barclays Bank (ATMP) +29.0%, Morgan Stanley (MS) +13.3%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +13.8%. Over five years, Goldman Sachs (GS) compounded fastest (Barclays Bank (ATMP) +16.3%/yr, Morgan Stanley (MS) +12.6%/yr, Goldman Sachs (GS) +16.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Barclays Bank (ATMP) has been the steadiest (Barclays Bank (ATMP) 16.3%, Morgan Stanley (MS) 28.7%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 32.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ATMP, MS and GS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Goldman Sachs (GS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.