ATI vs LECO vs IFF Stock Comparison

Ati, Lincoln Electric Holdings and International Flavors & Fragrances Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ATI Ati Inc
$165.17 -8.6% 1M +67.6% 1Y
Market cap
$23.86B
P/E
50.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.72B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Lincoln Electric Holdings leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Lincoln Electric Holdings 7, Ati 4, International Flavors & Fragrances 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionATILECOIFFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $23.86B $15.54B $23.20B ATI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 50.1x 27.0x 33.3x LECO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 34.6x 24.1x 27.6x LECO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.6% +11.1% -4.6% LECO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.1% 12.4% 7.0% LECO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.9% 22.6% 3.0% LECO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 1.0x 3.0x LECO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.02% IFF
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +67.6% +16.6% +39.7% ATI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +59.4%/yr +14.5%/yr -9.3%/yr ATI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 41.3% 30.8% 35.1% LECO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 55/100 53/100 ATI

Percentile Scorecard

ATILECOIFF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisATILECOIFF
Valuation 16 #79 of 94 36 #130 of 203 50 #48 of 94
Growth 89 #11 of 91 43 #107 of 188 81 #18 of 91
Profitability 92 #8 of 84 95 #11 of 184 63 #32 of 84
Financial Health 50 #48 of 94 45 #119 of 217 45 #52 of 94
Shareholder Returns 50 #35 of 69 57 #66 of 153 27 #51 of 69
Overall 59 55 53
  • ATI ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • LECO ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • IFF ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodATILECOIFFSPY
1 month -8.6%+3.5%+5.7% +0.9%
3 months -7.2%+8.8%+13.8% +5.9%
6 months +13.0%+9.0%+31.6% +8.5%
Year to date +43.9%+17.1%+34.5% +13.3%
1 year +67.6%+16.6%+39.7% +12.4%
3 years +339.4%+62.5%+33.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +63.8%+17.6%+10.1% +23.5%
5 years +925.9%+97.0%-38.5% +68.2%
5 years, per year +59.4%+14.5%-9.3% +11.0%
10 years +1,113.6%+328.4%-32.6% +263.4%
10 years, per year +28.4%+15.7%-3.9% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureATILECOIFFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 41.3%30.8%35.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.3%31.2%28.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.641.180.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.640.541.13 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.0%-35.3%-61.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.7%-6.1%-3.7% -0.9%
52-week high $231.79$298.88$94.13 $779.14
52-week low $94.80$220.64$61.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleATILECOIFF
P/E now vs peer median 47.3xmedian 22.0x 26.5xmedian 25.4x 33.2xmedian 22.0x
P/S now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 1.4x 3.3xmedian 1.9x 2.3xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 26.8xmedian 12.4x 17.7xmedian 14.3x 16.6xmedian 12.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 42.7xmedian 15.5x 29.7xmedian 21.8x 42.9xmedian 15.5x
P/B now vs peer median 11.3xmedian 1.7x 9.8xmedian 2.2x 1.7xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 5.34median 1.84 3.80median 1.41 1.03median 1.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsATILECOIFF
Revenue $4.72B $4.64B $9.98B
Gross profit $1.10B $1.65B $3.74B
Operating income $716.80M $802.52M $754.00M
Net income $488.90M $575.27M $295.00M
Free cash flow $526.30M $511.89M $540.00M
R&D – – $684.00M
EPS (diluted) $3.44 $10.48 $2.71
Cash & equivalents $783.00M $283.24M $569.00M
Total debt $2.19B $1.15B $5.70B
Shares (diluted) 138.30M 54.87M 257.00M
Enterprise value $21.88B $14.40B $20.85B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricATILECOIFF
P/E 47.3x 26.5x 33.2x
P/FCF 42.7x 29.7x 42.9x
P/Operating cash flow 27.9x 22.8x 19.9x
P/S 4.8x 3.3x 2.3x
P/B 11.3x 9.8x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 11.3x 9.8x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA 26.8x 17.7x 16.6x
EV/EBIT 33.3x 20.0x 37.5x
EV/Revenue 5.1x 3.5x 2.8x
EV/FCF 45.4x 31.4x 52.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 29.7x 24.1x 24.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.34 3.80 1.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricATILECOIFF
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.6% 11.1% -4.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.5% 4.5% -5.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 15.7% 7.7% -3.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 12.6% 5.5% -0.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 8.8% 12.9% 295.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 16.4% 7.0% 35.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 12.9% 9.6% 170.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 5.8% 4.9% 28.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 17.9% 11.0% 900.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.9% 7.0% 32.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 69.9% 0.7% 5.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 0.5% 12.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 123.6% -6.3% -4.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -3.6% 26.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricATILECOIFF
Gross margin 23.4% 35.5% 37.5%
EBITDA margin 18.9% 19.5% 17.1%
Operating margin 15.2% 17.3% 7.6%
Pretax margin 12.7% 16.2% 3.5%
Net margin 10.1% 12.4% 7.0%
FCF margin 11.2% 11.0% 5.4%
Operating cash flow margin 17.1% 14.4% 11.6%
Return on equity 25.2% 37.0% 2.1%
Return on assets 8.9% 14.9% 1.2%
Return on invested capital 14.9% 22.6% 3.0%
Return on capital employed 17.6% 27.7% 3.6%
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.2x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 1.2x 3.9x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% 0.5% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricATILECOIFF
Debt / assets 38.2% 29.5% 22.7%
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.7x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 1.0x 3.0x
Debt / FCF 4.2x 2.2x 10.6x
Liabilities / assets 65.2% 60.1% 44.3%
Equity / assets 34.8% 39.9% 55.7%
Interest coverage – – 4.0x
Current ratio 2.3x 1.9x 2.1x
Quick ratio 1.1x 1.0x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.3x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 5.41 7.71 1.78

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricATILECOIFF
Dividend yield – 1.1% 1.8%
Net buyback yield 1.2% 1.8% 0.3%
Shareholder yield 1.2% 2.9% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 30.0% 138.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 33.7% 75.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.5% 0.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 6.3% -20.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusATILECOIFF
Forward P/E 34.6xFY2026 24.1xFY2026 27.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.78FY2026 $11.62FY2026 $3.28FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +47.5%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026 -21.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +23.4% +0.4% +23.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.24BFY2026 $4.84BFY2026 $8.10BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +14.2%FY2026 +14.5%FY2026 -25.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.3% +5.5% -8.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersATILECOIFF
Held by institutions 93.5% 81.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 785 701 753
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +5.5% +6.0%
Institutions buying 478 297 410
Institutions selling 217 266 226
Buyers to sellers 2.20 1.12 1.81

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ATILECOIFF
ATI 1.00 0.42 0.15
LECO 0.42 1.00 0.31
IFF 0.15 0.31 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ATI, LECO and IFF?

Ati (ATI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ati (ATI) $23.86B, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) $15.54B, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) $23.20B.

Which stock is cheaper, ATI, LECO and IFF?

Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ati (ATI) 50.1x, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 27.0x, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) 33.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) is cheapest (Ati (ATI) 34.6x, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 24.1x, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) 27.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ati (ATI) +4.6%, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) +11.1%, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) -4.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) has the highest net margin (Ati (ATI) 10.1%, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 12.4%, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) 7.0%). On return on invested capital, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) leads (Ati (ATI) 14.9%, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 22.6%, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) 3.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ati (ATI) returned the most: Ati (ATI) +67.6%, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) +16.6%, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) +39.7%. Over five years, Ati (ATI) compounded fastest (Ati (ATI) +59.4%/yr, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) +14.5%/yr, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) -9.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) has the highest dividend yield: Ati (ATI) 0.00%, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 0.01%, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) 0.02%. Ati (ATI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) has been the steadiest (Ati (ATI) 41.3%, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 30.8%, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) 35.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ATI, LECO and IFF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.