ATI vs CLMT vs IFF Stock Comparison

Ati, Calumet and International Flavors & Fragrances Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ESI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ATI Ati Inc
$166.15 -10.4% 1M +81.2% 1Y
Market cap
$22.63B
P/E
47.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.72B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
4 wins
CLMT Calumet, Inc. /DE
$49.89 -7.0% 1M +148.1% 1Y
Market cap
$4.37B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$4.59B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

International Flavors & Fragrances leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (International Flavors & Fragrances 4, Ati 4, Calumet 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionATICLMTIFFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $22.63B $4.37B $23.07B IFF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 47.6x -32.0x 33.1x IFF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 34.8x — 28.4x IFF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.6% +12.8% -4.6% CLMT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.1% -3.0% 7.0% ATI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.9% 2.0% 3.0% ATI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x -12.3x 3.0x CLMT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +81.2% +148.1% +42.8% CLMT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +58.3%/yr +35.8%/yr -8.9%/yr ATI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 41.9% 43.9% 35.0% IFF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 44/100 51/100 ATI

Percentile Scorecard

ATICLMTIFF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisATICLMTIFF
Valuation 15 #80 of 94 33 #63 of 94 43 #54 of 94
Growth 89 #11 of 91 98 #3 of 91 82 #17 of 91
Profitability 91 #9 of 86 38 #54 of 86 59 #36 of 86
Financial Health 50 #48 of 95 7 #88 of 95 46 #52 of 95
Shareholder Returns 49 #36 of 70 – 28 #51 of 70
Overall 59 44 51
  • ATI ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • CLMT ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • IFF ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodATICLMTIFFSPY
1 month -10.4%-7.0%+8.8% -0.2%
3 months -11.2%+20.3%+17.7% +3.9%
6 months +9.5%+63.5%+31.8% +8.2%
Year to date +44.8%+151.1%+38.4% +12.9%
1 year +81.2%+148.1%+42.8% +12.3%
3 years +342.0%+283.5%+37.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year +64.2%+56.6%+11.2% +23.3%
5 years +892.5%+361.5%-37.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year +58.3%+35.8%-8.9% +10.9%
10 years +1,133.5%+1,266.8%-30.1% +261.1%
10 years, per year +28.6%+29.9%-3.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureATICLMTIFFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 41.9%43.9%35.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.5%44.2%28.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.65-0.080.68 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.943.371.22 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.0%-61.9%-61.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.3%-15.5%-0.9% -1.2%
52-week high $231.79$59.05$94.13 $779.14
52-week low $91.71$18.22$61.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleATICLMTIFF
P/E now vs peer median 47.6xmedian 22.0x -31.9xmedian 22.0x 34.2xmedian 22.0x
P/S now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 1.4x 1.0xmedian 1.4x 2.4xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.0xmedian 12.4x -37.3xmedian 12.4x 17.0xmedian 12.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 43.0xmedian 15.1x 59.6xmedian 15.1x 44.1xmedian 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median 11.3xmedian 1.6x -3.9xmedian 1.6x 1.7xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median 5.37median 1.66 —median 1.66 1.06median 1.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsATICLMTIFF
Revenue $4.72B $4.59B $9.98B
Gross profit $1.10B $301.50M $3.74B
Operating income $716.80M $47.10M $754.00M
Net income $488.90M -$136.80M $295.00M
Free cash flow $526.30M $73.50M $540.00M
R&D – – $684.00M
EPS (diluted) $3.44 $-1.56 $2.71
Cash & equivalents $783.00M $109.80M $569.00M
Total debt $2.19B $2.26B $5.70B
Shares (diluted) 138.30M 87.59M 257.00M
Enterprise value $20.65B $3.91B $20.73B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricATICLMTIFF
P/E 47.6x -31.9x 34.2x
P/FCF 43.0x 59.6x 44.1x
P/Operating cash flow 28.1x 30.0x 20.5x
P/S 4.8x 1.0x 2.4x
P/B 11.3x -3.9x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 11.3x -3.9x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA 27.0x -37.3x 17.0x
EV/EBIT 33.5x 138.7x 38.4x
EV/Revenue 5.1x 1.4x 2.9x
EV/FCF 45.7x 88.9x 53.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 29.8x 44.7x 24.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.37 – 1.06

Growth

14 metrics
MetricATICLMTIFF
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.6% 12.8% -4.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.5% – -5.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 15.7% 926.0% -3.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 12.6% – -0.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 8.8% 125.6% 295.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 16.4% – 35.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 12.9% 69.7% 170.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 5.8% – 28.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 17.9% 70.0% 900.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.9% – 32.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 69.9% 392.2% 5.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 12.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 123.6% 159.8% -4.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 26.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricATICLMTIFF
Gross margin 23.4% 6.6% 37.5%
EBITDA margin 18.9% -3.8% 17.1%
Operating margin 15.2% 1.0% 7.6%
Pretax margin 12.7% -5.9% 3.5%
Net margin 10.1% -3.0% 7.0%
FCF margin 11.2% 1.6% 5.4%
Operating cash flow margin 17.1% 3.2% 11.6%
Return on equity 25.2% – 2.1%
Return on assets 8.9% -4.9% 1.2%
Return on invested capital 14.9% 2.0% 3.0%
Return on capital employed 17.6% 3.0% 3.6%
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.7x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x -1.1x 3.9x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% 0.6% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricATICLMTIFF
Debt / assets 38.2% 80.6% 22.7%
Debt / equity 1.1x -2.0x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x -12.3x 3.0x
Debt / FCF 4.2x 30.7x 10.6x
Liabilities / assets 65.2% 140.6% 44.3%
Equity / assets 34.8% -40.6% 55.7%
Interest coverage – 0.2x 4.0x
Current ratio 2.3x 0.8x 2.1x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.4x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 5.43 1.29 1.81

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricATICLMTIFF
Dividend yield – – 1.7%
Net buyback yield 1.2% – 0.3%
Shareholder yield 1.2% 0.0% 2.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 138.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 75.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 0.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -20.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusATICLMTIFF
Forward P/E 34.8xFY2026 – 28.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.78FY2026 $-1.93FY2026 $3.28FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +47.5%FY2026 – -21.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +23.4% – +23.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.24BFY2026 $4.81BFY2026 $8.10BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +14.2%FY2026 +16.1%FY2026 -25.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.3% +7.3% -8.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersATICLMTIFF
Held by institutions 93.5% 52.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 785 188 753
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +1.2% +6.0%
Institutions buying 478 110 410
Institutions selling 217 54 226
Buyers to sellers 2.20 2.04 1.81

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ATICLMTIFF
ATI 1.00 0.03 0.14
CLMT 0.03 1.00 -0.17
IFF 0.14 -0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ATI, CLMT and IFF?

International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ati (ATI) $22.63B, Calumet (CLMT) $4.37B, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) $23.07B.

Which stock is cheaper, ATI, CLMT and IFF?

International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ati (ATI) 47.6x, Calumet (CLMT) -32.0x, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) 33.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) is cheapest (Ati (ATI) 34.8x, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) 28.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Calumet (CLMT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ati (ATI) +4.6%, Calumet (CLMT) +12.8%, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) -4.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ati (ATI) has the highest net margin (Ati (ATI) 10.1%, Calumet (CLMT) -3.0%, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) 7.0%). On return on invested capital, Ati (ATI) leads (Ati (ATI) 14.9%, Calumet (CLMT) 2.0%, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) 3.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Calumet (CLMT) returned the most: Ati (ATI) +81.2%, Calumet (CLMT) +148.1%, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) +42.8%. Over five years, Ati (ATI) compounded fastest (Ati (ATI) +58.3%/yr, Calumet (CLMT) +35.8%/yr, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) -8.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ati (ATI) 0.00%, Calumet (CLMT) 0.00%, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) 0.02%. Ati (ATI) and Calumet (CLMT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) has been the steadiest (Ati (ATI) 41.9%, Calumet (CLMT) 43.9%, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) 35.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ATI, CLMT and IFF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.