ASX vs AMKR vs GFS Stock Comparison

ASE Technology Holding, Amkor Technology and Globalfoundries Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FN) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AMKR Amkor Technology, Inc.
$39.30 -26.3% 1M +22.9% 1Y
Market cap
$9.17B
P/E
16.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.46B
Div. yield
0.01%
Semiconductor Packaging and Testing Technology
2 wins
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
$44.39 -4.4% 1M +26.2% 1Y
Market cap
$25.34B
P/E
35.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.94B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

ASE Technology Holding leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (ASE Technology Holding 6, Globalfoundries 3, Amkor Technology 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionASXAMKRGFSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $86.83B $9.17B $25.34B ASX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 44.5x 16.5x 35.4x AMKR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 30.7x 14.9x 24.4x AMKR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.2% +17.9% +1.4% ASX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.5% 7.4% 10.3% GFS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 11.1% 8.6% 5.1% ASX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.1x 0.0x -0.6x GFS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +201.8% +22.9% +26.2% ASX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +41.6%/yr +12.0%/yr — ASX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 57.9% 80.3% 60.2% ASX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 52/100 61/100 GFS

Percentile Scorecard

ASXAMKRGFS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisASXAMKRGFS
Valuation 75 #25 of 95 88 #12 of 95 92 #9 of 95
Growth 78 #21 of 93 48 #49 of 93 38 #58 of 93
Profitability 68 #30 of 91 52 #44 of 91 56 #41 of 91
Financial Health 17 #85 of 102 24 #78 of 102 48 #54 of 102
Shareholder Returns 61 #30 of 76 48 #40 of 76 72 #22 of 76
Overall 60 52 61
  • ASX ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • AMKR ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • GFS ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodASXAMKRGFSSPY
1 month -11.9%-26.3%-4.4% -1.0%
3 months +5.0%-39.5%-17.1% +2.9%
6 months +20.9%-49.7%-28.2% +6.4%
Year to date +140.3%-0.5%+27.1% +11.4%
1 year +201.8%+22.9%+26.2% +13.1%
3 years +401.2%+79.0%-18.4% +79.4%
3 years, per year +71.2%+21.4%-6.6% +21.5%
5 years +468.1%+76.4%— +67.7%
5 years, per year +41.6%+12.0%— +10.9%
10 years +554.7%+308.5%— +255.2%
10 years, per year +20.7%+15.1%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureASXAMKRGFSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 57.9%80.3%60.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.4%85.5%59.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.573.462.15 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 3.490.290.44 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.1%-66.7%-61.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.8%-58.0%-50.7% -2.5%
52-week high $47.62$93.55$89.96 $779.14
52-week low $12.82$30.19$32.24 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleASXAMKRGFS
P/E now vs peer median 43.0xmedian 41.5x 17.5xmedian 41.5x 34.4xmedian 41.5x
P/S now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 6.9x 1.3xmedian 6.9x 3.6xmedian 6.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.7xmedian 27.3x 7.3xmedian 27.3x 11.4xmedian 27.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 35.6x -56.5xmedian 35.6x 31.0xmedian 35.6x
P/B now vs peer median 7.0xmedian 4.2x 2.1xmedian 4.2x 2.1xmedian 4.2x
PEG now vs peer median 5.54median 2.31 -9.59median 2.31 -1.56median 2.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsASXAMKRGFS
Revenue $22.92B $7.46B $6.94B
Gross profit $4.46B $1.16B $1.88B
Operating income $2.24B $644.04M $804.00M
Net income $2.65B $558.05M $720.00M
Free cash flow $12.11B -$172.39M $796.00M
R&D $1.18B $160.67M $563.00M
EPS (diluted) $0.88 $2.22 $1.28
Cash & equivalents $2.86B $1.55B $1.09B
Total debt $31.57B $7.16B $1.12B
Shares (diluted) 2.21B 249.98M 558.00M
Enterprise value $74.84B $707.86M $13.64B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricASXAMKRGFS
P/E 43.0x 17.5x 34.4x
P/FCF 7.1x -56.5x 31.0x
P/Operating cash flow 15.9x 8.2x 12.9x
P/S 3.8x 1.3x 3.6x
P/B 7.0x 2.1x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 8.5x 2.1x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA 19.7x 7.3x 11.4x
EV/EBIT 40.8x 15.1x 29.2x
EV/Revenue 4.0x 1.3x 3.4x
EV/FCF 7.5x -56.4x 29.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.8x 8.1x 12.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.54 -9.59 -1.56

Growth

14 metrics
MetricASXAMKRGFS
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.2% 17.9% 1.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.6% 2.5% -4.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 37.8% 34.7% 15.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 6.5% 0.6% -6.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 68.3% 58.1% 575.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 4.3% -2.2% -12.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 83.5% 82.7% 742.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 3.2% -1.3% -21.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 81.8% 81.3% 717.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.8% -1.8% -22.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 51.2% 21.3% 20.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.0% 4.1% -4.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 57.3% -162.2% -18.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.4% -41.4% -16.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricASXAMKRGFS
Gross margin 19.5% 15.5% 27.1%
EBITDA margin 20.2% 17.8% 29.5%
Operating margin 9.8% 8.6% 11.6%
Pretax margin 10.7% 8.5% 12.6%
Net margin 8.5% 7.4% 10.3%
FCF margin 52.9% -2.3% 11.5%
Operating cash flow margin 23.6% 16.0% 27.6%
Return on equity 22.0% 12.1% 6.1%
Return on assets 8.4% 6.2% 4.3%
Return on invested capital 11.1% 8.6% 5.1%
Return on capital employed 8.4% 9.4% 5.5%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.8x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.0x 2.1x 2.7x
Stock comp / revenue – – 3.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricASXAMKRGFS
Debt / assets 25.2% 25.6% 6.6%
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.5x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.1x 0.0x -0.6x
Debt / FCF 0.7x -14.4x 1.4x
Liabilities / assets 63.7% 51.8% 30.0%
Equity / assets 36.3% 48.2% 70.0%
Interest coverage 9.9x 8.4x –
Current ratio 0.3x 2.2x 2.5x
Quick ratio 1.5x 2.0x 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.6x 1.2x 1.1x
Altman Z-score – 2.87 2.71

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricASXAMKRGFS
Dividend yield 1.0% 0.8% 0.5%
Net buyback yield – – 1.6%
Shareholder yield 1.0% 0.8% 2.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 14.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -47.9% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -54.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 6.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusASXAMKRGFS
Forward P/E 30.7xFY2026 14.9xFY2026 24.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.26FY2026 $2.63FY2026 $1.82FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +125.0%FY2026 +75.3%FY2026 +5.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +38.1% +1.1% +33.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $24.29BFY2026 $7.82BFY2026 $6.96BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +19.3%FY2026 +16.6%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +32.0% +13.5% +23.0%
ASX estimates →AMKR estimates →GFS estimates →

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersASXAMKRGFS
Held by institutions 6.9% 46.8% 98.4%
Institutions holding 482 648 438
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.5% -4.2% -3.0%
Institutions buying 308 390 305
Institutions selling 133 191 88
Buyers to sellers 2.32 2.04 3.47
ASX holders →AMKR holders →GFS holders →

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ASXAMKRGFS
ASX 1.00 0.69 0.64
AMKR 0.69 1.00 0.64
GFS 0.64 0.64 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry
ASX · Semiconductor Packaging and Testing
+TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing +MUMicron Technology +INTCIntel +AMATApplied Materials +UMCUnited Microelectronics +MCHPMicrochip Technology +MTSIMACOM Technology Solutions Holdings +FNFabrinet
Plot all 21 Semiconductor Packaging and Testing stocks → Plot all 26 Semiconductor Manufacturing stocks →

Related Comparisons

ASX vs TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing ASX vs MUMicron Technology ASX vs INTCIntel ASX vs AMATApplied Materials

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ASX, AMKR and GFS?

ASE Technology Holding (ASX) is the largest by market capitalisation: ASE Technology Holding (ASX) $86.83B, Amkor Technology (AMKR) $9.17B, Globalfoundries (GFS) $25.34B.

Which stock is cheaper, ASX, AMKR and GFS?

Amkor Technology (AMKR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 44.5x, Amkor Technology (AMKR) 16.5x, Globalfoundries (GFS) 35.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Amkor Technology (AMKR) is cheapest (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 30.7x, Amkor Technology (AMKR) 14.9x, Globalfoundries (GFS) 24.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

ASE Technology Holding (ASX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +18.2%, Amkor Technology (AMKR) +17.9%, Globalfoundries (GFS) +1.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Globalfoundries (GFS) has the highest net margin (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 8.5%, Amkor Technology (AMKR) 7.4%, Globalfoundries (GFS) 10.3%). On return on invested capital, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) leads (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 11.1%, Amkor Technology (AMKR) 8.6%, Globalfoundries (GFS) 5.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ASE Technology Holding (ASX) returned the most: ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +201.8%, Amkor Technology (AMKR) +22.9%, Globalfoundries (GFS) +26.2%. Over five years, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) compounded fastest (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +41.6%/yr, Amkor Technology (AMKR) +12.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 0.00%, Amkor Technology (AMKR) 0.01%, Globalfoundries (GFS) 0.00%. ASE Technology Holding (ASX) and Globalfoundries (GFS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) has been the steadiest (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 57.9%, Amkor Technology (AMKR) 80.3%, Globalfoundries (GFS) 60.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ASX, AMKR and GFS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.