ASML vs EMR vs KLAC Stock Comparison

Asml Holding, Emerson Electric and Kla Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MKSI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ASML Asml Holding Nv
$1,496.30 -19.5% 1M +45.3% 1Y
Market cap
$576.70B
P/E
53.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.62B
Div. yield
0.62%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
3 wins
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$170.30 +4.9% 1M +23.6% 1Y
Market cap
$94.99B
P/E
36.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
1.31%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
4 wins
KLAC Kla Corp
$149.76 -27.6% 1M +25.5% 1Y
Market cap
$195.13B
P/E
37.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.51B
Div. yield
0.31%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Kla leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Kla 5, Emerson Electric 4, Asml Holding 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionASMLEMRKLACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $576.70B $94.99B $195.13B ASML
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 53.1x 36.9x 37.2x EMR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 31.4x 25.2x 26.4x EMR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +22.9% +4.8% +15.8% ASML
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 29.1% 13.8% 36.2% KLAC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 10.9% 43.4% KLAC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.8x 0.6x KLAC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.62% 1.31% 0.31% EMR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +45.3% +23.6% +25.5% ASML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.1%/yr +11.7%/yr +29.2%/yr KLAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.4% 32.0% 62.1% EMR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 44/100 58/100 KLAC

Percentile Scorecard

ASMLEMRKLAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisASMLEMRKLAC
Valuation 16 #79 of 94 32 #139 of 204 41 #56 of 94
Growth 81 #18 of 92 39 #117 of 191 51 #46 of 92
Profitability 79 #20 of 90 85 #29 of 189 97 #4 of 90
Financial Health 14 #87 of 101 31 #154 of 221 21 #80 of 101
Shareholder Returns 44 #45 of 79 31 #110 of 159 83 #14 of 79
Overall 47 44 58
  • ASML ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • EMR ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • KLAC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodASMLEMRKLACSPY
1 month -19.5%+4.9%-27.6% -1.0%
3 months -10.8%+4.8%-22.3% -0.4%
6 months -3.1%+15.1%-17.5% +4.5%
Year to date +39.9%+28.3%+23.3% +12.4%
1 year +45.3%+23.6%+25.5% +13.6%
3 years +132.9%+85.2%+199.7% +76.4%
3 years, per year +32.6%+22.8%+44.2% +20.8%
5 years +76.7%+73.9%+259.4% +63.7%
5 years, per year +12.1%+11.7%+29.2% +10.4%
10 years +1,359.9%+244.7%+1,909.7% +267.7%
10 years, per year +30.8%+13.2%+35.0% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureASMLEMRKLACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.4%32.0%62.1% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.6%33.8%66.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.251.542.74 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.950.740.41 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.9%-29.9%-51.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.8%-0.3%-50.4% -1.6%
52-week high $1,989.44$170.76$301.71 $779.14
52-week low $966.57$123.30$109.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleASMLEMRKLAC
P/E now vs peer median 53.1xmedian 40.5x 36.9xmedian 25.5x 37.2xmedian 40.5x
P/S now vs peer median 15.3xmedian 6.5x 5.1xmedian 1.9x 13.5xmedian 6.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 24.9x 17.2xmedian 14.4x 30.3xmedian 24.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 46.0xmedian 36.9x 27.4xmedian 23.3x 48.3xmedian 36.9x
P/B now vs peer median 25.0xmedian 3.9x 4.7xmedian 2.2x 29.9xmedian 3.9x
PEG now vs peer median 2.20median 1.85 -0.89median 1.16 1.77median 1.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsASMLEMRKLAC
Revenue $37.62B $18.64B $14.51B
Gross profit $19.58B $9.91B $8.92B
Operating income – $4.68B $6.19B
Net income – $2.58B $5.26B
Free cash flow – $3.46B $4.04B
R&D – – $1.57B
EPS (diluted) $28.13 $4.59 $4.01
Cash & equivalents $15.17B $2.18B $1.53B
Total debt $5.16B $13.11B $5.72B
Shares (diluted) 388.90M 561.10M 1.31B
Enterprise value $532.39B $87.75B $187.71B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricASMLEMRKLAC
P/E 53.1x 36.9x 37.2x
P/FCF 46.0x 27.4x 48.3x
P/Operating cash flow – 24.3x 43.2x
P/S 15.3x 5.1x 13.5x
P/B 25.0x 4.7x 29.9x
P/Tangible book 25.7x 8.1x 30.9x
EV/EBITDA – 17.2x 30.3x
EV/EBIT – 22.7x 32.2x
EV/Revenue 15.0x 5.7x 13.7x
EV/FCF – 30.6x 49.4x
EV/Operating cash flow – 27.1x 44.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.20 -0.89 1.77

Growth

14 metrics
MetricASMLEMRKLAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 22.9% 4.8% 15.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 19.4% 7.6% 12.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 24.9% 5.7% 16.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 20.6% 11.0% 13.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 9.2% 18.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 13.6% 17.8%
Net income growth (1Y) – -3.0% 24.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -42.0% 19.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 35.2% -2.2% 25.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 24.2% -41.6% 21.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 4.4% 6.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 10.1% 8.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 4.4% 4.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 9.4% 7.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricASMLEMRKLAC
Gross margin 52.0% 53.2% 61.5%
EBITDA margin – 33.1% 45.4%
Operating margin – 25.1% 42.6%
Pretax margin – 17.6% 42.2%
Net margin 29.1% 13.8% 36.2%
FCF margin – 18.6% 27.8%
Operating cash flow margin – 21.0% 31.1%
Return on equity – 12.7% 81.7%
Return on assets – 6.1% 28.9%
Return on invested capital – 10.9% 43.4%
Return on capital employed – 14.9% 45.4%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.4x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.5x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.3% 2.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricASMLEMRKLAC
Debt / assets 8.7% 31.1% 31.1%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.6x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.8x 0.6x
Debt / FCF – 3.8x 1.4x
Liabilities / assets 61.2% 51.7% 64.6%
Equity / assets 38.8% 48.3% 35.4%
Interest coverage – – 22.0x
Current ratio 1.3x 0.9x 2.8x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.5x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.2x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – 4.77 12.58

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricASMLEMRKLAC
Dividend yield 0.6% 1.3% 0.3%
Net buyback yield – 1.0% 1.3%
Shareholder yield 0.6% 2.3% 1.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 47.8% 21.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 35.6% 27.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.1% 15.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 0.7% 15.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusASMLEMRKLAC
Forward P/E 31.4xFY2026 25.2xFY2026 26.4xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $47.62FY2026 $6.75FY2026 $5.67FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +61.2%FY2026 +12.5%FY2026 +50.8%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +42.0% +15.3% +16.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $47.18BFY2026 $18.13BFY2026 $19.18BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +20.9%FY2026 +0.6%FY2026 +41.2%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +42.9% +15.3% +8.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersASMLEMRKLAC
Held by institutions 19.8% 82.1% 91.0%
Institutions holding 2,493 2,294 2,483
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.0% +0.9% +4.2%
Institutions buying 1,359 1,083 1,288
Institutions selling 783 799 984
Buyers to sellers 1.74 1.36 1.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ASMLEMRKLAC
ASML 1.00 0.53 0.81
EMR 0.53 1.00 0.50
KLAC 0.81 0.50 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ASML, EMR and KLAC?

Asml Holding (ASML) is the largest by market capitalisation: Asml Holding (ASML) $576.70B, Emerson Electric (EMR) $94.99B, Kla (KLAC) $195.13B.

Which stock is cheaper, ASML, EMR and KLAC?

Emerson Electric (EMR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Asml Holding (ASML) 53.1x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 36.9x, Kla (KLAC) 37.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Emerson Electric (EMR) is cheapest (Asml Holding (ASML) 31.4x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 25.2x, Kla (KLAC) 26.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Asml Holding (ASML) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Asml Holding (ASML) +22.9%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%, Kla (KLAC) +15.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kla (KLAC) has the highest net margin (Asml Holding (ASML) 29.1%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%, Kla (KLAC) 36.2%). On return on invested capital, Kla (KLAC) leads (Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%, Kla (KLAC) 43.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Asml Holding (ASML) returned the most: Asml Holding (ASML) +45.3%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +23.6%, Kla (KLAC) +25.5%. Over five years, Kla (KLAC) compounded fastest (Asml Holding (ASML) +12.1%/yr, Emerson Electric (EMR) +11.7%/yr, Kla (KLAC) +29.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Emerson Electric (EMR) has the highest dividend yield: Asml Holding (ASML) 0.62%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 1.31%, Kla (KLAC) 0.31%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Emerson Electric (EMR) has been the steadiest (Asml Holding (ASML) 47.4%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 32.0%, Kla (KLAC) 62.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ASML, EMR and KLAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kla (KLAC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.